Rough Draft Rougher because I lost it and some of the past few months but this is it recovered

The Itty Bitty Writer with Schizophrenia: I Am Sane and These Are Some of My Thoughts.

Duplicity and Manipulation: Culterica's Game of Parameters.

Phased Revelation and operations, War as Cultural Production with Hidden Multifacetation

Preface

Now at midnight all the agents

And the superhuman crew

Come out and round up everyone

That knows more than they do…

From bob Dylan’s Desolation Row

Jon Stewart announced in January of 2024 that he was returning to the Daily Show. I’m kind of glad about this. I have some critique of the way the show delivers news or acts as a news source for much of the country because it results in us all collectively laughing at atrocity and that which we shouldn't tolerate. Though, I guess there is some levity necessary for the human and social condition to alleviate pressure and make sure we don't act stupidly in opposition to atrocity. There is a lot happening on an organized covert level in this country. What is clear is that something is happening in this world which packaged history doesn’t explain or reveal nor journalism. I delve into a few aspects of this reality in this book and in some cases share my thoughts, speculation or educated guess as to what is happening. Acknowledging this reality has gotten me diagnosed with a Schizoid Affective Disorder. I don’t really even know the proper diagnosis, but I’m treated like a “Paranoid Schizophrenic.”

I believe that I have experienced Schizophrenia my whole life as far as I can remember, but it took a turn in a very intense and recognizable way right around the time my grandmother died when I was 25.  However, it had been an observable reality for me when I was 23 or 24 years old as well. For instance, I had always received messages in movies and I watched the movie Inception at 24 and the main character’s name was Dom (my name) and he was on the run from corporations with his dreams hacked and such. I currently experience some sort of dream frequency, which I don’t know if I am subject to highly advanced corporate technology, digital realities, parallel universes or some crazy intergalactic frequency and technology. As I will discuss in a later chapter and in this preface, in April of 2011 I was threatened by 2 women identifying themselves as police officers in a coffee shop after leaving my grandmother’s hospital and while I was reading a book called Unveiling Traditions by Anour Majid at a Starbucks in San Fernando. The women used a tactic I will discuss later called Directed Conversation and said I had “crossed the line” and that they “F**k people up when they least suspect it.” 3 days later, I was attacked on the highway while heading to a linguistics class at LA Valley College. The date of this attack was my Grandpa John’s death date, April 13th. My grandmother Beatrice’s passing a few months later made me question my community and the threats from police and hostility from people made me question it as well.

We live in a very nice community in Santa Clarita, California. However, sometimes in experiencing schizophrenia, I am reminded of underhanded occurrences that I have experienced while here. I was a teenager during an effort to run my dad out of his job, which had very strong suspicious indications of it being a retaliation effort for hiring Gloria Alred as an attorney. Some weeks are filled with creepy looking people and angry people everywhere I go. However, most of the time, people are generally happy and pleasant. We’ve had a few weird neighbors, including one down the street who yelled “faggot!” at me for no reason after my recognition of organized stalking after a trip to San Francisco, during which a second staged car accident took place on the highway. Another neighbor threatened to smash our camper’s windows if we parked on the street again. So, I am scared of the medical system here to be frank. The nurse that took care of my grandma at the local hospital before her death had a tattoo of the mercenary group Blackwater and the doctor they removed from her case said the hospital was run by Nazis. Those were his exact words. It seems very dismissive if I don't think of that as relevant to my extended time or our extended time going forward.

 I sometimes look at towns in articles around the country and wonder are they different than Southern California? And is that a good or a bad thing for schizophrenia? Some towns across the country which maybe seem like they could be nice communities and are architecturally or naturally pretty are Frederick and Columbia, Maryland, Ann Arbor Michigan, or Salt Lake City Utah. For Utah, I'm a little weary of someplace where religion is intertwined into the governing and for the other I’m weary of the idea of being an outsider to some degree versus some dominant group. I like California that way because it seems pretty inclusive and openminded and of course has great entertainment and natural oasis galore. What I’ve learned is that my experience with schizophrenia may have some differences due to geography even if people say it won’t, but it could be worse elsewhere also or it could be better or the same. No matter where you are, it’s hard to find community when you experience schizophrenia. So, I use social media to formulate and release my thoughts. I personally think the toxicity in society and on social media is designed and deliberate so that people don’t form communities and share ideas and information. I think social media is a bit like a modern behavior or controlled grafitti for people who are sort of feeling not part of regular society or fitting into society. Maybe this isn’t always the case, but I think sometimes it is. I guess in some respects, it’s the opposite in that people are trying to be accepted and validated too, but I suppose that is a characteristic of graffiti too. This book is sort of my personal graffiti in controlled book format.

One form of the controlled toxicity you find in society I think is designed to make the youth of society form into new persons or almost a social engineering or chiseling of the people that the powerful seat holders want them to become. These seats are often, though not totally, where elders reside.  In the nomenclature of Mind Control programs, this is called the Monarch Butterfly programming. The idea is that you transform after the process, governed by the Monarch controllers. There is often the idea thrown around in media and society and imparted on people and youth, that they must ‘grow’ into another person or be challenged and put through trials and tribulations to achieve some master set of growth. It is an old human idea that manifests in many religions and social structures. I personally feel this whole "growth" thing that all these people tell the youth to do or harass them to make them "grow" is a big scam in the way of not valuing them as already themselves, a full human being deserving respect and dignity. This scam of ‘growth’ is a process by which to indignify people and place others on pedestal with outstretched power over other people’s lives. This is why youth largely get exploited and manipulated. I think it’s all chalked up to a "growth process" by some of the tweaked elders and peers of our society. One is reminded of Pink Floyd’s Brick in The Wall song. And this isn’t to totally discount the idea of growth in a being or person, but rather to point out how it is utilized to diminish the personhood of the youth and the experience or gnosis that comes with being a human of any age. I’m not trying to declare disrespectful retaliation against elders or peers or discount wisdom of an elder or peer, and I do in fact think the youth owe the elders of society some amount of respect, service and monetary expenditure for their experience in time and knowledge and dues for their lives. Yet there needs to be some acknowledgement that abuse of youth in effort to impart wisdom through ‘growth’ is a scam and that this minimizes their human experience and gnosis.

 A similar thing happens with people experiencing schizophrenia. They are relegated to the realm of ‘unable to discern reality.’ Their social standing and experience are devalued, diminished and erased in the council of social happenings. What occurs almost naturally in the system, to youth and in generation wars to all sides, is returned to just about anyone by way of a schizophrenic experience. Of course, this is justified to the distributors of abuse by the content the schizophrenic mind produces in effort to make the person experiencing schizophrenia “grow.” And supposedly this makes society grow. I was in my youth during the onset of my schizophrenia and it changed the trajectory of my personhood and the way I fit socially in society or my social standing.  When you are experiencing schizophrenia, society destroys your life and then acts like what they did was nothing more than a goofy tongue in cheek joke. They do this laughing and act as if they have performed some favor for you. Furthermore, they use this notion or big lie that they are performing you a favor, to make society believe that the schizophrenic actually owes society a debt to be paid in production. Everyday the schizophrenic is made to pay in some action, state of being, or mental information so that people won’t get harmed or for their own sanity.

In schizophrenia, you pay a daily debt for your sanity. I borrow in part from the gnostics and they have an idea that there is a lesser deity called the Demiurge which created earth’s reality and from what I understand, the physical world goes largely by the rules of a deranged or fool of a deity, but gnostics hold that the higher deity, I guess often referred to as the goddess Sophia, exists in the cosmos which is much saner. Perhaps this debt put on people experiencing schizophrenia is actually an example or manifestation of that lower deity. I’ll never understand how there is so much literature in the health industry and medical industry about how stress is a killer and yet people still seem to think it’s acceptable to create stress for people in their lives at all, let alone on a continuous basis.

I came to the realization while writing this book that if I label myself to others or describe myself, I am an itty bitty writer who experiences Schizophrenia. I realize now why people like to say they experience homelessness or are a person and not call themselves 'disabled' and such. I don't need to be dismissed in my experience as just 'diseased' or 'genetically inferior,’ but I do understand that I am still actually experiencing schizophrenia. It is a reality to be experienced. And much of the experience can be explained by coming into contact with systems or operations using modern or advanced technology. I am just a one time semi activist. I am now a brain damaged author, finishing this book about surveillance, technology in society, and psychological operations. One thing that is happening in our democracy is that people aren't comfortable sharing what they think and feel about various ideas and events or issues. This is partly because everything is made polarizing and consequential by people who do like to discuss. Part of this uncomfortableness in openly being honest about how one feels is that workplaces are tied into Stasi networks and can penalize people for harboring a belief, thought or opinion. This can happen even if people state their belief, thought or opinion in the confines of their house.

In declaring that I experience schizophrenia I should point out that it is like coookooo coco brains stuff. Not to make light of the effect on others, but I experience the whole big shebang. As with the Comedy Central behavior mentioned in the beginning of this preface, I too maintain some levity as I am not in charge of deciding what happens and this helps me keep my sanity through general irreverence for society’s silent behavior and the powerful’s irresponsibility. I experience people hate stalking me and obsessive love stalking me everywhere I go trying to drive me crazy. Massive amounts of surveillance, perhaps even competing organizations surveilling each’s activity. An organization broadcasting my thoughts to the world. Natural disasters in response to drinking alcohol, my thoughts or eating.  Politicians mimicking me, actors and actresses sending coded messages in movies that predict my life and friends’ and family’s lives going back decades and I have voices in my head on and off for a decade or more. Pretty much the whole world sends me back feedback and makes me responsible for everything that goes on in the world based on totally arbitrary things I do. Wars are started to try and affect me in response to my thought or activity. I don’t experience the voices so much with the medication as now it comes in about 1 month bouts once or twice a year as opposed to the 6 year straight sequence I experienced during the 2010s. I think this is a coordinated racket and I've written this book about experiencing schizophrenia that I hope will contribute to research and historical documentation of how schizophrenia should not relegate the schizophrenic to social disregard and is actually explained by operations and systems utilizing modern technology or highly advanced technology. So I guess I wrote this book for history, research and self-soothing to some degree, perhaps even as a defense of my sanity and peace in my mind, my world and the world at large. It’s unclear to me that is the aim of the people conducting reality. Though sometimes I hope so.

Some of the narrative controllers of whatever is happening in society are TV Networks. In 2023, CNN ran a segment in which two reporters from CNN discussed how The New York Times published an article describing Havana Syndrome victims hearing voices in their heads. CNN reported that this likely was produced by a weapon. Yet CNN still promotes false narratives of "tinfoil hat" tropes without correcting the public record that technology and weapons to target people's brains is wide spread. Does one ignore the CNN story, dipping their toe in the water of technology induced voice hearing by insinuating weapons caused Havanah Syndrome Victims to hear voices in their heads? Or rather, does one ignore the reality CNN paints a false narrative about with “tin foil hat” tropes used over and over again in their other reporting? A real society with any sort of journalism would have segwayed to reports by Nils Melzer the former Special Rapporteur on Torture at the United Nations and his report that governments around the world were engaging in psychological torture using highly advanced Cybertechnologies.

In a real reckoning with their own reporting, CNN would have to admit that voice hearing is evidence of extra carricular activity or militant activity surrounding schizophrenics who hear voices. This ignorance of reality, even a reported reality that has no effective bearing on the rest of the year’s broadcasts according and narrative according to CNN’s actions, happens with an apparent hidden technological advancement being demonstrated in our skies as well. I don't know what is happening, but we are living in a society in which there are UFOs flying all over the sky, everyone sees them and everyone knows about them. They are even discussed on snippets on the news and even by congress and the Pentagon, but there is like no wider curiosity apparent or discussion about the greater implications of apparent high tech spacefaring or interdimensional travel, or possibly antigravity machines that dates back in eyewitness reported accounts to the 1940s and perhaps even thousands of years. It’s like something we aren't allowed to talk about and furthermore, in other respects, its completely ignored as a reality. Additionally, there are demonstrative ways to read our minds. Facebook is getting mind reading wristbands. Workplaces are implementing brain monitoring. And there also seems to be a lack of allowance for people to talk about it or demonstrate or practice curiosity in how that is trudging along or should trudge along in society. As far back as 1960 there was a vice presidential Candidate named Daniel Fry who said he was communicated with by a "mothership" above the earth telepathically and had his mind read. Now how much of that is a true story? And how much of that is a creative story based on some sort of reality?

In his book UFO: The Inside Story of the Us Government's Search for Alien Life Here--And Out There, author Garret M. Graff points out that Gorillas were thought to be a myth in the West until 1847. So it seems like the authority with which people speak about the "myths" of Aliens, UFOs or Time Travel and in my opinion, Schizophrenia as an inability to recognize reality and as a disease, could be in fact just ignorance to another aspect of reality. This type of ignorance is something which humans have demonstrated throughout time.

Humans are an organized, plan-centric species. The America Revolution was conducted by conspiracists and established a culture of conspiracists to dominate America and battle the British Empire and eventually would join with that country and others around the world in its own sort of Empire. You can call me an Organizational Theorist, I’m not a “conspiracy theorist.” I’m an experienced subject and witness of a conspiracy with appropriate cognition. I say that this conspiracy is just organized human behavior. This cognition, which I will share more at the end of the book, caused a mind reading agency within the global intelligence networks of the world to experiment with my brain. I submit some basics of my cognition below in this preface to give the reader an idea about why I was possibly subjected to brain experimentation research by this type of American Empire which may in fact function as a front for placement in a Galactic Federation for all I know:

Example of my thoughts generating experimental interest.

We need to maximize this Earth's lifespan and maintain equilibrium or ecological health and also we need to explore space and make relations with other planets and species for when Earth is no longer habitable, whether by our own mismanagement of the planet or by natural causes of the Universe’s time clock like the moon getting too far away, the death of the sun, colliding galaxies or the big freeze that is coming in this universe. Any of these or other scenarios, some inevitable, makes our escape to another planet, another galaxy or a parallel universe necessary for our survival. This likely means we need to enhance ourselves culturally and spiritually as a Civilization. And we need knowledge of what the termed “breakaway civilization” is doing and perhaps simultaneously or beforehand, we need to seriously abandon this violent competition-based order of the world where everybody in the world is atomized, competing with each other for their basic survival and needs to the point of nuclear annihilation or excessive expenditure of earth’s resources and the trashing of our habitat. Because humans are a very plan-centric and organized species, as of this writing I’m of the mind that it’s time we use our brain capacities to develop systems that are collaborative and take care of people’s mental and physical health and dignity while relying on our better motivations and helping us develop our better motivations, like desiring to be in harmony, to contribute, to create, to be free and to love. We can incorporate a confluence of these desires and others. We need to exercise these aspects of our species and develop civilization along these lines, rather than develop base competitive violence systems of deprivation while trashing the planet for our domination by a few thousand rich people. It's funny, yet tragic, to live in a militarized society which admires institutions who have the mantra "leave no man behind" and then see hundreds of thousands homeless or millions without health care.

It’s often said in the Capitalist American world that capitalism functions better than socialism for the masses. Yet the word socialism has different meanings to different people, like for some Social Security is socialism in the United States, its hard to argue against social security being better than 1920s American society. In some respects, it’s hard to argue that American capitalism functions better for the masses than Scandinavian social democracies, which also get called socialist because of their mixed economies, with life and death access to healthcare being universal in those countries versus 33 million plus humans without health care in the United States. I should iterate here that I am a social democrat in my personal idea about what seems to be most functional and a reasonable step to take with consensus probability between the two polarities of accellerationists on the left and right. I am most certainly not for dystopian civil war that seems to be where each polarity pushes us without compromise and consensus. One reason for socialist or more outright socialist countries not functioning in the global system on the same level as Capitalist countries is, in part, due to the fact that the world is run by greedy psychos who pit armies and whole economic systems and societies against the functioning of the socialist country that has tried to buck the world order. But even taking the functioning of Capitalist countries to be superior on its face, the fact that socialist societies have an objective or intention of taking care of everyone in the society makes it halfway there in the way of a functioning world order for humanity as the necessary modification can exist as a possibility with a societal intention to benefit everyone or take care of everyone. Capitalist societies, on the other hand, will likely never get to the point of taking care of everyone because the intention or objective of a capitalist society is to allow the opportunity for the masses to compete with each other for resources at the behest of a few thousand rich people who pull the strings and get to decide who ‘makes it' and who doesn’t. The capitalist world order is one in which the losers exist out of propagandized mind and it is intentional for some people to lose and some people to win.

Functionally, capitalism may in the current cultural, political and spiritual climate of earth perform better for some people or for more people than a rogue socialist country, but it will never be modified to the point of universality in taking care of all its inhabitants by people who believe in its intention to pit people in competition for opportunities to gain subsistence so basically a few thousand people can accumulate extreme vast wealth.  

I have my beliefs that we need to go to a new system or civilization that takes into account successes of old and does away with failures of old and develops better human motivations than fear of deprivation that is based on violence and competition and instead is one that protects equilibrium and earth’s environment. I also think the Breakaway civilization should be known about or that we need to as a whole humanity improve our lot so that the Universe won't retaliate against crazy free wheeling humanity in the future. However,  I'm under no illusions that it will happen. So I don’t fault anyone’s avenue for obtaining money which is the necessary token we need to live in this civilization so long as it doesn’t harm others and you can’t avoid it honestly. I just want to make a life under this system we have best I can. Its kind of like

"This is the song that never ends.

It just goes on and on my friends.

Some people started singing it not knowing what it was

 and they'll just keep on singing it forever just because"

Journalist Caitlin Johnstone writes that for the world to survive or humanity to survive,  we need to create a utopian civilization or perish. For centuries, the retort to people trying to create a better world and political or economic systems has always been “you are unrealistic” and that “you dream of Utopia.” And while Johnstone cites the hard to ignore reality that we either create a Utopian civilization or perish as a species, it makes me think that politicians and powerful people basically do live in little warped Utopias instead of creating universal actual utopias for us all to live in. The example I’d cite is Washington DC with its nearby historical slave plantations and its organized wealthy comfortable spaces compared to the rest of the country. Or take for instance an occasional public bathroom that’s been cleaned when you have to pee. Is it not utopian for me to piss in a cleaned bathroom when I am miles from my house in some random place? But there was a cost for that. Quite possibly an immigrant cleaned it and did so on minimal wage living in poverty, possibly traveling home to a slummy neighborhood without benefits or health insurance or maybe even without democratic or human rights. My little warped utopia of periodic or occasional relieved piss bliss. Nobody says this is unrealistic when we as bathroom users occasionally experience this rather than an actual utopia in which someone is appropriately benefitted for uncomfortable job or their hazardous labor or as a community, we share responsibility perhaps for this public benefit or public health contribution or many times a business courtesy.

Maybe in trying to appeal to Americana population we should draw attention to founding fathers’ brains were they transplanted to today and conditioned by modern knowledge that they’d want to revolutionize the world in practice or institutionally to deal with modern problems, reject old order and examine past mistakes. On the wall of the Memorial of an author of the Declaration of Independence is Thomas Jefferson’s writing, On the Northeast Portico it quotes Jefferson as saying:

"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."

I think he may have seen 250 years as infrequent.

Jefferson also wrote of a pursuit of happiness and there is often a question asked in our society: Are we obsessed with being happy or with happiness? I don’t really think there is an obsession with it. I think there is an obsession with "being happy amidst psychopathy and dystopia" which is unhealthy, but we should be trying to keep ourselves and everyone happy. It should be a collective goal and individual goal or at least 1 of our collective goals as part of an effort to achieve utopia, but sometimes you need other emotions to burrow your way to fulfillment, which makes people happy in the end.

The right is very good at creating these things that are symbolic representations of freedom in people's minds, but don’t really mean freedom at all or really have any correlation to enhancing freedom in a life. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, for instance, likes to invoke Gas, Guns, Beef and Christianity or the flag. None of these things actually is freedom.

Guns kill and create dangerous unsafe anxiety for communities. People can’t walk down the street at night unless they are ready to get into a shootout. They are used to assassinate and threaten democratic governments. That’s not freedom.

Gas is a tax that chokes the world and contributes to death of the planet. It is solidified as a powerful industry tied into war and kept as a behemoth industry in charge by invention secrecy act of 1951 which confiscates any other ideas challenging status quo industries. This is not freedom and it is going to be be limiting freedom further as sustainability is challenge.

Beef throws cows into factory slaughter houses and resigns people to brutal work environments damaging and traumatizing them and ends life early with heart disease contributes to ecocide. This is not freedom.

Christianity convinces people to limit women's freedom and life stature creating controlling theocracies. This is not freedom.

The flag gets used to wrap tyrannical activity and whole sale wars which the founder of the country James Madison said was the biggest threat to freedom in existenc. This is not freedom.

These things and symbols they use, get used to limit discussion on how to best increase freedom in people’s lives. Is there room for these things in a freedom loving society? I think maybe in some cases yes and there are ways in which some things like Christianity can enhance freedom by valuing people as worthy and children of god or what not, but they are not emblematic and in some ways are contradictory to a free society Ted Cruz invokes beef for instance to point out an existential crisis threatening freedom that of beef restriction at the hands of a Kamala Harris Administration. Now I’m not for beef restriction at this time, but it and the rest of these things are not lines I would draw in the sand and say freedom ends and begins here. I actually eat beef and find carne asada or California burritos are my favorite thing to eat taste wise, but I question their environmental impact and my heart health as well as the morality of factory farms which are rather disgusting things, so there are reasons to regulate the industry and I don’t think it would be a big deal toward my freedom. It is like the freedom to smoke. People that want to make that the issue with which we talk about the idea of freedom likely don’t want the idea of freedom explored.

How about guarantee a house? or economic means to purchase experiences or free time? How’s about not starting at zero or debt for people who aren’t wealthy in a capitalist system and have a citizen’s wage or not make life so consequential with various punitive punishments for failing? What about editing our 40 hour work week system which is often greater for people and hasn’t been updated in a hundred years? Ted cruz and co like to talk graphically about a woman's decision to bear life, yet disregard war and the graphic nature of definitive mass murder and in fact wrap the flag around it as if that is harbinger for freedom. Its a weird freedom he cherishes. ANd I'm not sure how much of it can be determined to be freedom at all.

As far as creating a new system or civilization that takes into account successes and failures of old and current system, in some respects, this mixture of systems or wedding of systems does take place in the world. China for instance functions like a capitalist economy, yet under direction of a communist political party. I’m not experienced or educated enough to say they should be modeled upon, but I just point out that they have had some success wedding different systems and utilizing what works or successes of different systems. This just shows that hybrid ideas are already taking place. It is widely acknowledged that China raised incredible millions out of poverty operating this way.

One problem people have with China’s system is that of control. People have to know that you aren't coming from a place of manipulation, control and hostility to be open to developing rapport and interpersonal relationships or political relationships. Putting in effort to be respectful and going with the flow in case of interpersonal relationships or in the case of politics to find common ground and accepting people for who they are can contribute to that reality. There are currently University level studies which make the claim that the Conservative brain and liberal brain have different biological qualities. This perhaps can lead us down a path of questioning what this is all about civilization, intellect, politics, social structures. Perhaps America is an experiment created by experimentees.

For the sake of study I divided up the whole annual income in the United States and if you divided that equally among all adults over 18 years old it’d be 100 thousand dollars. So like conceivably just take one household, where between 3 people it is at about 200 thousand. If they were making 100k each and working or retired, they’d be at 300 thousand. So maybe individually one might lose, but they’d have retirement and  if they functioned collectively they’d be at 300 thousand as opposed to household income of 200 thousand. Now I think other thoughts like could you keep production creatively under a collective egalitarian system? I don’t know. Also, lets say you conceivably get people to buy into equality or egalitarianism (which they are in no manner there at the moment in the capitalist or liberal democratic world) in an egalitarian system, I don’t know how you synthesize equality among people in different towns and cities. Like towns and cities aren’t equal and different environments aren’t equal, people’s desires aren’t equal. People will want to all live next to the ocean so how do you decide who gets to do that? Maybe that’s besides the point and you just try to create as much equality as you can the best you can, but it would be undermining the tenets of the society just by being on an unequal earth.

While I’m not personally for egalitarianism because I don’t think you can gain consensus and it would create conflict at this time. I am for social democracy as opposed to socialism that takes over the means of production 1.The state is not currently capable of taking over the means of production. It hasn’t been done in the United States since World War 2 and even then it was a more a combination of fascism and socialism to combat fascism. 2. State rule of production does not have consensus possibility I don’t think. And 3. It seems to be less successful than social democracy and I like it more. Clearly there’s room for bridging the wealth gap in our civilization. Republicans were so embarrassed that Trickle down was seen as a giant scam and farce, one of the biggest failures in the country’s history, that they put up Trump a billionaire buffoon drawing attention to immigrants as scapegoats so they could continue the practice of pilfering wealth and siphoning it toward the top 1 percent. It was their only play and they have gone all in on it. They had to find a problem and paint the bottom of society as the real problem. It is sick and frankly people supporting Trump on immigration are either a calculated sick people with trump or they are being fooled.

Status quo in immigration and national boundaries runs the risk of a false flag terror attack where normal immigrants will be scapegoated and Nazi moves get exaggerated in this country. This is another reason why I am for international cooperation and plans to unify or build up western hemisphere which maybe if people get on board with it will result in political integration among Spanish and English speaking world.

I am for greater political integration in the world like was dreamt up in the United Nations or European Union and what was floated in North American Union idea for a while. I think the problems of war, climate calamities, transnational gangs, economic exploitation, borderless wealth reach and a hierarchy of nationalities could be alleviated by political integration. To be a refugee or migrant I think is the inevitability of all intelligent life and civilizations in the Universe including us humans, so we might as well be open to this behavior culturally as a civilization because we are going to need the favor in the future when we go off world.

 I was reminded of the black taxi tour I took in Belfast. I thought this tour was very educational. If the reader doesn’t know there was a time in Ireland during the 20th century where there was a war fought and terrorism used by Irish Catholics to fight against oppression by the British in Northern Ireland. The black Taxi tour takes an educational tour of the current neighborhoods that were segregated and violently at odds with each other in the past. Our driver had a more Irish catholic tinge, but told both sides. I am someone who is not religious now, but was raised catholic and I am 29 percent Irish in my DNA as well as 6 percent British and 15 percent Scottish. As an American as well, I am sort of wondering if the residual division in Ireland is a bit like the civil war is here in the States and people never left. It seems like there are ancient divisions or something present in these conflicts. I know we are talking decades removed, but it was crazy to see the walls separating neighborhoods still today and the residual animosity present with the pictures of the British bonfire towers that take place every July burning Irish regalia and such. I enjoy visiting Ireland and Britain and I enjoy both peoples and it seems that what is present still to some degree in Belfast is not present in everyone. I don't have attached trauma to this history like others do minus stories of my ancestors that predate immigrating to America in the 19th century. It seems though that division helps certain segments of the society including two different churches and people who would like antagonisms for manipulative purposes like hoarding wealth. As an American, I think wouldn’t it be great if the English speaking world were politically integrated? But I guess everyone likes to have their neighborhood preserved in character and such.

Like with the conflict of Capitalism vs socialism or what we can learn in generality with any political conflict such as the Troubles of Ireland,  you certainly can’t run any society with half the population in a death match against the other population or each other and undermining efforts to make any sort of system or civilization work. So, without compromise and consensus any civilization going forward will fail in large ways. All this being said, the tenets of American society are a real problem, not just Politicians or corporations, but the fact that we have all been made subjects competing with each other for resources and approval of uber rich people in effort to accumulate more wealth and power for rich people. I’m talking the uber rich who control capital in the hundreds of millions and definitely those controlling billions or more. They largely dictate the economy. I suppose there’s some democratic control through consumer choice, but in the scheme of things we are all pushed around by bigger fish.

For this reason, I find a compromise to some of the problems we face is to care about the dignity of all and provide basic necessities of people which allow them the freedom to accumulate more through ownership or  work for additional activities. I find there can be ample incentive to make a system work that way and balance some power between capital and labor.  But just take the concept of freedom and liberty, central to the American “experiment” or political project. How free is a population in poverty with the threat of deprivation or compelled labor, often with little choice in the matter even though choice is heralded as a supreme benefit of the system? Currently, politicians in the Republican Political party are supposing that Americans should retire at 70 years old. I personally think we should work 4-6 hour days like 4 days a week or 30 hrs a week or so and share responsibilities and work load to make a civilization function. I don't think we are supposed to be exhausted, stressed and unhealthy as humans from our contributions, whether it be to our bank account, or to society and civilization. It seems unnatural to me to continue such a system in such a way. I’m still at such an age where I can do it since I have to and I can still enjoy work and life, but it seems rather obvious that humans need to develop more of a balance to work of society and free time or healthy living.

One possible solution to this in America could be Universal Basic Income. I became aware sometime in my early 20s of the fact that certain countries in Scandinavia were either using or testing Universal Basic Income or citizen’s wage. This appealed to me because I thought that this with health care and housing development or building could alleviate conflict between businesses and Unions. If we take care of housing, health care and have a UBI as a society, it could afford people to work for small businesses who then in turn would have to be quality places instead of using deprivation and total poverty or homelessness as a coercive backdrop. People would be more free to pursue greater riches or live with basic necessities. It would also alleviate extreme poverty. Possibly, unions would be less necessary with that bargaining position. I think businesses would have to make concessions even without unionization in such a scenario. You wouldn't necessarily need to have so high a minimum wage either which would help small businesses and businesses wouldn't need to pay the health insurance.

But this problem is representative of a greater problem. There needs to be acknowledgement in our politics of the way our current political and economic system pits us all into different camps with different interests or that it is just basically incohesive. For instance, its not in a homeowner's interest for property values to fall and many rely on their house ownership to bankroll their retirement. Meanwhile, it is in the interest of the other half of the population for property values to fall so that they can get into the ownership realm. A question should be asked is this division an accidental oversight to the world created long ago or is it an ancient systematic deliberate mechanism to keep us divided? If I am correct in my suspicion, I think that high end Industrial capitalists or political organizations control crime and violence and deteriorate neighborhoods so that people or workers are even more desperate and cutthroat trying to get money to move to nicer safer neighborhoods. Not building housing is done for the same basic reason.

Crime may lower property or cost in small ways or in small geographical locations relative to elsewhere, but across the whole and its ultimate effect is that it makes everyone more desperate and in competition for jobs, security and community or niceties. So it raises property and rent on a macroscale. It creates disunion which makes the masses less unified in demanding privileges and rights like housing healthcare jobs income or recreation and luxuries.

 Individual liberty happens on a spectrum or to particular degrees. A dead planet is also pretty limiting in the degree to which humanity will experience liberty and freedom in the future or now with ill health affects or climate calamities. The degree to which individual liberty needs to be curtailed in order to take care of the planet is negligible for most people in the future if we act in sound judgment. Infrastructure that uses renewables? Limiting a billionaires share of the economic and political power over others? Cultural and political laws to regulate for Regenerative farming versus corporate farming? Organic versus cancer causing Pesticides? What is the liberty of a corporation or person being curtailed verses the liberty of humanity on the whole in these regards? Electric cars or hidden technology by the secret 1950s Invention Secrecy National Security act? Individual liberty is curtailed by poverty or lack of opportunity or market or profit over people behavior as well as by ideas of communism and green dictatorships. There are forces limiting the degree of liberty that get wrapped up in a Freedom USA Flag as well.

The anarchist line of thought is that we don't need a state and that people can freely associate and have open access to resources to build a house or form trade partnership or community I guess. But who's going to educate everyone in the world or any people into valuing land, environment and others to share the resources responsibly if not a State? Seems one is necessary at this time and to me the lack of or availing oneself to start respecting the idea of a State having a role in aiding humanity needs to happen if the state can ever function better. The free market puts people in the street and the state houses them so in that instance I like the state. The retort will be the state aids the idea of private property and bars people from accessing and associating to meet their needs. But then I ask well should we all just be allowed to cut down forests on the whim of individuals or groups with no control over that process? How will you determine how to use best practices and sustainable practices if there is no state educating people to value that idea or practice?

The state is needed because we don't in fact live in a Utopia now nor is one possible right now. Now could humanity make a utopia, and do we need to? Sure. But paying a tax to a state is not utopian. It's Utopian to think corporations or everyone will magically learn how to be an unselfish person or organization or that people will organize into an anarchist society that is peaceful upon one state hierarchy leaving in one generation. So while you could call wealthy spaces little warped Utopias they are not real utopias…The Utopia of the future may include anarchical society at the forefront, but I think to get there, there needs to be a State that is pushing toward that Utopian unselfish life affirming culture. Humanity has a long way to go and it will take a unified structure on earth to push us there I believe. I guess one of the mysteries of humanity is hierarchy, it’s messiness and our messy rebellion against it quite often. What does it mean? Where does it come from? Is it in our DNA? Is it the Demiurge?  I won’t answer that in the book but I am someone who asks the question which leads to the response in the government that I write about here.

It's funny that competition is the name of the game for all of us to the point that losing means dying in our own filth on the street, but cooperation is the name of the game and is good enough among wealthy corporations price gouging and merging and consolidating monopolies all across the market and buying politicians who forgo democratic competition in elections and get selected by and large by very wealthy people with cooperating interests.

Because of this basic cognition that I share in this preface and other examples of my cognition that I share later in this book, I have been singled out in a grandiose thought experiment. In this book, I will discuss my observations of what is called “The Targeted Individual Program.” Those claiming to be subject to the program are often ridiculed in the press, when they are even acknowledged at all, as “tin foil hat” kooks.  This has been the line to dismiss people experiencing schizophrenia for nearly a century who complain of exotic or covert experimentation by the government, private organizations or intelligence agencies. The whole “tin foil hat” defense and incredulity play doesn’t really work when the former Chairman of India’s Joint Intelligence Committee is writing articles declaring that China has far advanced cognitive control weapons and “neurostrike" weapons in which he states that “common people” are the primary targets. For journalists to promote "tin foil hat," I mean It’s like saying 2+2 = 7. It is a blatant lie that cannot stand up to any sort of minimal intelligent examination of reality. Also, it’s quite clear that America is being duplicitous and manipulative. While I was writing this book, FBI Director Christopher Ray appeared on 60 Minutes and discussed China’s running a program called “Fox Hunt” in which Chinese dissidents around the world and in America are stalked, harassed and threatened with violence for opposing or being critical of the Chinese Communist Party or government officials.  I personally think China plays along because the technology, weaponry and tactics have been used in America with schizophrenics for a hundred years likely.

 In his speech before the Republican National Convention, Vice Presidential candidate and Senator, JD Vance joked about his grandma threatening to run over a drug dealer ( a child friend of her grandson) and Vance also joked about the idea of getting away with it as his grandma declared she no body would know. One thing that is happening is that there's covert warfare using vehicles as weapons. I experienced this first hand and experienced threats trying to terrorize me. It is in fact like a form of terrorism. I'm all for just using surveillance tools to respond in the sense of monitoring and tracking the culprits down and pressing charges. I may not press charges in my case were I able to track down culprits, but I think there should be a system in place to monitor this tactic.  Surveillance is the way of the world. It is done in the shadows and under the table regardless of whether we all want to pretend we are against the practice. There's shadowy groups utilizing these dirty tactics. Roadways should be monitored by satellite. We don't balk at monitoring stores so people can't steal Hello Kitty dolls, yet when lives are threatened on the highway, deliberately to terrorize, we just let it continue without bringing it into the light and responding. The tactic is a political surveillance connected tactic called "Vehicular Stallking" or Floating Box. More people die due to reckless and calculated crashes than by conventional terrorism. There needs to be public extensive surveillance by satellite of the roadways and people need to be prosecuted for threatening and reckless driving.

As I will discuss additionally later in the book people should be weary of possible false flags on micro and macro scale. as well as false flag fronts within false flag fronts. Fifth Columns are examples of this, but also could be representative of bigger Macro scale operations. Where there’s duplicity and manipulation, one should ask how deep the duplicity and manipulation goes. The flag or cause one espouses when murdering people is significant. It could evidently represent the driver of their actions or it could be the intent to paint those causes or the who or what the symbols represent in a negative light and set them up for retaliation. They could also be chess pieces.

I want to characterize myself as "Experiencing Schizophrenia" rather than "experiencing targeted individual program" because I feel there's a propaganda effort built into information or into the actual Targeted Individual program which dismisses schizophrenic experience as something not worth examining even given technological revelations as well as acknowledged widespread political or social behaviors. I also feel much of what happens in the Targeted Individual world is designed to harass people subject to the schizophrenic experience. I feel like a pawn otherwise, though I fully acknowledge it in this book that the Targeted Individual program does explain to some degree some sort of reality. We are told that to form solutions to problems one must address the problem to begin with. And solutions to Schizophrenia takes 1 percent of the population and determines that they have a chemical imbalance in their brain to be drugged rather than that they are people forming a front or in fact experiencing social behavior of political or other societies and technology intrusions upon their brain and body.

I experience the schizophrenic reality. I happen to know that some organization that is very powerful is reading my mind and interested and is in fact inside my brain and can even make my brain operate thought wise beyond my total control. They can send harassment voiced messages in other people's voices, which they do to disable me either for months but back in the day for 6 years or they can make me think thoughts in my own voice. They operate a paramilitary force of famous people and street level people, doctors, lawyers, businessman, customer service representatives, deliverymen, it is basically totally encompassing of society and people themselves can be remote controlled. This organization can be hostile and play with your sense of reality or they can be kind and jovial stroking your ego or conduct themselves in a way that they position themselves as spiritual teachers. They are basically running the government this way and may in fact be officially deployed by the government. Today this organization likes to lecture me on how to live my life, this being after they disabled and destroyed my life for over a decade. It is koo koo. Also, either this organization or another controls the weather and earth's geophysical systems. They will create natural disasters based on my daily activities and thought processes. They also will start wars, which I am uncertain of the veracity of destruction of life. I don't know at this point how much is psychological operations and how much dummies and fake explosions or controlled demolitions of countries are being conducted and how much of it is controlled violent chaos and destruction of life.

As I was writing this book I was reading the sequel to Clanlands. The first book was my favorite book I’ve read in a while. It is written by two actors, Graham MacTavish and Sam Heughan, who with Scottish buddy banter travel Scotland. Early in the Second book, MacTavish discusses the journey our ancestors might have made to send us where we are today.  In his particular case New Zealand and he discusses what would they think about people complaining about their movie selection on an airplane? I find that funny. I don’t often think about it in those terms. I usually think in terms of other humans living hardships today and I don’t like to complain about things that are just silly to complain about, but with the hostile life takeover of my life in experiencing schizophrenia and whatever the targeted individual program is, I do a fair bit of complaining about the way it ruined my life in its own unique way. I think a lot of times injustice stands because people are dismissed as complainers. I’m not meaning to complain about my life with this book, but to examine some absurdity and reality. I’m reminded of the Catholic teaching about how there’s always someone worse off than you. Or the pointing to terrible condition somebody endures to make you happy with your existence and blessings and its true I do have what are traditionally known as “blessings.” And there’s a temperance with that in both directions I think. For example, I think it can be used to condition us to accept barbarism or just minuscule unfairness or even gross unfairness. I’m struck by some of MacTavish’s sentiment, if even it was just a joke in passing writing, because I think it is a widely used cudgel by others. For instance, he makes a point to say our ancestors wouldn’t have much to think about veganism. And well I don’t know the totality of his attitude, but its possible or he seems to be holding onto an attitude of brutality makes a better world or people or at least lending some credence for people who clutch onto archaic ways to our detriment, if even there’s benefits to the ancient world emulation on some occasions.

I suppose there is a temperament we can call upon by remembering, either in art or print form, descriptions of the brutality of the past. Yet we are an evolving species and I am reminded of the idea which the Journalist Kaitlin Johnstone writes about that there is a development taking place with humanity where our brutality nearly wiped us all out, so we had to look inwards and try not to blow ourselves up and ascend to greater heights as a species. I think I am a fat monkey when I eat my farm raised fish which probably suffered in its pond. There’s something speaking this to me when I eat it. There’s a reminder of brutality and I’m not sure I’m meant to continue it. How important is it? I don’t know. Following this innate voice has been a little difficult with Schizophrenia. I don’t know when I am being led by an Artificial Intelligence and whether that intelligence should even be discarded. For instance, I often hear the sound of rain on my roof or outside while I am warm inside. I enjoy this sound as most people do and I actually think this sound and how we get joy out of the feeling is indicative of an innate knowing of purpose for us to build housing or shelter from the elements for us and others. I’ve had this thought ever since I was a child in school and knew of homeless people I think. I was disregarded perhaps at a young age as naïve, but this feeling and thought was a gnosis and is knowledge for humanity from the universe. Everybody has access to this type of knowledge. I hope my musing here in this book is an example for us to just use it.

What I think is that the schizophrenic is just relaying an abusive system. Even if at times the system is entertaining or there are periods where it is amusing, it is part of a greater abuse of someone's life and it often turns nasty. In my case, it is done to move chess pieces against me for being a humanist or liberal or socialist or a dissident or whistleblower or knowledge purveyor or for having a spiritual creativity. I don't like to use the terms because they are loaded but that’s the crux of the motive others have in manipulating the schizophrenic's life and abusing their existence.

Many people who are subjects or targets of counter intelligence operations discuss how they are slandered amongst the intelligence agencies and then in society by fusion center operations designed to turn associates, friends and family away from the target, so that they will become isolated. I have no way of knowing if any of this happened in my case, but I do know that the controllers in my case did try to paint me with certain characteristics to justify their abuse of me by security personnel and then would let me know they were doing so. At one point in my counter intelligence targeting it became clear that controllers were painting me as a racist who had to be stopped. It is unclear how serious of an accusation they were making. But they were policing me as if I was racist who wanted to stoke white supremacist groups.

 I believe that they were combatting political speech I made during the Libyan Bombings. I posted on social media during the Libyan Bombings, which resulted in intense gang-stalking harassment, that War Keeps Order for Cannibal System. I clearly had white general/officer on the picture to indicate that white people are cannibals to remind that slave masters used to tell stories about themselves as cannibals to terrorize slaves, but they pass propaganda to characterize others that way as well. I was referencing the Rolling Stone article, which practically showcased a story of U.S soldiers cutting up an Afghan casualty, chopping off his fingers among other gruesome mutilations.  Meanwhile the psyops managers sit back and also play to another audience and show radical Muslims as cannibals when they commit atrocities. Both sides keep committing atrocities, and then the other side sees the age old cannibal people that they have to civilize with their civilization or religion and other cultural behaviors as with old propaganda. It is the same colonial system. And then I was alluding to a system which produces homeless veterans as well and to a system in which we profit off misery and eat eachother up in competitive economy with opposing interests for the public good and individual good. But this was utilized to provide feedback as if I was promoting white Supremacy, which is the opposite of what I was saying. It was also about myself as a writer etc and about surveillance, but it was interpretive. Finally, it was to make reference to the way propaganda has different meanings to different audiences by design. It was done to make commentary on violence perpetuated amongst opposing races of people. But I clearly made it acknowledging it was analyzing a perspective of Americans as a Caucasian or European American

While the system may be a cannibal system and we eat each other up, propagandists have been also characterizing us all as rather useless deadweight unless we create some value for rich people. So while I think there can be some scope in which this is an element to an economy. This is a bizarre ultimate measuring of human beings and their value. My family and I used to want to start the We Party, but since politics are run by wealthy elitist interests in both political parties or the uber talented and system is what it is like in theory it rewards talented hard workers, which is not necessarily a bad thing because it incentivizes quality and beauty in production and art for one thing, yet incentivizes over expenditure of energy and life in worklife on the other hand.  I think but maybe the rest of us need a Party of the Worthless for what Henry Kissinger used to call the Useless Eaters. Our interests deserve representation in this thing we call democracy. I guess if the worthless have any amount of success, maybe we can rebrand as the "Party of the Worthy." In reality it should start at worthy. Perhaps this populist idea can take on a life of its own or get infiltrated and undermined or redirected to disparate ends or cause disdainful ignorant backlash or unnecessary conflict. I’m basically half joking here. However I seriously do think that often, what our system of hoards of wealth among the richest tiny fraction does is brainwash and reward the talented among us to value work above all else, then provide little support in a job training or environment or monetary expenditure to everyone on the whole and even will actively try to undermine us and drive us crazy. Then it will pass off the dysfunction of the system as just due to the lack of healthy work ethic and idiocy of the rest of us. Schizophrenia is one manifestation of this practice.

One aspect of schizophrenia is a determination by a psychiatrist that the schizophrenic cannot determine what is real versus what is fake. It is a devaluing of their ability to discern reality and thus the residency of their opinion or analysis socially or the schizophrenic’s value socially or politically. What I contend in this book or what I reveal as thoughts I have is that I believe war has a hidden multifacetation to it and that it is done for multiple objectives, with a main objective being that it is a big Cultural Production. The war planners conducting various wars are trying to build some sort of cultural edifice in global society. I believe that when the entity that runs the world plans a war, that they consider how various populations of the world will respond to the atrocity and how they will digest the violence or intellectual fodder or the media and relationships of those connected to the war. Of course, there is terror involved in threatening a people or attacking a people that is instructional for other peoples as bombastic punishment to terrorize those resisting a particular political order. Yet of course human nature is to fight back and organize in response, which I believe is a factored into phased operations of wars. Now once one takes Big Brother into account the question becomes what is the veracity of the destruction and what is the way the destruction and violence is used as chess pieces? Part of this inlcudes duplicity and manipulation including in that the knowledge that most political people understand that duplicity and manipulation is the name of the game and that any organized operation will include some amount of conspiracy. For instance, when The New York Times ran a story in the middle of Israeli war on Palestinians that Israeli Intelligence knew of an attack like October 7th could take place a year in advance, my question becomes.. well hmm here is demonstrative duplicity and manipulation, so how deep does it go? Why is an entity like the NY Times granted sanction for or running a story like this for me to digest?

One thing that is seemingly happening is that wars and protests are phased operations blurring lines and muddying the waters on what is an acceptable idea or thought or economic or political action. Like for instance, after the breakdown of encampments on college campuses in protest to Israeli war on Palestine for Hamas Hostage taking and October 7th attack, on the news I heard a lady who was a CEO for some company that helps people find jobs in Southern California. The CEO said that it may be difficult for protestors to find jobs because they were part of an illegal operation and that they "crossed the line" and the news segment reiterated that opportunities for protestors may be limited. To me it seems the biggest obvious crimes committed as I witnessed the encampments on tv was the defacing of property and building an encampment, then there were ‘clashes” in which thugs were sent in to have a big fight. To me this is all an operation to normalize repercussions and limited opportunities or penalties or controlling speech and political activity. Perhaps that is one cultural edifice of or the product of the war and the factored in or orchestrated ‘reaction’ to it.

Caitlin Johnstone writes "that what is happening in Gaza should be radicalizing you" and my question here is what if what is happening in Gaza or in other wars around the world is "meant" to radicalize people in reaction to atrocity. What if the game is to put people in radicalized camps muddying the political waters of acceptable behavior so that the government or various political factions have triggered excuse to pass draconian laws or revolutionize military affairs? What if the people in wars are being sacrificed for unstated political objectives? What if the purpose is to normalize sacrificing lives for political objectives?

I wouldn't be surprised if the whole Hamas attack was an Israeli false flag for division and elimination of progressives in U.S congress. It certainly seems to have awoken medieval religious kooks and has divided college campuses and made college less attractive to those who don't want to get into medieval battles or join either side of religious kooks. Protestors for Palestine are going around submitting statements to the media that "college is a small privilege" simultaneous to media or organized effort to dismiss college as unlucrative waste of money or time and push the idea that everyone should become a plumber. I don’t think that America will be immune from more normalization of divestment and sanctions on the world stage, which would affect students even affording college in the future. Also. Divestment and sanctions are brutal and hypocritical for any person who has witnessed America's behavior for a century.

I guess I find it curious or always have that there are different factions in Israel and Judaism, and I’ve read in passing that some Zionists who were very powerful in Europe aided Nazis politically because it achieved an envisioned objective, then there are different factions in Palestinian society with radical Islamists, another Abrahamic religion that shares the same god as Christians and Jews and these drastically religious Islamists were actually supported in Palestine by Israel which took a hard line and then these two religions who share the same god as non secular Christianity have seemingly divided students at American intellectual institutions and have shut down intellectual institutions at a time where there is organized effort to make higher education or university too expensive and push country’s youth into trades. What do kids think when they see college students being reduced to medieval combatants with clubs while police back away? I think they may say I’m becoming a hair dresser or a plumber. Not that someone can’t be an intellectual or learned person or intelligent plumber or hair dresser and they are good jobs that I readily admit could be better options financially or socially. What does limiting trust or interest in college do to the intellectual growth of the country? Abrahamic religions have long had an anti-intellectual and anti-free spirit bent to them, which college largely combats traditionally in America. So I question radicalization as part of this organized violence and war process. To what objective exactly are we being radicalized for? Is it not the least bit curious that college campuses are being reduced to medieval combat zones like happened at UCLA? That certainly would help religious violent males rule the day as has been the case for thousands of years.

If wars are somewhat stunt operations masquerading some sort of other operation or creating a type of culture, the question is, what is the aim? Why hide a form of rule or reality? Are there humans residing in the starry sky? On other planets? Or humanoids? Are we the only monkey mutants? Is the technology such as torsion field or antigravity ancient on earth? Are we part of a big front operation or a veil over humanity's advanced breakaway civilization? The more energy people feed a conflict with, the less other issues get addressed or have time to enter into problem solving capacities of all our brains. Perhaps this is the purpose of war. To create general confusion in all our brains. What role did these possible intergalactic fairing civilizations have in World War II?

As reiterated again and again by this author, where there's demonstrative duplictity and manipulation, one should ask how deep does the duplicity and manipulation go? Religiona and State is a demonstrative conspiracy. It is a culture of conspiracy, duplicity and manipulation.

With regards to the specter of nuclear annihilation I find that competition based world leads inevitably to this outcome. One thing I have found is that I agree with John Wooden’s contention that the best person to compete with is yourself. Competition has a place to achieve a bit of fun, but I find that people competing and trying to outperform each other is a sickness in humanity aided by economic and political systems that ultimately ends in disgusting behavior by humans and annihilation. I say this as someone who enjoyed sports much of my life and as a kid felt fair play of sport was a refuge, ( I still enjoy sports and competition as a game) but it's more than just a pastime in scheme of nation building for people in charge. While its also a distraction, which could be good and bad, Sports is used to mold the masses in respective Nations. It conditions you at a young age to compete with your peers and join groups competing with each other. Coaches all say they are teaching you about life and condition you to see life as a game while revering elite rich people and it sorts obedient brainwashed people into a system which is based on individuals and groups atomized and separated, competing for approval by Oligarchs and elite societies and each other, all of whom judge who is worthy of a quality life and subsistence and power. Oligarchs fund and control sports and athletes, who condition the public to revere production machines and act as ambassadors for capitalism as multimillionaires. They also condition the public to ridicule humans like production machines and brands etc.

What I like about the idea of capitalism is that you can conceivably have some choice or autonomy and a piece of property, but what I don’t like is that we all become production machines competing with each other for essential resources guided by accumulating wealth for rich people. Society takes work. There's some crossover appeal of successful hard work paying off into meritocracy as controllers of capital in society, but that's not necessarily descriptive of how system works, and it ignores people as human beings deserving of basic dignity. Also, people who produce a lot shouldn't necessarily dictate economy, which is an obvious problem. I personally would probably prefer it if we split everything like duties, resources and income equally in society, but not everybody is like me, so i don't want to make everybody do that. Also, duties would be difficult to parse out equally, but that's another issue. So, I'm for socialism as a medium between greed and equality. Something that ensures dignity and sustenance for everyone where we realize we are individuals but also responsible for the condition of humanity and earth and the life on it. I think we need to cement human rights like housing, food, clean water, medical care, living wage for disabled and living wage jobs for the abled as amendments to constitution. Why can't we be working 3-4 days a week 5-6 hours a day? We consume many unnecessary bad for you things because we are conditioned in survive mass produce mass consume system. Everyone who’s able could be employed and trained to share workload on necessary or worthwhile endeavors. Why do we require such big salaries or long hours to pay for necessities? Work should be for extra goods services. I think we need to make paycheck necessary for less necessities and guarantee food. I suggest we either have a Universal Basic Income or guarantee housing as a right, lower rent and guarantee healthcare.

 Upon finishing this book I was reminded of the belief I have which I'm sure has been monitored and registered somewhere by a Supercomputer. I saw a lady chastise people who are socialists and she cited a professor who failed his class after they gave the average grade for all grades on tests. The professor was upset that the class thought socialism could work so he took individual grades away and gave collective grades and the class lost motivation. The lady used this example of how people stopped being motivated to learn as a reflection on the feasibility of socialism.

But I believe that humans can be motivated by more than just starvation, deprivation and riches. You can develop a culture that functions highly outside this paradigm. Will it develop with a professor trying to prove it can't and undermining motives outside individual achievement amongst a lose group of college students? No.

Currently civilization runs off the motivation to not starve, be homeless or other deprivations and gives privileges through riches. I don't think that these are even the best motivating agents for human beings. Certainly not the best to build an entire civilization off of. To some extent the reason our system doesn't crumble now is because people actually, individually, are motivated by more and provide cultural value to our species because of other motivations besides individual achievement. I think humans can develop to be motivated in other ways.

This leads to some of my thoughts on Money and business, which I believe are also monitored by various organizations. What should the role be of money and business ideally on earth? It would seem that a global economy is needed to pull all resources and cooperate to solve the world’s problems. But I don't think money can be king to the point of being the object at the pinnacle dictatorship of economy. Like We shouldn't have an economy in which market forces supersede the survival of life on earth and the greater ecosystems. It is useful to provide some unifying mode valuing labor and goods that everybody buys into. Businesses provide avenues for subsistence and creativity which people democratically vote for with their patronage. I think there should be some commonwealth which meets the basic needs of people and that this should be the general point of the economy. Everyone's well being and happiness should be the aim of our culture and politics within the bounds of earths living survival and sustainability. I also don't want to live in a world where Social Sciences or Arts, Liberal Arts or Humanities get replaced by economic factors like job plugging or universities geared solely toward getting students a job. Like there's more to civilization than that. Social or human development, history and arts are all necessary.

I’ve heard it declared that revolting doesn’t have to be a coup. I find that may be possibly true. Also, I don't think that people who only value you for your revolutionary capacity and not as a human being living a life have your best interest at heart, just like people who only value you for your mental or physical productive capacity or productive capacity in the economy don’t. So, let this book be my contribution to consciousness and search for truth be it part of a revolution or not. On some level it is my revolt.

While necessary types of revolution may take shape via various avenues besides coups, I look forward to election day because I think that democracy is the best way forward to affect change in America in the future. As I will re-iterate later, I think that Trump and Biden have totally tanked or tarnished the presidency and by virtue of destabilizing the highest democratic office have undermined democracy. Biden often says that he is trying to save democracy and campaigns on saving democracy. If you were powerful political organizations interested in saving democracy or the idea of it, I think the last person you’d have as your messenger is Joe Biden. This makes me think Joe Biden is a shill. I think that due to the two-party system, there aren't very many, if any, quality candidates to choose from. In fact, it seems like the powers that be are deliberately placing sorry to say, but schmucky candidates for office or politicians in order to entice a revolt of some kind. But the question I have is to what end? Do they have some other non-democratic solution to the world's or the country's problems. Is this going to be an ugly controlling thing with the rule of violence? I'm a little weary of the culture in America having a violent revolution, as the only revolution of that sort occurred 250 years ago and protected slavery. There is the Chaos theory of the world, that the leaders like to create chaos and then amidst the chaos they can bring about order or thrive in chaos. As far as voting vs nonvoting goes, I don't think it makes much of a difference if I vote vs not voting. I'm not likely to bring along everybody in either scenario. I didn't vote in 2012. I didn't vote for president in 2016. I voted in 2020. I voted in 2022. I do think there is a difference in which party gets control, however there are overlapping oppressions that they doll out on respective populations almost like they are holding people hostage and trying to divide people.

So perhaps we can take these conflicts and find synthesis where we have it and acknowledge where our ideologies fail and we can create some political economic system that is new drawing on what has worked in the past with and what wasn't tried as humans, but without inward peace of mind and freedom how do we do this?

"To have inward solitude and space is very important because it implies freedom to be, to go, to function, to fly. After all, goodness can only flower in space just as virtue can flower only when there is freedom. We may have political freedom but inwardly we are not free and therefore there is no space. No virtue, no quality that is worthwhile, can function or grow without this vast space within oneself. And space and silence are necessary because it is only when the mind is alone, uninfluenced, untrained, not held by infinite varieties of experience, that it can come upon something totally new." Krishnamurti

Chapter 1

Fate of The Boogey Man: From Gargoyles, Taz and Batman to an Ample Search for Truth in Plato's Cave

On October 22, 2019 I decided to write this book. It is part musing of one human rights victim- part publishing established facts and personal observations regarding the “targeted individual program," based on my experience. It often feels like what I say and reveal hardly registers for people.  I mostly wrote this book to organize my own thinking and though I believe my handlers want me to write the book, I'm not sure what I actually write has their approval or pleases them. In fact, I believe they have conducted themselves in a manner in which I could be deemed at fault for insanity in the world and atrocities. They have made things dangerous for me to the point that they are willing to position me as responsible for all terrible things to undermine the book. Perhaps what they have done in Israel and Gaza is an attempt to muddy the waters and undermine this book and the effect of my brain’s analysis to further obscure examination and the entertaining of what I write here.

I know that Intelligence Agencies are interested in what I have to write and other secret societies, or what was commonly referred to as Big Brother in the past. I think they are interested because it examines a system of their control and manipulation. I know that what I write isn't really written as far as some of it goes anywhere else, so it is groundbreaking in that tiny little sense in that it is in print form going to the public. But I'm not special. Some people have this knowledge. Some do not. Some have no interest. Some won't touch it with a ten foot pole.

There's a tactic that intelligence agencies or organizations will use in which they run an operation for the purposes of gaining trust in individuals. Usually, they will use an antagonist to accomplish this. I believe that is one motive for targeting me, they are trying to create trust in me. Meanwhile, they are attempting to manipulate me and manage my perception or others’ perception of me in a type of open air re-education camp of sorts. I do the best I can to just tell what I see and think here and elsewhere, while not buying into manipulation. I for one, really hate this culture of using people and their lives as pawns to “expose a problem.” This is taking place on a wide scale for counter intelligence purposes and social engineering purposes. As I will keep reminding later in the book, when there’s demonstratively duplicity and manipulation you should ask the scope of the duplicity and manipulation. Like if there’s something you become aware of, was it intended you become aware of it? When people draw up war plans, I know they factor in conclusions to be drawn by various populations.

This book is a mental exploration into something that is terribly wrong. When I was a child, I would most days play a sport or go to the Boys and Girls Club after school or throughout the summer, but some days I just wanted to go to my Grandma's apartment, eat cookies and watch Gargoyles, Tasmanian Devil, or Batman. Often times, I would wait for the Laker or Dodger game to watch with her. My grandma would listen to the radio 24 hrs a day and typically had KNX 1070 on, which was a running log of the news. On some level, this played a little bit of a role and influenced me to want to know what was happening in the world. As a target of gangstalking, the world sort of ate me up and spit me out and upon returning home to live with my parents, it was sort of like going to grandma’s to eat cookies before I could return to the sports. I was supposed to go back into the world, but alas this book is one step into it.  This analogy of sport as metaphor for life I will touch upon in small brush strokes at the end of the book when I discuss thoughts, I have had that, possibly, were reason for being selected for an experimental Artificial Intelligence brain control and weapons testing program which though a very real reality, did in fact program me into schizophrenic mind permanently. If the experiment were to stop, I would not be able to stop my mind from taking in reality in a schizophrenic manner.

The shows I reference in the title of this chapter had an effect on me as a programming, as Gargoyles made me a little bit mindful of evil spirits and protecting people from them, Batman made me suspicious, and Taz made me a bit goofy. I reference Tasmanian devil because my writing is all over the place and a whirlwind like Taz. I reference Batman because it’s part detective fighting off jokers. I reference Gargoyles because my writing is like a grotesque frozen in time statue coming to life fighting off evil spirits. Gargoyles I learned are possibly symbols for reptilian ET race which Michael Salla says are a “good shepherd” faction. Gargoyles are often dragon-like, and dragons are possibly historically referring to Draco star system or Draco star system is reference to Dragons. Dragons are a cosmic spark like Sophia which is the Goddess that Philosophy is named after, which leads us to Plato and his allegory of the cave. Much like a child's cartoon, the programming we receive through mainstream media and psychological operations have typically a villain or fallen hero of some kind that become boogey men and whose fate we are enthralled by while desiring particular outcomes for. 

 In Plato's Allegory of the Cave, he describes a theoretical scenario to his students. He describes prisoners chained with their heads positioned to look at a wall in a cave in which shadows from people outside the cave appear. Plato supposes that the prisoners, having been prisoners since they were children, would have thought that this reality of the shadows was the one true reality and that the voices outside of passersby were actually made by the shadows. Upon one of the prisoners being led out of the cave, Plato supposes that this prisoner would be blinded by the light and wouldn't be able to take in the reality of the upper world outside the cave. Before long, eventually adjusting to the light in the night sky and the light of the day, the escaped prisoner would be able to make sense of the new reality. However, if the escaped prisoner returned to the cave and shadow world to state what he knew, he would be scoffed at by the other prisoners who only knew the cave and the shadows. Plato supposes that the awards and medals given to the prisoners for their interpretations of the shadows, or their accolades would be uninteresting to the ascended prisoner who had seen the other reality and he would pity the prisoners. Plato says that this allegory is about the soul ascending and seeing the worlds of the light. Plato eventually goes on to say that the State's job is to ascend souls and enlighten them.

It's quite possible that what I describe in the following pages of this book is some society's attempt to bring Plato's Allegory of The Cave to life, at least with an extra tweaked vision. Perhaps the thought process is this notion that gets passed around a lot in society: that you don't grow unless you are out of your comfort zone. The people who conduct this program, I believe, treat it like a soul ascension task. That's why churches participate and religious people. It is twisted or tweaked logic, but I believe that's their logic. They think abuse makes people stronger and introducing people to evil fulfils some purpose. To me, it’s just false to say that “growth doesn’t happen in your comfort zone.” Nature nourishes for growth pretty regularly and as far as humanity goes, the whole point of civilization is to provide comfort through cooperation in order that humanity grows. The prisoners in Plato's cave couldn't have been very comfortable being chained up and trapped inside.  When you leave the cave, you become one of the boogeymen. I suppose it's up to interpretation what's more comfortable, being ignorant and chained in a dark cave or being aware of the world while walking around outside.

On December 19th 2022, upon compiling this book and doing Christmas shopping, I was returning home in my car and stopped at a light. Riding across the street on a bicycle was a guy who I observed and thought to myself that "I think that guy is supposed to be a doppelganger for a young Brad Pitt." Then, immediately after, was a commercial on Coast 103.5 that had a movie preview and it said, "starring Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie!" Then Brad Pitt's voice came on the radio and said, "You have to see it to believe it!" Much of what I write about in the following pages may being conducted with that thought in mind, that you have to see it to believe it. What I'd say is that there's enough information out there where you don't necessarily need to see it yourself but need to hear and listen to others' experiences and then inform yourself about organizations, systems and technologies capable of, along with motives to bring about a reality that people share experiencing. 

 “Any attempt to understand the world which fails to take into account the fact that extremely powerful people are pouring massive amounts of money and resources into manipulating your understanding of the world will necessarily result in a distorted worldview.”

-Rogue journalist-Caitlain Johnstone

“Some state secrets come out in dribs and drabs, becoming more damning along the way, and the phenomenon is hardly new.”

-Jon Elliston

What I wouldn't find on KNX 1070 News was that the government conducts biosurveillance and mind reading surveillance, even passing laws as recently as the Obama Administration's 2016 law that tried to legalize 'neurosurveillance.' (1) In one of the dribs and drabs secret reveals, to borrow from the Jon Elliston quote above, the alternative news outlet lifesitenews.com ran the headline, "Obama-Biden administration legalized ‘neurological surveillance’ after Trump’s election." It was not reported on when it happened as there are thousands of pages of laws that get lost in the shuffle and deliberately hidden from the public through omission in most outlets. In fact, I believe its revelation in an outlet like lifenews.com is a way to undermine the truth. Caitlin Johnstone has written about how Tucker Carlson functioned this way. She stated that he functioned as a way to hide the truth by using his reputation to discredit the truthfulness of a story. If people see a story coming from Carlson, they will look the other way and consider the source. 

On The United Nations website is a PDF by the Advocacy group called Advocacy for Humankind (AFH). The PDF is titled: Open Secret: The Growing Problem of Cybertorture via Coordinated Stalking. (2) There are in fact 10s of thousands of people online describing being subject to this coordinated Stalking, which is widely termed "gangstalking," as well as mind reading, biotech directed energy weapons and voice hearing or synthetic telepathy. The corporate owned newspapers like the New York Times say they are all experiencing a "mass delusion."(3)

During World War II it has been documented that the United States engaged in a massive secretive operation to develop nuclear weapons called The Manhattan Project. In her book on Area 51, Annie Jacobsen called the Manhattan Project the mother of all blackops programs and stated that it is "the parent from which all other blackops projects stem." (4) As part of this massive secretive operation, whole cities were employed to be operating in secret to achieve the goal of nuclear powered weapons.  Well, here are a list of books to read that give some historical background on players and people subject to the Manhattan style project that goes on in our society today. If it was a mass delusion, then why have all these well respected and well credentialed people written all these books either directly acknowledging it or about the technological capabilities and motives to conduct brain control operations being real. They happen not to work for corporations running the media:

1. Thy Will Be Done by Gerald Colby and Charlotte Dennett

2. Gangstalking Threat to Humanity by Dr. Corkin Cherubini

3. Poisener In Chief by Steven Kinzer

4. Nazi Hydra in America by Glenn Yeadon

5. Project Soulcatcher by Dr. Robert Duncan

6. Monarch The New Phoenix Program by Marshal Thomas

7. The Pheonix Program by Douglas Valentine

8. 1996 by Gloria Naylor

9. Battle for Your Brain by Nita A. Farahany

10. Psychic Dictatorship by Alex Constantine

This is by no means an exhaustive list of books in society describing this system or technology and elements or motives found in it. I am not as prolific a writer nor am I even a scholar such as these authors, but I hope this book will contribute some toward an understanding and provide some research on the subject as it is written as a research subject myself. Basically, I hope to make a contribution in research as a victim research subject. So, in a bizarre way, this is the prevalence of the brain control research program coming to fruition even as I am trying to respond to my rights being taken and abused in what is perceptible to me as my small rebellion in thought.

Greater rebellions than the thought crime of this book are taking place in the form of court cases and lawsuits. There are in fact numerous court cases, which are either in process or that have happened in which citizens have sued the United States Government for abusing their rights. It may sound incredible to some, but citizens have been targeted with Directed Energy Weapons causing them brain damage. In a recent Lawsuit, Conlon v. Miller, Ryan Mathew Conlon sued Connor Miller, the CIA Department of Defense (DOD) and Airforce for targeting him with Directed Energy Weapons. I believe that ultimately the judge ruled that the plaintiff didn't provide the court with sufficient evidence that DOD and the Airforce targeted them. The United Nations is also currently investigating governments around the world and their usage of Cybertorture and Cybertechnologies. (5) Public announcement of this UN investigation was followed by the Covid 19 outbreak.  Public hearings of Conlon v Miller was anticipated with or followed by brinksmanship in Ukraine. In Chapter 7, I submit to the reader some writing I made previous to overt harassment and threats made upon me. The writing I submit discusses how I believe that the government or powerful institutions will use media and sensational events to knock other events out of the news which they are losing narrative control over. I question here whether brinksmanship in Ukraine isn’t somehow done to overshadow resistance to this covert brain control program, the scope of which surpasses the Manhattan Project. This resistance is being conducted with lawsuits.

Another resistance case I think is what has been dubbed a groundbreaking Targeted Justice Lawsuit where there are 17 or 18 people in a lawsuit suing in Texas. The purpose of the lawsuit is to receive damages for being put in experimental program and allegedly, the suit can prove that the plaintiffs began all receiving the same symptoms or experiences with weapons systems and harassment and stalking after being put on a terrorist watch list. Apparently, two plaintiffs were told by police that they were on a Non-Investigative Subjects list, which they are trying to get ruled unconstitutional. They are asking for 1.3 billion dollars. The Following is the text of the complaint

Proton Drive

2-main (4).pdf

A Moment to Inform About Me or “How I Got Here”

I'll pause here to give a short introduction. My name is Dominic Friscia. I was born in Burbank, CA and grew up in Santa Clarita, CA. I was raised Catholic and though I see church as useful in our society for people looking for community and doing works that go beyond themselves, I am not religious. I'll probably let out my own view or ponderings on religion and God later. I went to a catholic school called Our Lady of Perpetual Help elementary school and then to a public high school called William S. Hart High School. I graduated from UC Irvine with a bachelor’s degree in Global Cultures, an interdisciplinary humanities major. I submit this educational history because I know a lot of people argue or assert that targeting begins in school or that Catholics themselves and Rome is central to the program. I really have no idea. I pondered about Rome still being very powerful and that they haven't given up on world domination as a young kid in church. It should be noted here, as I do later in the book, that the Swiss Catholic Church is the only religious body I've come across openly acknowledging mind control as a serious or prevalent problem in society.

I believe that in the 90s when I was pondering these things about Rome that we were all, already, having our thoughts monitored by satellite. There is documented proof that satellite mind reading is undoubtedly established as possible and that mind reading is a public fact. As short or small introductory example, the following is an excerpt about Regina Dugan leaving Facebook, describing how she worked at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA for the military and then worked on mind reading phones for Facebook: (*need a date)

"Before Google, Dugan was the director of DARPA, the special research lab that builds new technology for the U.S. military. At Facebook, Dugan oversaw a number of hardware efforts, none of which have actually launched, including a video chat device and a smart speaker, according to Business Insider. Dugan also lead the company’s “brain computer interface project,” a new type of technology meant to translate a person’s thoughts directly from their brain and onto a computer screen. Dugan unveiled the project onstage at Facebook’s annual developers conference in April."(6)

This mindreading technological development by facebook has recently in 2021 culminated so far with mind reading wristbands.

As far as Rome goes, I do know that my mom once heard voice to skull voices while in a Catholic Church when she was younger before I was born and that when I visited Rome, I and a cousin got hit with directed energy weapons after cracking a joke in the Sistine Chapel. I don't remember what was said. It’s unclear to me the significance of these childhood thoughts and I understand today that there’s a greater global integration beyond Rome.

When I first learned I was being targeted and finding Motives of covert orgs:

 I began writing this document about 9 years after becoming aware that I was a human rights victim or a target of what is called “Security Services Stalking,” also known as Gangstalking. I write it with brain damage which was possibly caused by Directed Energy Weapons experimentation on me like has been reported with Havana Syndrome by other current and former government employees as well as citizens. I also write it within bouts of harassment by FBI CIA NSA Homeland Security etc.  It is something that my handlers have wanted me to do as well as make videos. I believe that they actually want me to write this book. And I will reiterate here that although I believe they want me to write the book, I’m not sure what I actually write is satisfying or wanted in the end. There's a general script that I don't really follow with regards to my whole programming.

In the Summer of 2009, I was 24 years old. I applied for and accepted a government Americorps job at for a nonprofit that builds houses in San Diego. I had been suspicious that certain people at my previous employer, a nonprofit that provides interactive art space and exhibits for children, were conducting surveillance on behalf of the government or somebody else. At the time, it was a bit ambiguous. One of these people, whose mother worked at the Pentagon, recruited me to Americorps and I foolishly thought it would be a good chance to figure out why these people were so interested in me that they would infiltrate my workplace and spy on me. The lady who recruited me would tell me “have you tried therapy?” This was unbeknownst to me was some code for cult life control, destruction and discrediting of me as someone with basic social standing.  I did not know at the time that my thoughts were being monitored. I applied for and accepted a position at Americorps in San Diego. At the time, I was decently politically active by going to meetings at a church on behalf of the organization, San Diego Coalition for Peace and Justice, and had been participating in some protests. My memory escapes me, but some of them had to do with the drone bombings or pro immigrant rallies as well. The meetings at San Diego Coalition for Peace and Justice were small meetings, just a handful of activists. At the time, I was very interested in the Guatemalan Genocide and the fact that thousands of people in San Diego had reported being victims of torture at one point in their lives. I saw California as an international headquarters and the governance and intelligence structure as being global.  This is not to parrot Alex Jones or the common propaganda on the internet that devalues Human Rights or International Law, or the idea of global governance, agreed upon democratically. I had various social justice interests or ideas; one interest was Universal Jurisdiction and another idea was that I thought that it was a good idea to make housing a constitutional right in America. I reasoned, at the time, that if the Second Amendment was enacted to protect property so that you are a secure person, then a right to the housing to secure yourself, housing that the gun protected, wasn’t unreasonable. I just offer that as an example of information that the government had on me when they were conducting their surveillance and then funneled me into Americorps building houses.

While at Americorps, I worked on building projects that had volunteers from many major defense and intelligence contractors, as well as a project sponsored by Luis Palau, a preacher with close ties to the Guatemalan Dictator Efrain Rios Montt, responsible for genocide in Guatemala. One defense contractor or intelligence contractor was the company in which Richard Helms was CEO at one point. The information about Helms has since been deleted from public places on the internet, so I can’t remember what company he was alleged to be CEO of.  In accordance with the erasure, it is apt to remind the reader that Richard Helms has been revealed to be instrumental in destroying evidence of the MK Ultra mind control programs run during the 1960s and 1970s. I do know when I was at the nonprofit house building organization, before being hit with synthetic telepathy or v2k in later years (In Chapter 2 I tell how synthetic telepathy is alleged by former DARPA Senior Scientist, Dr. Paul Batcho, to be targeted at people through Cell Towers), I sat at lunch with regular volunteers who discussed working for Bechtel in Guatemala for the CIA and told me I could “go down there.” Richard Helms at least worked as a consultant for Bechtel.  In about May of 2010, I became fully aware that I was being stalked and harassed by some organization. I had previously been suspicious. I detail the incident in which I became fully aware due to an assassination attempt later in this book. I finished the year at the house building non profit and eventually contacted Katherine Hughes, a journalist, and informed her of a discrimination case against a Muslim Family at the nonprofit in San Diego. Upon finishing my year, I decided to regroup and moved home to Saugus, CA with my parents, thinking some organization in San Diego was harassing and threatening me. I reasoned that I would be able to let things die down and thought of positives like saving money etc. It is possible that I got blacklisted here, because I applied for numerous positions and thought I was qualified and didn't get hired, but I don't know. People would make gestures in interviews that were gangstalking gestures. I eventually decided going back to school for a teaching credential or Master’s Degree was my best avenue forward, but during this time the voice to skull attacks began and gangstalking ratcheted up debilitating me. I am now brain damaged and operate considerably slower than before.

 I attended protests upon moving back to Saugus. The protests were in Los Angeles. One protest held by the anti war group ANSWER was against the Libyan bombings conducted by the Obama administration. During this time, I was working on a blog post titled War Subverts Reality which I submit to the reader in chapter 9. I’ll briefly describe the blog as questioning whether war was a cultural production, questioning war propaganda and I drew attention to the possible commemoration of dates in which people were assassinated on previous assassination dates, war instigations on political leaders’ birthdays or bombing campaigns started on exact dates of previous bombing campaigns. 3 days after going to the ANSWER Protest, I was followed into a Starbucks by 2 women, identifying themselves as police officers, and through a tactic called Directed Conversation, they proceeded to state that they "F*ck people up when they least suspect it" and stated that I had "crossed the line." 3 days after that, on April 13th, my Grandpa’s death date, I was attacked in a staged car crash traveling on the freeway. I narrowly escaped a car that pulled parallel to me for 5 -10 seconds then jerked quickly into my lane spinning out of control. When I reported this to anybody, I was designated a paranoid schizophrenic. I was told I was diseased, genetically defective and nobody believed what I was describing happening to me.

 Later when participating in Occupy Los Angeles, I was involved in a protest at Bank of America. While being encircled by police in what was a peaceful sit in, a plainclothed bald white protestor in a gas mask signaled to a bald white policeman on the rubber bullet gun to target me. The policeman tried to intimidate me and was smiling that I was aware of their communication and conspiring.  I can't remember why I didn't just say out loud to everyone "This guy is working with the police" when the bald protestor in a gas mask signaled to police on gun to target me. Why didn't I confront the situation head on? I must have been confounded by the scope of the conspiracy including the car attack incident and the police threats which preceded it. I kept it to myself and then shortly after shadowy political groups used some sonic weapon or microwave weapon perhaps to send the voices which resulted in Schizophrenia diagnosis as a cover. A cover which has been ongoing ever since.

 I am, rather, just a research subject of high tech covert weapons and social engineering programs. The Pentagon, which has sucked 25 plus trillion dollars of direct money to perpetually conjure up ways to control people through physical and psychological violence since it's dedication September 11th, 1941, has nothing better to do, but psychologically abuse people while they engage in even the most mundane activities. I’m not functioning at full capacity and I will reiterate later that I have brain damage from the brain control experiment I’ve been subject to I believe. In fact, Chapter 9 in which I share the Blog post War Subverts Reality, was written 12 years ago and demonstrates this difference in capacity. I think it was of higher quality than the book I manage here. So I thank you for reading it. And while I may have had a higher functioning brain in 2010-2011 before Directed Energy Weapons attacks, I am now more knowledgeable and, relatively, have greater understanding of the world. However, the world as pointed out by Caitlin Johnstone is being manipulated to thwart this acquisition of knowledge in order to distort our world view at unprecedented levels.

My dream of dreams was to improve this book so much before publishing, that I sell 100,000 copies or more and help my mom retire maybe obtain some income. My expectation is that I will sell 10. But that’s not why I wrote the book. The motivating force while writing nearly all of this book was that I was providing record for research on this program and a record of “how I got here” with regards to my perspective and knowledge or experience in it for after I die and to whoever reads it and is interested in it. For this reason, I play the Lotto and perhaps the v2k that I receive is intergalactic intelligence and some Alien force connected to the Universal force that I suspect rights follies on occasion of this Earth’s God or Gods and wants me to win the lotto. A tiny possibility. In some respects, I’ve already won a lottery of sorts having a roof over my head, a little income to eat a burrito once a week made brilliantly by somebody else and spending 60 bucks a month to go to a nice gym, buy books to read and take care of my health pleasantly lap swimming and now write this book for a record for now and after I die. I’ve gotten to spend a lot of time with my family which is immeasurable as far as I’m concerned. And I’m alive. And, in some respects, I didn’t win the Lotto in that I was disabled by a weapons system, had my livelihood taken, was treated like a lab rat, had my twenties and thirties taken from me, was ostracized and tortured for a number of years. Neither perspective is outright wrong. It was asked of various victims of this non-consensual research program to submit information to a government hearing on the “weaponization of the FBI.” The prompt was how has this program affected your life or affected you? And so, I never submitted my response to the committee because I feel like a pawn being used by them, but here is what I offer to other targets whom may find overlapping themes or experiences for their own understanding:

I don't know where to begin. Firstly, I'm not sure where the targeting begins and ends. Like I think it ruined my interpersonal relationships, made me isolated, disabled, brain damaged, financially destitute, limited my professional development and I'm considered insane by society and treated as if I am diseased or genetically inferior. It's caused me trauma by abuses. It made me distrustful of other human beings, damaged my sense of self or identity. This is just the basics of it. It stole my ideas, has taken away privacy, shared my intimate moments and whole life with strangers who then harass me or dehumanize me. Treated me like a lab rat, used emotional bonds and revoked them and made it so that i didn't have emotional bonds like a monkey experiment. It almost treated me like a sex trafficking victim at times. It Treated me like a human trafficking victim. Turned basic human activities like eating food into life and death terrorist games. Irrevocably gave me schizophrenic outlook on reality. Drugged me with possibly damaging medication, tortured me physically and psychologically, depressed me, controlled me like a robot slave. It took away years from my life, decades and ruined them, was effectively a eugenics operation considering I am not economically capable or have the social capacity for loving relationships necessary for possibility of having a family. It violated my human and political rights. It made me think that even if I were to set aside the brain damage and limitations placed due to the program I cant trust working because an organized group will try to irritate me or harass me covertly and I may look crosseyed at someone or something and then get fired by HR or something acting like tyrants  and get mobbed out of a job, be driven crazy. Finally, it treated me and my life like a pawn to "expose a problem."

1.      Kinney, Robert L. “Obama-Biden Administration Legalized ‘neurological Surveillance’ after Trump’s Election.” LifeSite, May 8, 2023. https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/obama-biden-administration-legalized-neurological-surveillance-after-trumps-election/.

2.      Advocacy For Human Kind. “An Open Secret: The Growing Problem of Cyber Torture via Coordinated ...” The Office of The High Commissioner. Accessed July 2, 2023. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Torture/Call/NGOs/Advforhumankind1.pdf.

3.      Mcphate, Mike. “United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers.” The New York Times, June 10, 2016. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/health/gang-stalking-targeted-individuals.html.

4.      Jacobsen, Annie. Area 51: An uncensored history of america’s top secret military base. Pg xvi and xvii London: Orion, 2012.

5.      Bowcott, Owen. “Un Warns of Rise of ‘cybertorture’ to Bypass Physical Ban.” The Guardian, February 21, 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/feb/21/un-rapporteur-warns-of-rise-of-cybertorture-to-bypass-physical-ban.

6.      Wagner, Kurt. “Regina Dugan, the Head of Facebook’s Secretive Hardware Lab, Is Leaving the Company.” Vox, October 17, 2017. https://www.vox.com/2017/10/17/16488654/regina-dugan-facebook-hardware-lab-exit-building-8.

The Technology Schizophrenics Have Talked About for Over a Century

I was reminded while writing this book that voice hearing and schizophrenia stole my 20s and 30s from me and I don't think the government intends to repay me for this. On January 28, 2019, MIT Technology Review had a headline that stated “Laser’s Can Send Whispered Audio Messages Directly to One Person’s Ear.” This article reveals that there is technology right out in the open being discussed by MIT that can send voices into the heads of individuals at a distance. This to me is a great big revelation that the story passed down and heralded by Mental Health institutions about Schizophrenia, isn't addressing the truth of the matter and that perhaps this technology is in fact ancient and connected to UFO technology in which incidents of experiences with UFOs go back thousands of years.

In the book At Hell’s Gate, an autobiography of a man who was a soldier in Vietnam and is now a monk, the author, Claude Anshin Thomas, describes an incident in his training when he didn’t put his rifle where it was supposed to go and the sergeant, who was over half a foot taller than him, stood chest to his face and urinated on him. He then prevented Thomas from washing for multiple days. (1) The military, a government institution,  operates in secret with enormous technological advancement and openly describes weapons to produce voices in people’s heads as well as mind machine interface technology. People will read stories of despots all over the world and of corrupt societies and have no problem believing the atrocities, but if you say the U.S government and members of U.S society target their own people with weapons, which they readily admit exist, nobody can or is willing to believe it.

There’s a scene in the opening pages of a Star Wars book I read titled A New Dawn in which a character is having a conversation and says, “The empire better watch out.” In the following chapter, the book explains how, at the newest building on the planet Gorse, a corporation that is running surveillance for the Empire immediately analyzes the phrase and the speaker. A commander of the surveillance corporation pulls up a file on a guy and he is red stamped. They monitor his speech and then send him to the mental health unit. (2) This is a Disney and Lucas Films book. There’s a thing in our society of letting secrets out in science fiction, which I will touch on a little more later in this chapter. If you read science fiction you get informed. The real truth on Earth is that this happens with thoughts, and there is a massive, deployable citizen paramilitary that engages in psychological warfare and other hard attacks against “thought criminals.” Countless articles provide deliberate disinformation in that they obfuscate the reality that brain decoders eavesdropping on your thoughts have been achievable for a long time. This is being slowly revealed to make it seem like it’s new technology and that the programs utilizing it are in their infancy, but they are not.

While visiting Disneyland with my family, we went on the Star Wars ride “Rise of the Resistance.” My sister remarked that it seemed like fascism was being normalized with this ride. I could see her point. A normalization of fascism and introduction of corporate rule and authoritarianism are happening in our society, and it’s almost mundane when you point it out. I actually found the Disneyland ride to be more of a “Hey! Here it is: fascism, so prevalent that we made a ride in which you are hit over the head with it at an amusement park.”

However, we aren’t always hit over the head with the machinations of fascism. Sometimes it still conceals itself. For instance, there is an entire information stream designed in which major governmental organizations, NGOs, and press agencies all acknowledge archaic ways of spying. This archaic system is conducted to obfuscate the new high-tech weaponry and surveillance equipment that the former Los Angeles FBI Head, Ted Gunderson, alluded to in his 2011 testimony in support of a lawsuit brought forward by Keith Labella, which will be presented in chapter 3. As Targeted Individual and journalist Ramola D writes, “As long as mainstream media and ‘lawmakers’ who don't read bills but are comfortably ensconced in Congress focus purely on online communications and email/social media as targets of NSA spying, expect to be fed a continuous platter of lies. The real spying, real surveillance, and real electronic assault on Americans is far, far worse—all this is a cover for the radiation surveillance and neuro surveillance the NSA is engaged in.” (3)

In a Roots Action interview with NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake, the interviewer posed this question: “Is most deception from agencies like the NSA and CIA accomplished by telling the public things that aren’t true? Or by not telling the public things that are true?” Drake responded, “It is a mix of both. NSA and CIA are often at odds with each other—even rivals at times in certain areas—but hide much of what they do behind the blanket of secrecy and national security. Deception is a form of hiding the truth, while projecting a reality you want others to believe.” (4)

Author Annie Jacobsen discusses Allen Macy Dulles, son of former CIA director Allen Welsh Dulles, in her book Pentagon’s Brain. The younger Dulles suffered a traumatic brain injury during the Korean War and can only remember technology that existed previous to 1952. This is basically how people treat schizophrenia: they ignore technological developments in the public domain over the past one hundred years that would explain what schizophrenics describe happening to them. In her chapter titled “Brain Wars,” she discusses how the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) ostensibly is trying to find ways to deal with mental illness and traumatic brain injuries in soldiers. She states that typically, however, DARPA has other unstated objectives when they develop various technologies. (5) It struck me as an unstated implication or nudge for Jacobsen to include her description of Dulles as not remembering anything before 1952 technology while discussing mental illness in adjacent commentary in the chapter. It seemed like she was laying out the method or modus operandi for the system or psychiatry and society at large.

 For decades media has been promulgated to show people in skull caps or invasive surgery used to link their minds cybernetically to machines. In February 2023, CNBC ran an article discussing how Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos were funding a startup company called Synchron to the tune of 75 million dollars. (6) Synchron, the article states, will use a noninvasive method to read people’s minds for brain-computer interface or mind control computing that includes implanting people’s brains through blood vessels. The implantation method draws on “decades of existing endovascular techniques.” Lost in the article, however, is that there are people who have claimed that methods to read their mind have been enacted for decades as part of nonconsensual human experimentation. Many of these people believe they were implanted with technology such as nanodust, while others believe that there is technology to bypass implants. I will discuss in a later chapter a claim by an alleged whistleblower at Security Industry Specialists named Bryon Kofron that he has knowledge regarding DNA resonant frequency and Security Industry Specialist’s ability  [AO1] to remotely access an individual’s thoughts through matching brain frequency.

In his book Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari writes about the use of science to create brain scanners at airports in order to read people’s minds:

But science is not just about offensive weapons. It plays a major role in our defenses as well. Today many Americans believe that the solution to terrorism is technological rather than political. Just give millions more to the nanotechnology industry, they believe, and the United States could send bionic spy-flies into every Afghan cave, Yemenite redoubt and North African encampment. Once that’s done, Osama Bin Laden’s heirs will not be able to make a cup of coffee without a CIA spy-fly passing this vital information back to headquarters in Langley. Allocate millions more to brain research, and every airport could be equipped with ultra-sophisticated FMRI scanners that could immediately recognize angry or hateful thoughts in people’s brains. Will it work? Who knows[AO2] ? Is it wise to develop bionic flies and thought reading scanners? Not necessarily. Be that as it may, as you read these lines the US Department of Defense is transferring millions of dollars to nanotechnology and brain laboratories on work for these and other such ideas. (7[AO3] )

Part of projecting a reality that agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency[AO4]  want others to believe, as Thomas Drake stated in his interview with Roots Action, includes portraying scientific breakthroughs and their implementation in society as “science fiction.” They do this by putting these ideas, concepts, and technologies in fictional films like Starwars or Marvel movies and other mediums or artforms. A few years ago, for example, Scarlet Johansson starred in Ghost in the Shell, a movie about terrorists hacking into people’s minds and controlling them. . The film mirrors reality. Children’s shows also touch on this technology and social control system.  In one episode of the children’s show Doc Mcstuffins, all the toys were spying on a child playing with his toys. They were watching on a big monitor and then entered the child’s room to infiltrate the playtime. In yet another TV show, Burn Notice, there was a plot in 2011 about how the intelligence community features  people being placed in brain research experiments after having their rights compromised by FISA. This is the literal explanation that many people espouse is what happens to Targeted Individuals.

In addition to science fiction being used for entertainment or to hide technological implementation in society, I think that people utilize fiction genres to divulge classified secrets, so they aren’t prosecuted for giving away such secrets. If I’m not mistaken, the comic series Captain America started nearly a century ago during a time when the chief executive officer of Dupont Company was giving public speeches about super soldier chemical enhancement. In this case, there’s some public acknowledgment of a technology, but I believe that DC, Marvel, Star Wars, Lord of the Rings (with the elves’ mind invasions), and Avatar are just a few other examples of divulging classified secrets in a medium where people are protected. I think that its allowed because it functions as a way to communicate to different audiences. To those in the know it is like a wink; for those ignorant, it is a way to keep them believing it is fictional. It could also function as a way to inform people in the know or to muddy the waters for other audiences.

A third possibility is that it is an effort to inform the public. The book A.D. After Disclosure was written by longtime researchers and public informers on UFOs and false flags Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel[AO5] . The book provides a look at a “what if” scenario of the government disclosing that there is alien contact and that aliens interact with Earth. In a testimonial for the book that appears at the top of the cover page, none other than Stan Lee, creator of Avengers, Spiderman, and X-Men, states  that “Zabel and Dolan have brilliantly created a compelling blend of history and informed speculation that makes their exciting world seem like tomorrow’s news today. Don’t dare miss it!” (8) That Stan Lee is supporting a book on alien disclosure lends credence to this third possibility that technological breakthrough disclosure is an element of his comics and their movie renditions.

In addition to fictional movies hiding or possibly acting as vehicles of disclosure of scientific breakthrough implementation, there is also implementation that is overt or breakthroughs that are actually covered in the media. One breakthrough occurred in 2007 when there were ads in New York City that sent voices into people’s heads as they walked by on the street. (9) The technology used in these advertisements indicates that the voices Targeted Individuals describe receiving are external and part of a weapon system. This weapon was described as such on the U.S Army website a decade ago and can be viewed via a screenshot.

Witnessing dreams that are cartoons or that have music and photos in them is also indicative of brain invasive tech being weaponized or implemented, but people ignore such evidence. How does one explain a person like myself or my brain producing dreams with professional cartoons or music from classical to rock when I have no drawing or musical ability. This technology was documented on CNN in the 1980s. In a series of special reports in 1985, the network discussed the “woodpecker” machine in the Soviet Union and talked to a Dr. Bob Beck, who stated that humans are incredibly sensitive to electromagnetic weapons. In the segment the reporter describes images being sent to the brain or eyes of the subject of electromagnetic stimulation. The report also discussed how the Navy was working on radio frequency and research into mind control. (10)

Even though the CNN report from 1985 was shared nearly 40 years ago on a major network, it is not common knowledge or commonly discussed that weapons to produce voices in the heads of targeted persons are in use. Maybe this will change in the next 10-20 years: there are now Artificial Intelligence chatterbots (aka chatter boxes) linked up to an advanced neurophone satellite system that collects brain signatures for a mass database. This AI brain control and neurophone system can lock onto a target delivering voiced messages 24 hours a day in an attempt to drive the target insane. One group of scientists reporting abuse is the Mind Hacking Strategy Group. One scientist in this group is a Department of Defense and CIA whistleblower named Dr. Robert Duncan, who has written three books on the subject. (11)

The U.S. Army has acknowledged on multiple occasions that weapons exist that are used in the Targeted Individual program. On the U.S Army website they identified v2k as an acronym for “voice-to-skull” weapons that beam voices into the heads of the targeted person. (12) And in December 2017  U.S Army initiative, a blog called The Mad Scientist Labratory, submitted an entry titled “Battle of the Brain.” In it they described neuroweapons that “grant adversaries (and perhaps the [U.S.]) the ability to kill, disrupt, degrade, damage, and even ‘hack’ human brains to influence populations, bring about confusion and panic, and disrupt ... govt and society.” (13)

Questions of whether adversaries of the U.S military are using the technology to “hack human brains” as described by the military ignore whether the United States uses the technology or weapon and, if so, what infrastructure is used to deploy it. The late Dr. Paul Batcho, former DARPA senior[AO6]  scientist with high-level security clearance, stated in the following letter that cell towers are used for synthetic telepathy to attack Targeted Individuals.

I am a former scientist from Los Alamos National Lab in NM where I held a Q-Clearance for the DOE (top-secret DoD) for several years. I have also worked on DARPA research projects. I have a Ph.D. from Princeton and now live in St Petersburg and work … (Personal information deleted) …

I seem to have stumbled across an advanced technology that I would classify as synthetic telepathy. It clearly uses the cellular towers to transmit illegal signals. It sounds unbelievable but it is actual technology being used on civilians of the US.

My basic research does indicate that such technology can exist and dates back to the V2K (P300) mind wave technology of the 1970s. This does appear to be a much more advanced version that allows open communication of human mind to mind bridges.

Please forward my email to the appropriate DoD security office and I would like the issue investigated. Human brains appear to transmit and receive at the RF bands around 450MHz and microwave transmissions can be highly damaging in turns of induced bio-effects. Please also forward my email to any CIA or US technology team that may be researching similar technologies. It is very clear to me that such technologies exist.

Please feel free to contact me, and I will be able to offer some background and technical information.

Thank you

Paul F Batcho, Ph.D.

St Petersburg, FL 33701 (14)

In recent years, Congress has responded to instances of what is called Havana Syndrome with investigations on whether the brain damage experienced by numerous government personnel and diplomats was caused by weapons. However, this is not the first instance of members of Congress responding to or publicly acknowledging deployment of weapons to cause severe illness or damage. As I mention later in this book in discussing voting, as a member of Congress, Dennis Kucinich sponsored an unsuccessful bill in 2001 that identified space-based weaponry in order to outlaw it. “Psychotronic,” “electromagnetic,” and “sonic” weapons were all mentioned in the Space Preservation Act of 2001.

Frank Olson was a bioweapons scientist for the United States who worked in project MK Ultra before allegedly hurling himself out a tenth story hotel window. After it was discovered that the government administered LSD to Frank Olson days before his alleged fall, his son Eric Olson, later disputed the alleged suicide cause for Frank Olson’s death and sought investigation into the possible murder of his dad. In a lawsuit against the government, the family was awarded a settlement or an equivalent of 3.8 million dollars in today’s money. In Marshal Thomas’ Monarch The New Phoenix Program, the author states that “Frank Olson’s murder demonstrates how development of mind control is intertwined with biological, chemical weapons development, radiation testing and building of Manchurian Candidates.” Thomas goes on to say that MK Ultra Sub Project 119 was foundational to all “non-leathal” weapons development. He cites a memo which describes controlling human beings and according to Thomas, in conjunction with other evidence the memo demonstrates “significant interest in Radio Frequency (RF) weapons and direct control of human behavior at a distance.”

The movement in the United States to try to pass laws addressing some of these weapons based in space in the 2001 Kucinich act was preceded by European Parliament sessions in 1999 that called for international ban on human manipulation. In these sessions there were demonstrations of crude devices that could transmit sound electronically to the brain, bypassing the ear and sound waves. The Scientific and Technological Options Assessment, part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament, published a report that year on crowd control technologies. In 2000, they published their final report. Some of the report includes chemical and biological weapons and a  portion of the report discusses radio frequency weapons that manipulate human beings. The report cites acoustic, laser, electromagnetic frequency, electrical disabling, and paralyzing weapons. The report also cited “non-lethal” weapons that were emerging out of the national military and nuclear laboratories in the United States. These weapons were part of the Clinton Administrations “non-lethal” warfare doctrine. The report questions the dubious nature of the term “non-lethal.” The authors state that the weapons could be considered lethal sometimes or pre-lethal. The report cites the U.S.’s most controversial weapons as “Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior in a variety of unusual ways.” The report also states that much of the development of 2nd generation crowd control weapons are “shrouded in secrecy.” Perhaps in reference to the DNA Resonant Frequency technology decades later alleged to be used by Security Industry Specialists in Bryon Kofron’s alleged knowledge of what he calls Total Individual Control Technology, the EU Report cites:

“neuroscience modelling of receptor sites in the human brain coupled with knew knowledge of the human genetic code(emerging with the Human Genome Project and The Human Diversity Project), is already opening a path for malign use of the biological sciences for targeted human control. Whilst the research is still embryonic, there is risk of behavior modification, race specific crowd control weapons and area denial technologies emerging with profound implications which need to be further assessed in both current capabilities and what the results of the projects might mean in terms of state of the art, which is rapidly changing.”

There is little doubt that these programs using radio frequency or directed energy weapons are “shrouded in secrecy.” But as time goes on the secrecy finds itself exposed in newspaper reports that often discuss how government personnel have been affected. On December 5, 2017, the Washington Post ran a story about National Security Agency Counterintelligence Officer Mike Beck. Beck believes his Parkinson’s disease was caused by microwave weapons. (16) In recent years the news media has run many stories about Havana Syndrome, and the government has responded with investigations and committees receiving expert testimony that the syndrome is likely caused by a weapon. In August 2022, Newsy ran a story in which journalist Mark Zaid suggested that 10-12 FBI agents coming forward in Miami and DC claiming they were experiencing Havana Syndrome are the tip of iceberg for domestic incidents of what the National Academy of Sciences says is likely electromagnetic pulse weapon attack. (17) A few months earlier, a New York Times journalist stated on CNN that other diplomats and government personnel experiencing these attacks complained of voices in their head. (18) Yet CNN didn’t ask any follow-up questions about whether hearing voices in other instances, like with people diagnosed with schizophrenia, is also possibly externally induced. This is a bit like learning that Jolyn West worked as a psychiatrist for the CIA and was part of MK Ultra, but then not questioning the notion of a conspiracy between CIA and psychiatric diagnosis of Jack Ruby that I referenced earlier.

 For over a century, people diagnosed with schizophrenia have described hearing voices. An excerpt from the Washington Post is probably one of the most significant pieces of evidence that the story of a genetic cause for voice hearing and “schizophrenia” is often a complete lie. The U.S. Air Force admits that it has technological weaponry that transmits words and phrases into a person’s head:

An academic paper written for the Air Force in the mid-1990s mentions the idea of a weapon that would use sound waves to send words into a person’s head. “The signal can be a ‘message from God’ that can warn the enemy of impending doom, or encourage the enemy to surrender.” In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone’s head. … The patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab, where scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects. (19[AO7] )

I stated earlier that there is an almost cultural production aspect to leaked information about gangstalking or the Targeted Individual program. The Air Force’s revelation through an academic paper is perhaps in line with this. Another Air Force pilot, John Robb, outlined the scope of a system designed to target people with gangstalking, which he describes as “Open Source War.” John Robb was an Airforce pilot who graduated from Yale. He went to work for Special Operations Command. On his blog Global Guerillas he states that he spent a year working for the U.S Joint Chiefs of Staff. In 2007, he was heralded as “Best and Brightest” by Esquire Magazine. He also wrote the book Brave New War.

I also found the following on a blog about John Robb:

Robb created a blog called Global Guerillas and by 2010 was posting some very unusual things. One post in particular suggests that groups should single out individuals for harassment. He suggests the whole operation could be framed as a “coercive game” where points are accumulated for acts of disruption or harassment. The rest I’ll quote directly from his blog post ... (link listed further down):

Robb’s words ...

In short, learn everything about the target down to bank account numbers. This then enables the movement to target the individual and their family with: *Stalking and harassment. In the street, at a restaurant, or at school. *Identity theft. From financial to professional. Publication of private information. *Denial of communication. Flood phones, e-mail accounts, voice-mail, etc.

In short, any online group of sufficient size could launch an effort like this. However, to really zoom the effort and turn it into a coercive tool, one modification should be made. It should operate as an online game. Here’s a potential template:

*Experience points for accumulating information. Pics snapped with a cell phone camera. Points for financial account information. Etc. Experience points translate into basic improvements in status which improves the weight of a contributor's vote (on the next target, the quests to open, etc.). *Quests. Equivalent to counting coup on a tribal enemy. Draining the target’s bank account. Gaining control of a voicemail system. Tagging the target with paint. Disabling the target’s car. Quest achievement translates into special recognition (emblems, new tools, positions of leadership, etc.). *Competition. Contests between individuals or groups to complete a given task within an alloted time period. As in first to ... . (21)

Whatever John Robb was describing on his blog Global Guerillas takes place around the world, according to tens of thousands of Targeted Individuals’ testimonies. Gathering evidence for Security Services Stalking is very difficult. It is designed to not be noticed to the untrained eye. Recently, however, more evidence of an online footprint has presented itself. Like Robb’s musing, a German website published instructions on how to play a game called “pay stalking”:

In addition to these coercive type games, reminiscent of the tactics Targeted Individuals describe, is the ability to control people remotely via electric stimulation of the brain or some other sort of brain stimulation. The Department of Defense official science blog stated in a post that the technology to control the brain remotely is powerful, or in other words active. The blog states that “every single aspect of human sensation, perception, emotion, and behavior is regulated by brain activity. Thus, having the ability to stimulate brain function is a powerful technology.” (22)

 The technology to control the brain remotely, which the Department of Defense implies is active, has perhaps been so since at least the 1980s. On the Targeted Justice website is a quote from Dr. Eldon Byrd, who ran the Marine Corps Nonlethal Electromagnetic Weapons project from 1980 to 1983. Byrd was told that were his weapons to work, they would be classified. According to him, they did work and went black. In 2001 Byrd stated the following:

 Is Mind Control Possible? Absolutely. There is a mountain of evidence. ... Today we know there are technologies that can induce sound into the brain at a distance, can monitor and alter brainwaves at a distance, can alter behavior at a distance, can induce images into the brain at a distance, can target individual organs at a distance. Can disrupt the calcium ions binding on individual cell surfaces at a distance, creating pain and other effects anywhere in the body. Mind control technology exists, without a question. (23)

Today, these technologies used in classified weapons programs have begun to go commercial. On May 29, 2014, CNN ran an article about a bone conduction technology that produces voices in the heads of targets. The headline read, “Bone conduction: Get used to the voices in your head.” The article revealed that the technique to bypass ears and electronically send sound or visual images is real, but it makes it seem like it’s in infant stages. CNN referenced a commercial product called Shokz, formerly known as Aftershokz headphones. (24) More recent and more technologically advanced than Shokz is Noveto’s sound-beaming technology, selling commercially, to beam sound into an individual’s head without headphones. The Times of Israel announced the release of a desktop device that beams sound through ultrasonic waves tracking the ear of the listener. (25) What TIs and government whistleblowers say is that governments have a remote satellite system that they utilize to communicate to people. Some people are selected for harassment or hostile communication by it. I find the “get used to it” headline by CNN to be hostile, but I am sharing that CNN admits the technology exists.

For decades the manipulative retort to anyone subject to covert uses of technology, like remote neural monitoring, mind reading, and sounds in their head, that are is now increasingly released in commercial form has been: How could anyone read your mind? What technique do they use? On November 24, 2019, CBS and the University of Pittsburgh admitted, Oh yeah, MRIs do that. On the program 60 Minutes, CBS showed that MRI machines can decode thoughts. Lesley Stahl states, “Advances in neuroscience have shown that, on a physical level, our thoughts are actually a vast network of neurons firing all across our brains. So if that brain activity could be identified and analyzed, could our thoughts be decoded?” She later  notes that “ten years ago, 60 Minutes met a team of scientists at Carnegie Mellon University who had begun to decode simple thoughts inside the brain. Now they’ve moved on to identifying complex thoughts from spirituality to suicide.” (26)

Since this revelation that MRIs can decode thoughts, a second retort to those subject to covert uses of technology like remote neural monitoring, mind reading, and sounds in their head has also been that the process to read minds is messy and slow and can’t be done in real time. But in May 2023 the Guardian published an article describing how researchers at the University of Texas at Austin had in fact used Artificial Intelligence, similar to that used in Open AI’s ChatGPT, to read people’s minds in real time and turn their thoughts into continuous text: “An AI-based decoder that can translate brain activity into a continuous stream of text has been developed, in a breakthrough that allows a person’s thoughts to be read non-invasively for the first time.” (27)

Dr. James Giordano, a professor at Georgetown University and West Point, has been giving lectures on the weaponization of this technology. In a lecture titled “The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” Giordano describes how people in the military will undoubtedly encounter this technology during their life and career. He states that “it's not a question of if nonstate actors will use some form of neuroscientific techniques or technologies, but when, and which ones they’ll use.” (28)

MRIs have been around since the early 1970s, but the effort to read minds and control humans electronically has been cited to be an objective of scientists informing the CIA as early as 1959. An article from the Institute of Science in Society states the following:

In 1959, Saul B. Sells, a professor of social psychology at a minor US university, submitted a proposal to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to build for them the most sophisticated electroencephalography machine that would have an integral computational capacity to analyze and, hopefully, make sense of the brain waves it recorded. In other words, the professor proposed to make a machine that could tell the CIA what a person was thinking, whether or not the person wished to disclose that information.

The CIA approved the project in 1960, adding some library research with five objectives. The fifth objective of the research was, “Techniques for Activating the Human Organism by Remote Electronic Means.” The entire assignment was thereafter known as MKULTRA subproject 119, MKULTRA being the CIA’s notorious mind control programme. It was based on the erroneous notion that the Soviets already possessed the means to control minds and the US had to catch up as rapidly as possible. (29)

In December 2021 the U.S. government attempted to rewrite this history a bit by acting like China had entered new ground in developing and weaponizing “brain-control weapons.” The Biden Administration sanctioned 30 Chinese companies for helping China's military apply these weapons. (30) There was no mention of MKUltra or the objective established by the United States in 1960 to develop the same ability. We are talking about over 60 years of development in this area from the United States. And if one takes into account victim and researcher Robert Naeslund’s lecture, the transcript of which is submitted in a later chapter, it amounts to 80 years or more.

 In sanctioning these 30 Chinese companies for developing or dealing with a brain-control weapon, the Biden administration is giving an acknowledgment by the highest office in America that brain control is a deployable technology. In Annie Jacobsen’s book The Pentagon's Brain, she discusses many different areas of merging biology and machine. One term that DARPA used was biohybrid. Jacobsen discusses a successful experiment in which a scientist at DARPA steered a lab rat using electrical stimulation, as part of an effort to create biohybrids that can help in search and rescue missions as well as other applications. In Marvel’s Black Widow movie, starring Scarlett Johansson, Soviet assassins and super soldiers are dealt with through mind control and in one scene it touches on biohybrids when a pig is being controlled remotely in the family home. Once again, this implementation of the technology, hidden in a comic book movie, references an adversary’s development of remote brain control. Jacobsen’s research demonstrates that DARPA was developing this technology in real life for the U.S. government. As a reminder, in chapter 1 I mentioned how Regina Dugan, a former scientist for DARPA, went to work at Facebook in an effort to commercialize mind-reading phones. So we have the application of mind reading and brain control being developed by DARPA, meaning that it is real, and tens of thousands of people describing being subject to an organization using that technology often being diagnosed with schizophrenia.

Notes

1. Claude Anshin Thomas, At Hell’s Gate: A Soldier’s Journey from War to Peace (Boston: Shambhala Publications, 2006).

2. John Jackson Miller, A New Dawn (New York: Del Rey, 2015).

3.  D, Ramola. “The Everyday Concerned Citizen.” The EveryDay Concerned Citizen. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://everydayconcerned.net/.

4. Roots Action and Thomas Drake, “Roots Action Education Fund Interview with Thomas Drake,” Act.rootsaction.org, accessed November 22, 2022, https://act.rootsaction.org/o/6503/t/0/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=210219.

5. Annie Jacobsen, The Pentagon’s Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America’s Top Secret Military Research Agency (New York: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown, 2016).

6.  Ashley Capoot, “Brain Implant Startup Backed by Bezos and Gates Is Testing Mind-Controlled Computing on Humans,” CNBC, February 18, 2023, https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/18/synchron-backed-by-bezos-and-gates-tests-brain-computer-interface.html.

7. Yuval N. Harari, Sapiens, pg 262,(Paris: Albin Michel, 2020).

8. Richard M. Dolan and Bryce Zabel, A.D., After Disclosure: When the Government Finally Reveals the Truth about Alien Contact (Pompton Plains, NJ: New Page Books, 2012).

9.  Alex Mindlin, “For Your Ears Only,” New York Times, December 9, 2007, https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/nyregion/thecity/09ligh.html.

10. AlanWattResistance. “[2 Of 2] Electromagnetic Frequency Weapons - CNN, 1985,” YouTube, May 11, 2011,

.

11. Robert Duncan, Project: Soul Catcher (Boise, ID: Higher Order Thinkers Publishing, 2010).

12.  Sharon Weinberger, “Army Yanks ‘Voice-to-Skull Devices’ Site,” Wired, May 9, 2008, https://www.wired.com/2008/05/army-removes-pa/.

13. User, “15. Battle of the Brain,” Mad Scientist Laboratory, December 28, 2017, https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/15-battle-of-the-brain/.

14. “Dr Paul Batcho, PhD,” Richard Lighthouse, accessed November 26, 2022, https://www.rlighthouse.com/dr-paul-batcho-phd.html.

15. Omega Foundation, “Crowd Control Technologies: Final Study,” European Parliament Directorate General for Research, accessed November 26, 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/stoa/2000/168394/DG-4-STOA_ET(2000)168394_EN(PAR02).pdf.

16.  Ian Shapira, “Was a Spy's Parkinson’s Disease Caused by a Secret Microwave Weapon Attack?,” Washington Post, December 5, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/was-a-spys-parkinsons-disease-caused-by-a-secret-microwave-weapon-attack/2017/11/26/d5d530e0-c3f5-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html.

17.  Sasha Ingber, “Exclusive: FBI Agents in the U.S. Report Symptoms of Mystery Syndrome,” Newsy, August 26, 2022, https://www.newsy.com/stories/fbi-agents-in-the-u-s-report-symptoms-of-mystery-syndrome/.

18. May Kasahara, “CNN Journalist Admits That US Diplomats Were Hit with V2K Acoustic Torture Attacks in Cuba!,” YouTube, April 11, 2022,

.

19.  Sharon Weinberger, “Mind Games New on the Internet: A Community of People Who Believe the Government Is Beaming Voices into Their Minds. They May Be Crazy, but the Pentagon Has Pursued a Weapon That Can Do Just That,” Washington Post, January 14, 2007, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/magazine/2007/01/14/mind-games-span-classbankheadnew-on-the-internet-a-community-of-people-who-believe-the-government-is-beaming-voices-into-their-minds-they-may-be-crazy-but-the-pentagon-has-pursued-a-weapon-that-can-do-just-that-span/a0d09db6-d7aa-4fcd-a829-2a3ebc56df9d/.

20.  John Robb, “Coercive Games,” Global Guerrillas, accessed December 1, 2022, https://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/2010/06/coercive-games.html.

21. Admin, “Operating the Brain by Remote Control,” DPL, October 9, 2022, https://dpl-surveillance-equipment.com/health-related/operating-brain-remote-control/.

22. Eldon Byrd, “Dr Eldon Byrd,” TARGETED JUSTICE, n.d., accessed December 2, 2022, https://www.targetedjustice.com/dr-eldon-byrd.html.

23.  K. Monks, “Bone Conduction: Get Used to the Voices in Your Head,” CNN Business, May 29, 2014, https://www.cnn.com/2014/05/29/tech/innovation/bone-conduction-get-used.

24.  L. Dixon, “Futuristic Device from Israeli Firm Puts Music in Your Head, without Headphones,” Times of Israel, November 13, 2020, https://www.timesofisrael.com/futuristic-device-from-israeli-firm-puts-music-in-your-head-without-headphones/.

25.  L. Stahl, “Scientists Are Using MRI Scans to Reveal the Physical Makeup of Our Thoughts and Feelings,” CBS News, September 6, 2020, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/functional-magnetic-resonance-imaging-computer-analysis-read-thoughts-60-minutes-2020-09-06/.

26.  Hannah Devlin, “AI Makes Non-Invasive Mind-Reading Possible by Turning Thoughts into Text,” Guardian, May 1, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/01/ai-makes-non-invasive-mind-reading-possible-by-turning-thoughts-into-text.

27. Modern War Institute, “Dr. James Giordano: The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” YouTube, October 29, 2018,

.

28. Bio-electromagnetic Weapons, Science in Society Archive, n.d., accessed December 7, 2022, https://www.i-sis.org.uk/BW.php.

29.   A. Macias, “U.S. Blacklists 34 Chinese Entities, Citing Human Rights Abuses and ‘Brain-Control Weaponry,”CNBC, December 17, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/16/us-blacklists-34-chinese-entities-over-human-rights-abuses-brain-control-weapons.htmlChapter

 [AO1]Does Kofron claim he has this ability, or that SIS (or some other entity) has the ability? Need to clarify here.

 [AO2]I assume there should be a period following this statement, so I've added it. OK?

 [AO3]For direct quotes from a source, you should add the page number for the quote to your note (here and elsewhere).

 [AO4]You should spell these terms out if you haven't used them before in your book--once you've used them, you can just use the acronynms if you'd like.

 [AO5]Is Dolan the researcher and Zabel the informer? If so, I'd change this to "...by longtime researher Richard Dolan and public informer on UFOs and false flags Bryce Zabel." If both are researchers and informers, it's OK as written, but it should be "...longtime researchers and public informers"

 [AO6]The source you cite lists him as senior scientist, not chief scientist

 [AO7]I double-checked the quote with the source you cite in the note and made the corrections you see here based on that comparison. It's important that you double-check every quote to make sure that you are quoting it accurately before you submit this to a publisher for consideration.

Chapter 3

Political Surveillance, Human Rights and Censorship.

 A Targeted Individual has been defined by the organization, Targeted Justice, as : “someone that has been selected by the Deep State (usually FBI, DHS, or CIA) to unwillingly participate in an experimental government torture program.”(1) I am just one person in Plato's allegorical Cave. I have no security clearance with the government or powerful corporation. There are tens of thousands of people coalescing or discussing online and identifying themselves as “Targeted Individuals.” They mostly all complain of Directed Energy Weapons attacks, biological hacking attacks, mind reading and voice to skull or synthetic telepathy which has been termed “remote neural monitoring.” They also all describe an activity called “gangstalking,” in which organizations conduct in-home and in community surveillance and stalk and harass the target 24 hrs a day. There is a real repression and warfare system in use today using brain control, mind reading, directed energy weapons and voice to skull also known as synthetic telepathy, which goes largely unreported in the press because they are all engaging in the repression and warfare. So they don't report on their own covert war they wage. It is my contention or experience that Artificial Intelligence is involved with controlling this system. This has been stated by many Targets elsewhere as well.

Have you ever heard of the knockout game? It is a game where people pick out a person and try to knock them out using one punch. Gangstalking is like the knockout game, except it is a game in which one person is picked out and instead of one punch being thrown, they are subject to an endless barrage of physical and psychological abuse. It is a perfected tactic at least centuries in the making with the bite of new high-tech weapons. I came across a book online from 1723 that I can no longer locate. It was written by a priest in a secret society who wrote that people opposed to their society should be "harassed until they start murmuring to themselves and then let them be dismissed as being pernicious to others." While attempting to write this book, the United Nations began to go public to some small degree on this tactic. The UN came out with a report in March of 2020 by Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer. The UN report said that governments around the world are psychologically torturing their citizens with "cybertorture" and "cybertechnologies," in conditions comparable to "physical custody." (2) All this came out amidst the Corona Virus pandemic, so it got no airtime or people were "distracted."

Nilz Melzer has described, basically, a theme of this book, which I used in the title, that there is a game of parameters or parameters of debate that are allowed in our society. In his book The Trial of Julian Assange, Nils Melzer, states

 "Freedom of expression is guaranteed so long as we discuss only what is served up to us in the headlines. When we stray into subject areas declared off-limits, our dissent becomes a 'conspiracy theory' & our thirst for knowledge criminal 'espionage.'"

(32) Nils Melzer on the torture of Julian Assange: A compendium (substack.com) in book pg 209 supposedly I bought book.

Governments around the world are passing laws and setting up systems to hide this torturing of people. The U.S. Government, for instance, is fighting a war against its own citizens and selling it as either a war against Russia, A War on Terror and now a War Against White Supremacy and Domestic Extremists, which is why government officials kept talking about foreign and domestic enemies during the Trump impeachment saga. In October of 2019, Hillary Clinton accused Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard of being a Russian traitor. Gabbard's offense was that she disagreed with Clinton's foreign policy and Russians liked that. So, by that standard, the band Guns and Roses are also a bunch of Russian traitors because they oppose civil wars and Russians go to their concerts. Hillary was basically insinuating that anybody who disagrees with her foreign policy is a Russian Traitor. It is this type of insinuation by government officials and citizens in the United States, which gets used for the FISA secret court proceedings, justifying surveillance of individuals and groups of people. This surveillance justification is used to engage in what is referred to as 'human experimentation,' but is really a well-oiled repression and oppression system around the world, utilizing security services gangstalking, which includes street theatre psychological drama skits, remote neural monitoring or mind reading, directed energy weapons and voice to skull technology.

In their book A.D. After Disclosure Authors Bryce Zabel and Richard Dolan cite how denial and ridicule operations were used for decades around the world to dismiss anybody who had knowledge of or who had witnessed UFOs. The authors go on to say how denial and ridicule is very effective. In the book Monarch The New Phoenix Program author Marshal Thomas discusses how the Soviet Union adopted a modern technique of institutionalizing dissidents in mental institutions and diagnosing them with mental disorders while using electromagnetic weapons to pacify them. The author goes on to discuss a 1972 US Army paper that was written as part of a study of this tactic for its implementation against “traitors” or “domestic enemies” in the United States. Thomas contends that this type of program started in the US to target those who opposed the Vietnam war. Opposition to the war was seen by military brass as a treacherous act by the public which cost America the war. Marshal Thomas goes on to discuss how the attitudes of this brass is identical to Hitler and nazi ideation about German betrayal by communists and Jews in World War 1. Thomas also lays out how there was already, through the Military Intelligence Division, coordination and implementation with Vigilante groups such as the American Protective League and then later the Mafia to keep an eye on suspicious activity. This mirrors to some degree nazi development in Germany. Thomas contends how usage of these vigilante groups and criminal cooperation demonstrate how an organized crime can develop and maintain secrecy. In other words, we have a system in place in which authorities with criminal nazi ideation wage war, psychological and physical, then accuse people who are sane with being of schizophrenic ideation as we witness the operation or are victims of it. What A.D. After Disclosure describes as “intellectual bullies” then deny and ridicule anybody describing this system.

 Hillary Clinton referring to anti-war candidate, Tulsi Gabbard, as a traitor is evidence of what is called the Monarch Program: or The New Phoenix Program,  as stated and identified by researcher and writer Marshal Thomas. (3) The system, that he calls Monarch, polices political speech and retaliates against people exercising first amendment rights or against people reporting crimes to journalists or the police. The government then engages in bizarre psychological warfare, so that when the subjects of the oppression and repression speak about what is happening to them, they are discredited. Many 'Schizophrenics' are telling the truth. Schizophrenia is a front 'disease,' masking criminal operations by the FBI, Department of Defense, Homeland security, National Security Agency and Central Intelligence Agency. This is what victims describe as 'experiments,' and occult abuse and torment of individuals. The operators subjecting the 'schizophrenic' to torment or torture are desensitized. For some, this is possibly because of harsher tactics in other cases, which makes dehumanization or outright atrocity miniscule when held up to even more horrific acts. The Human Rights organization, Targeted Justice, states:

“This program was developed under the CIA's MK-Ultra project and is designed to break down the individual and "neutralize the person," using psychological, physical, and emotional stress.  The ultimate goal of this program is to control the entire population, through intimidation, fear, and threats.  Political activists, Labor Union leaders, Scientists, and Whistleblowers are some of the main targets of the program.  However, some people are randomly chosen.   Family and spousal relationships are usually destroyed, as part of this psychological torture.” (4)

 Many of the human rights victims or targets end up "living on the streets." And while some manage to survive there, it’s important to note that we are always talking about how we let people "live on the streets," but really, we leave people to die on the streets. The average age of death is in the 40s for homeless persons. (5) I sometimes think that people will look back on this era and think of people sleeping in the streets as barbaric that society functioned that way, but if there is no major education about it, I don't know if I am right about that. Michelle Alexander makes the point in her book, The New Jim Crow, that "critical consciousness is necessary for social action." (6) With regards to all the crimes of gang-stalking and directed energy weapons, I don't think there is a critical consciousness about it. There is just awareness.

In her book 1996, renowned author, Gloria Naylor created a novel dissecting how she was targeted for heavy invasive surveillance. The novel attempted to build off George Orwell’s 1984 and attempted to humanize or give insight to a citizen’s run-in with the national security state. The book bore witness to the experience of a subject of mass surveillance abuses, happening in the 1990s. (7) But the actual year 1996 was by no means the origins of this modern secretive takedown system.

According to sworn testimony by former high ranking FBI Official Ted Gunderson, who was head of the FBI in Los Angeles, this National Security Agency linked system has been around since at least the 1950s and became intensified after telecommunications tech became more sophisticated in the 1980s. In fact, 1984 is identified by Targeted Justice as the date for the deployment of the Satellite Directed Energy Weapon system called "Thunderbolt System" and the actual weapon has been identified as the Vircator.  In an email to members, Targeted Justice stated the following:

"The satellite weapon is called a Vircator. US Patent 4345220 is owned by the USAF. The production weapons are called the "Thunderbolt System" rated at 32 MegaJoules of energy, and built by the Titan Corporation (now L3Harris). They were launched into orbit beginning in 1984 and the entire satellite constellation of 24 weapons was fully operational by 1992. The weapons produce a microwave scalar beam that can easily penetrate buildings, metal, wood, & concrete. The system was originally designed to destroy incoming ballistic missiles as part of President Reagan's Star Wars program (SDIO). It is a military weapon system, that is routinely used against civilians, in violation of the Geneva Conventions."

While Gunderson states that high technology was introduced in the 1980s as well, he states that gangstalking went on longer than that by the U.S Government. This is Ted Gunderson's Sworn Testimony from a 2011 lawsuit brought by Keith Labella. In the Testimony, Gunderson states that gangstalking is real and has been going on for at least 60 years by a "rogue" state operator. :

 ted_gunderson_affidavit.pdf (targetedjustice.com)

TED L. GUNDERSON & ASSOCIATES

623 0-A Wilshire Blvd, Suite 6

Los Angeles, California 90048

Phone: (337) 344-8876

I, Ted L. Gunderson, hereby swear under the pains and penalties of

jury that the following statements are true and correct:

1. My name is Ted L. Gunderson. I am the owner and operator of Ted

L. Gunderson & Associates, an international security and

consulting firm based out of Santa Monica, California. I am

currently a licensed private investigator in the state of California. I

have performed private investigation and security work for

numerous individuals, companies, and governments worldwide

since founding my firm in 1979. I have worked for, amongst

others, F. Lee Bailey, Esq., The California Narcotics Authority by

appointment of Governor Jerry Brown, The 1984 Los Angeles

Olympic Committee, and The 1979 Pan American Games in San

Juan, Puerto Rico by appointment of then U.S. Attorney General

Griffin Bell.

2. Previous to my work as a private investigator I spent nearly three

decades in the F.B.I. Between 1951 and 1960 I was an F.B.I

Special Agent. In 1960 I was promoted as a supervisor at F.B.I.

Headquarters in Washington, D.C., where I was in charge of

Organized Crime and Racketeering investigations covering 26

F.B.I Field Offices nationwide. Following the assassination of

President John F. Kennedy, I was re-assigned to Special Inquiry

White House Matters at F.B.I. Headquarters, In 1965 I was

promoted again to Assistant Special Agent-In-Charge of Internal

Security and Anti-Terrorism of the F.B.I. New Haven, Connecticut

Field Office. In 1970 I was promoted to Assistant Special Agent-

In- Charge of the F.B.I. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Field Office.

On July 12, 1972 I successfully negotiated with two terrorist

hijackers of National Airlines Flight 496 for the release of 119

passengers at Philadelphia International Airport. In 1973 I was

promoted to Chief Inspector at F.B.I. Headquarters. I also served

as Special Agent-In-Charge of the F.B.I. Memphis and Dallas

Field Offices. I retired from the F.B.I as Senior Special Agent-In-

Charge of the Los Angeles Field Office of the F.B.I. with over 700

employees and a budget of over 22 million dollars in 1979.

3. I have read the Complaint in the current action of Mr. Keith

Labella against F.B.I. and D.O.J. It is my professional opinion,

based on information, knowledge and belief that the information

sought by Mr. Labella in this F.O.I.A. suit regarding “gang

stalking”, “gang stalking groups” and “gang stalking methods”

reasonably describes an ongoing, active, covert nationwide

program that is in effect today, and, based on my investigations

and experience, has been operational since at least the early

1980’s. Since the 1980’s gang stalking has increased in scope,

intensity and sophistication by adapting to new communications

and surveillance technology. These programs are using the

codenames Echelon Program, Carnivore System, and Tempest

Systems. The Echelon Program is administered by the N.S.A. out

of Fort Meade, Maryland, and monitors all email and phone calls

in the world. Carnivore System is administered by the N.S.A. out

of Fort Meade, Maryland, and can download any computer system

without being traced or otherwise known to the owner. Tempest

Systems can decipher what is on any computer screen up to a

quarter of a mile away. These programs are negatively impacting

thousands of Americans and severely abusing their civil rights on a

daily basis.

4. Based on my investigative work, which includes intelligence from

sources such as active and former members of the Intelligence

Services (including the F.B.I., the C.I.A., the N.S.A. and Military

Intelligence), information from informants active in criminal

enterprises, and, victim testimonies, I have come to the conclusion

that thousands of victims have been targeted by an illegal

government rogue criminal enterprise that is active 24 hours a day

within the U.S. This conspiracy is far too active to be controlled or

operated by private enterprise whose goals are achieving financial

gain. These operations require extensive financing with no return

on the investment. This program’s operations are financed by

illegal black operations, i.e., narcotics, prostitution, child

kidnapping (children sell at covert auctions for up to $50,000 per

child), human trafficking, gambling and other rackets,

5. I have documentation and know that throughout the U.S., operating

24 hours-a-day and 7 day s-a- week, there is a Central Command,

located within the U.S., with multiple satellite offices, whose

administrators can instantly initiate surveillance, phone taps and

harassment against any individual in the country. They have the

technology, financing and manpower to dispense illegal

surveillance and harassment against anyone at any time, day or

night, I have files on numerous cases of active, programmatic,

illegal government harassment currently being conducted against

thousands of Americans. This makes the F.B.I.’s former

COINTELPRO program, which I worked on, including in a

supervisory capacity, look like a Sunday school program by

comparison.

6. I firmly believe that most individuals working in the F.B.I., other

intelligence agencies, and the government overall are honest, law-

abiding public servants. However, a sophisticated network of rogue

operatives has secretly infiltrated the F.B.I., other intelligence

agencies including the C.I.A., and other key government positions.

This rogue element seeks personal power and wealth and considers

themselves above the law and the Constitution. They are carrying

out the aforementioned surveillance and harassment activities in

conjunction with organized crime, the cult movement in America

including Satanic cults, other commercial and political interests,

and even misguided civic organizations and neighborhood groups.

This illegal surveillance and harassment program is being called

gang stalking and organized stalking by the victims targeted by it.

The victims are targeted for a variety of reasons including

government and corporate whistleblowers, parties to financial and

employment disputes, parties to marital disputes (usually divorced

women), and even jilted paramours. Journalists covering

controversial issues, and, even attorneys and private investigators

representing unpopular clients or interests, have been targeted by

this program.

7. Individuals targeted by this program have been subjected to illegal

and unconstitutional phone taps, illegal re-routing of business and

private phone calls for purposes of harassment; illegal audio

“bugging”, surreptitious entry into home, office, and vehicle,

visual surveillance in the home conducted by illegal placement of

miniature remote, wireless cameras (often accessible via internet),

illegal internet spyware, illegal GPS tracking (often through their

own mobile phones), regular fixed and mobile surveillance, mail

misdirection, mail theft and tampering, financial and employment

sabotage, slander campaigns and community ostracizing , internet

disinformation and smear campaigns, poisoning, assaults and

murder, illegal set-ups on drug charges and other felony charges,

amongst many other civil rights abuses.

8. In addition to high-ranking members of the F.B.I., other

intelligence services, and the government overall, wealthy,

powerful members of criminal syndicates, multi-millionaires and

the corporate elite are using the government gang stalking program

to harass enemies. They can get a targeted individual harassed for

the rest of that individual's life (individual cases of gang stalking

lasting for over a decade are common). The higher status members

of the gang stalking conspiracy initiate the gang stalking and

coordinate logistics and funding. Lower echelon government rogue

operatives, lower ranking members of the military (in violation of

Posse Comitatus), petty criminals and street thugs perform the

actual grunt work of daily monitoring and harassment of

individuals targeted by the program.

9. Based on my professional experience, extensive intelligence

information and belief, it is my professional opinion that the F.B.I.

is involved in and has investigative files on the subject of gang

stalking, related gang stalking methods, and gang stalking groups

in the F.B.I.'s vast intelligence files, that are responsive to Mr.

Labella’s F.O.I.A. Complaint. Furthermore, I have personally

referred numerous victims of gang stalking to the appropriate

agents at the F.B.I. for investigation of their cases. I have also

furnished the F.B.I. with documentation of an active, international

child kidnapping ring probably operated by rogue C.I.A. agents.

The F.B.I. has ignored my requests to investigate even though it is

their responsibility to investigate kidnappings. I have a contact in

Germany who advises me that the C.I. A. has set up secret

operations on U,S. military bases for the kidnapping, sale and

trafficking of children worldwide. The F.B.I. may be using a

unique codename and nomenclature for the gang stalking

phenomenon in its records, However, this is a semantic difference,

and, in no way changes my professional opinion that the F.B.I. has

investigative files on the nationwide phenomenon of gang stalking

described in reasonable and specific detail in Mr. Labella’s

F.O.I. A. Complaint. These F.B.I. files contain information

responsive to Mr. Labella's F.O.I.A., Complaint regarding the

subject of gang stalking. The F.B.I. and other intelligence agencies

are administering and covering up the rogue, covert, government

criminal enterprise of gang stalking. The gang stalking

phenomenon appears in the records of both the F.B.I. and the

N.S.A. in their records pertaining to the Echelon Program,

Carnivore System, and Tempest Systems. In addition, tire gang

stalking phenomenon appears in the records of both the F.B.I. and

the N.S.A. in their records pertaining to information collected by

Narus systems. Narus is a wholly owned subsidiary of defense

contractor Boeing that produces sophisticated, mass surveillance

computer systems currently being used by both the F.B.I. and the

N.S.A.

Dated this day of 2011.

Los Angeles, California

Ted L. Gunderson

(8)

https://archive.org/stream/CorruptionSatanicDrugCultNetworkAndMissingCHildrenVol.14623/Ted-Gunderson-Affidavit-on-Gang-Stalking-4-26-11-7_djvu.txt

Political Surveillance Expanding

As with any official statement by former Surveillance personnel, I hold some skepticism about the fact that Gunderson asserts this system is a ‘rogue system.’ However, I fully acknowledge that Ted Gunderson was swearing under oath that he believed it was. So, with skepticism, I acknowledge that this is one of the most detailed public acknowledgements before a court of law about the gangstalking program. According to Marshal Thomas the Intelligence Agencies utilize closed loop cult organizations such as Scientology, The Moonies and Free Masons as some examples to hide much of what they do in the ways of Mind Control experimentation which overlaps with what I believe Gunderson describes in his testimony above. It is important to focus on the fact that Gunderson asserts that the FBI has knowledge of the gangstalking program and that they keep records of it though possibly under different terminology. Though this system is not new, the gov't has been codifying and bending rules to make themselves less accountable to the constitution, absent a winning lawsuit challenge and oversight. A recent excerpt from a report titled Still Spying on Dissent by Chip Gibbons of Defending Rights and Dissent, an organization calling for Congressional Investigation into surveillance abuses, found that:

“While the FBI has always been engaged in First Amendment abuses, the current Attorney General’s Guidelines, created in 2008, facilitate these abuses. Under these guidelines, the FBI is allowed to conduct investigations called “assessments” of U.S. persons without factual predicate of criminal conduct or a threat to national security. The guidelines also allow FBI agents to use race, ethnicity, religion, or First Amendment-protected speech as a factor to open an investigation, or to attend public meetings without disclosing their identities.”(9)

In the book Battle For Your Brain, Nita A. Farahany discusses how in 2020 NATO declared that they were developing ways to circumvent laws that could potentially prevent Cognitive warfare. NATO stated cognitive warfare was a new frontier. UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer, a short time after this, conducted a UN investigation and determined governments around the world were psychologically torturing people. Melzer, according to Farahany, cites mind control experiments as examples of psychological torture. Farahany asserts cognitive warfare that seeks to obliterate identities, personalities and mental functioning should fit the definition of psychological torture. It's not just the danger of the government policing free speech through surveillance abuse like the FBI's political surveillance that is a serious threat to our lives in the long age of Human Rights Crimes by the government. Now, the government and prominent voices are threatening to require private social media companies to basically eliminate free speech on their platforms. The Green Party's Ajamu Baraka described an interview on Democracy Now in which Roger McNamee, a venture capitalist and musician whom some estimate to be worth a billion dollars, argued for broad speech restriction requirements of these companies. Ajamu Baraka stated:

Democracy Now gave an hour to Roger McNamee who's essential message was that private capitalist companies should be required to not only check and; monitor paid political ads but the distribution of information that might be "false," "disinformation or "conspiratorial." That's freedom?

On May 5th 2022, a court case, Missouri v. Biden was filed. The lead non governmental plaintiff, Jim Hoft, writes in the Gateway Pundit that:

"The complaint alleged that the U.S government was not only threatening and coercing social media companies to censor Americans on social media, but they were also working WITH social media companies to accomplish that goal." (10)

In July of 2023 the United States House of Representatives held government hearings on the weaponization of government to censor political speech. Presidential Candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr. was in attendance to speak on the matter of censorship. The language of the hearing referred to big tech as out of control along with government agencies who were out of control in their efforts to silence speech. For his part, Kennedy was asked about his taped conversation days earlier in which he cited a National Institute of Health study which found that certain races of people were more affected by Covid 19 than other races. Kennedy alluded to the fact that race based bioweapons have been developed around the world and in China and the United States. Kennedy in his taped conversation stated that the NIH study found that Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese were least affected while Black and Caucasian people were most affected. The statement was made with clear implications or kind of floated out for people to just run with it how they wanted to, with many people concluding that Jewish people and Chinese were responsible. I began in chapter 1 discussing how when there is duplicity and manipulation you should ask how deep does the duplicity and manipulation go? The back and forth between Kennedy Jr and the congresspersons danced around the issue with Kennedy Jr denying the implications of his statement and that he ever said such a thing. In my estimation he was telling a half truth, but because he denied ever saying the things he said, he killed conversation about the topic in the media and thus in society.

Dirty politics by world power intelligence agencies is usually manipulative and duplicitous, so if in fact Covid 19 is a bio weapon that targets certain races while affecting other races less, it remains a possibility that it is done to frame certain people a certain way. In fact, the possibility of it being a race based bioweapon would lend to unlimited possibilities with regards to motive. I think it's good that a presidential candidate was talking about bioweapons and I'm not necessarily against acknowledging race based weapons. In fact, right around the time RFK Jr was appearing before the House Sub Committee on censorship and weaponization of the government I had shared in my blog a "crowd control" technology report in a European Union Report from 2000. The report discussed the ongoing developments with race based DNA weapons that included viral or biological. Of course, officials in the George W. Bush Administration stated decades ago that these types of weapons would be a politically useful tool in a "New American Century" which I don't think should be lost in all of this.  However, I am a bit curious as to how RFK Jr seems to being positioned and how there is involvement with the highest paid actor in American government, Dr. Anthony Fauci, that seemingly frames, supposedly, anyhow, Jewish people and Chinese people. That there is involvement of the American government's highest paid players rises to suspicious framing and intelligence structures having a hand. As with anything, I'm reminded of the symbolic technique of rule that I see in the bible as a control heavens or celestial, control rebellion lower world with a fallout aristocrat. You never know what is going on. And in my own experience I know that the government will do false flags and even joint operations that have an appearance of one thing but serve another. Also Dr. Fauci, China and Jewish play could play the antagonist to the rising "truth teller" RFK Jr. In fact, it could be a false flag or a framing altogether with little involvement by those groups. Or members of those groups could be involved for purposes of framing all of China and Chinese communist party and excuse war on "marxistss" or marxist thought here in America or strictly to make Kennedy palatable.

Of course, there is also the possibility that marxists were at the helm and motivated, but I personally think that Dr. Fauci is anti big government and played the White Coat mockery of government so I suspect due to his involvement that there is duplicity which I would suspect with American involvement. I personally experience this with Targeted Individual program in which I'm their "truth teller" whom they manipulate and try to manage my perception. Because of all this I have a hard time getting involved with RFK Jr., even though I generally agree with his thought processes or find them palatable. But I potentially see links to Nazi operation even though I acknowledge that he could just be a traditional liberal trying to bring sanity to a situation and is also being mindcontrolled and managed perceptually by the huge system that abounds us all. It's too muddled at this point for me to be gungho.

To conclude this writing on Kennedy’s statement on covid possibly being a race based bioweapon and congressional appearance, politics in this country is a dirty game. RFK Jr. is a politician. Politicians manipulate. I am a bit suspicious that there is a possible Biowar with U.S government and Fauci involvement and money went from working class and small businesses to a few rich people by trillions and now it is being said that communists and Jews were responsible. I'm reminded that Vladimir Lenin was funded by Wallstreet and that the Reichstag fire has been determined to be a false flag in which Hitler did the deed and blamed Jews and Communists as he blamed World War 1 on these groups and martialed Germans as an aggrieved populace bent on genocide and world domination, at least as far as historians can or will tell. What's never been acknowledged officially in this country by history is that 9/11 was a false flag in which Arabs were blamed in a cave, but which appears obvious that Government involvement took place ushering in fascism. In fact, the exact scenario of the World Trade Center being hit by hijacked airplanes was conducted in an anti-terror drill in 1982 by the United States government, yet senior Whitehouse officials in the Bush Administration at the time of the strike used the phrase “unimaginable” to describe the day’s events. This to me is evidence of duplicity and manipulation, to which I remind it should be asked, once such a thing has been demonstrated, what is the depth of it all? I personally find Dr. Anthony Fauci to be duplicitous and I think he played almost a caricature of government overreach and authoritarianism as a whitecoat literally injecting everybody.

If Covid 19 is in fact a race based bioweapon as Presidential Candidate RFK Jr. surmises, it just seems like the government was willing to release a race based virus and or targeted individuals with Artificial Intelligence controlled virus in order to capitalize on it politically and had a many headed Hydra placed in response to do so, of which Kennedy Jr. could be a head. I don't really know what is going on with covid 19 and rfk jr., but I do know the whole government is dirty across the board and perhaps we are in World War III. World War II was very dirty. Dirty deeds were done to win that war, so I guess people feel comfortable doing so in WWIII. I know no matter the stakes, I am not for releasing a virus and killing a bunch of civilians.

Due to my experience in society, I suspect RFK Jr could be controlled and have a system propping him up or managing him as part of a multiheaded hydra. And so he doesn't acknowledge if this is happening, so it makes me think he's not telling the whole truth and this makes me think that he could be like the Mysterio character in Spiderman and that the virus is computer controlled. I hope he's not. I may vote for him hoping he's not Mysterio. Of course, I am preconditioned growing up with knowledge of history and the way this country has operated under false flags and manipulation in war since its founding. The American Revolutionaries dressed up like native Americans to throw out tea because they didn't want to pay a tax. This behavior continued all the way through 9/11. The United States propped up Hitler and then presented themselves as world saviors in defeating him, at least in appearance, so that’s the general history we are dealing with here.

The way my mind works is that some politically motivated organization tied into American and Chinese government used a bioweapon virus to manipulate the world for some purpose. So I use the Italian phrase qui bono? Who benefits? Conceivably it would follow that this organization is very sophisticated and would factor in implications of studies done to pinpoint which races were affected and which weren’t. So seems obvious that they would factor in or calculate eventual backlash from this knowledge becoming public and that there would be conclusions drawn by society and that there would be some form of accountability. When war planners draw up war plans, I know that they factor in the conclusions to be drawn by various populations and that they plan for phases. Now some additional conjecture on my part, since that’s all that is being done by people without mind reading technology, is that it so happens that killing old and sick people aligns with nazi ideology and accountability for Jews and communists would lead to their benefit as well. Additionally, money exited from small businesses and working class and went to a few rich people and corporations.

I view 9/11 in a very similar manner. That a sophisticated government group left clues behind to implicate the government. I believe the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie is also the same tactic. I think they maybe were creating cultural production to create doubt about WWII and the vilification of Nazi Germany. This potentially includes creating doubt about Pearl Harbor. I also think they used public knowledge of Soviet spymasters and such in homeland security and lies about 9/11 that would eventually become public knowledge as intelligence tests and to sow doubt in American institutions, as well as sow doubt in opposition to dictators, perhaps even using Iraq as a parallel to Nazi Germany, as a way to turn Germany into a victim, which I of course know packaged history admits on some level with Post World War 1 politics and treaties. I don’t know how Kennedy factors into all this, perhaps it is commentary on reason or science vs superstition and Kennedy is the shadow government head that went underground after the JFK assassination. And now there is a resurgence of shadow govt taking over and striking against the JFK assassination coup govt. Covid 19 and 9/11 and MK Ultra Subproject 119 numbers are related and I think this is designed.

This type of hypothesis or conjecture or thought process can be met now with censorship. Biden administration pressured Amazon to censure books that questioned COVID-19 vaccines - Washington Times

 Part 2 Censorship of  Psychological Operations

 The dangers of deciding what is disinformation to eliminate the designated disinformation speech seems obvious to me. Take hypothesis out of science and we are stuck in the dark ages. The dangers of eliminating speech is particularly true when we have a secretive brain control takedown system being censored out of the News. It is worth noting here that the Mainstream Media or the 5 major corporations that operate most of network television and newspapers, lie every day by covering psychological operations that are scripted events. Anything that challenges their narrative is considered a lie. One example of this was when a group of Iraqis staged a car bombing and then faked being the victims. It was all caught on tape with people laying down and faking being injured, running into the video frame after a controlled car bombing took place. It all leaked out on youtube and was shown on a United Kingdom news site called the Daily Star (11) https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/iraq-baghdad-staged-fake-car-17055385

It is acts like these that were alluded to when in April of 2020, MSNBC ran scenes from the movie Wag the Dog and said "look just how easy that would be" to start something that had the "appearance of a war" or a fake war as Robert DeNiro’s character does in the movie. For sharing this information and questioning the underlying theme and motive of NBC’s assertion, I could have my speech eliminated by new systems of control discussed by Roger McNamee and that former Green Party vice presidential nominee Ajamu Baraka characterized as questionable freedom and that were discussed in the 2023 congressional hearing on Censorship.

 These are parameters being put in place on acceptable questions that are allowed to be asked even as government institutions’ own declarations beg these questions from curious citizens. In the classic book 1984, the organization that controls society, Big Brother, conducts wars around the world that are staged for the purposes of controlling the home population and those in their empire. The staging of events of war have been acknowledged by the Pentagon as at least partially making up reality in today’s world. Shortly after beginning this book, The Russian Invasion of Ukraine began. A few days prior to the initiation of the invasion, the head spokesperson for the Defense Department, John Kirby, stated that the U.S had intelligence that the Russian armed forces were planning on carrying out a false flag operation complete with fake explosions, fake victims, fake mourners and even fake corpses. (12) This is the first high profile public acknowledgement I'm aware of by the Pentagon that governments utilize false flags and in this case the U.S government was stating that it was going to be a massive event that was fake with fake explosions, corpses, victims, and mourners. So now that the war has broken out, I ask if one single event can be conducted in this manner, is it possible for multiple countries to conduct a series of events that in sequence have what MSNBC described as "an appearence of a war?" Or what is known as a Psychological Operation. In this case, a very expensive one or lucrative one for some.

To ask this question could be met with censorship or the questionable freedom identified by former Green Party vice president Ajamu Baraka. The Green Party is a global movement which gangstalkers, Donald Trump and FBI, have staged subterfuge anti foreign information "crimes" to undermine. Trump reeks of conspiracy with counterintelligence program to make it palatable or even popular. The age of Trump is or was a bizarre age of total blackout in the media regarding anything unrelated to Trump. While there was some semblance of renewed attention to a few issues for brief moments like immigration, the whole Trump presidency functioned as a psychological operation, undermining Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, which establishes the right to share information across boundaries. The Trump Tower meeting, which was the original basis for the impeachment saga was likely staged to undermine free speech amongst internationalists and to champion FISA and surveillance. If you are part of a global political party, like say the Green Party, is it illegal to share polling data with operatives of a foreign government? These are the potential effects of going after Trump and Paul Manafort on election interference. Chip Gibbons summarizes how this has turned the issue of FBI surveillance abuse of the first amendment upside down in his aforementioned report:

“Finally, in the last two years, this discussion has been overshadowed by extremely partisan discussions about investigations into Donald Trump and his associates. While Trump and his supporters claim he is the victim of the greatest witch hunt in history, those concerned with potential abuses of power praise the FBI as a neutral, professional crime- fighting force. Constituencies on the left who traditionally have been skeptical of the FBI as a threat to civil liberties now find themselves as the Bureau’s defenders. Constituencies on the right who have advocated expansive police authority to maintain order, thwart subversion, and counter terrorism now find themselves speaking of the FBI’s potential to be a political police.”3(13)

Steve Schmidt, a former Deputy Assistant to President George W. Bush, in discussing Trump's impeachment over the Ukraine phone call on MSNBC stated: "If you can't speak your mind without fear of being investigated then you don't live in a free country." This is precisely the point of anti-Russia-Gaters and people discussing the 'political surveillance' of the FBI. The worry over being subjected to a political police is well founded in my experience and independent information being shared on social media is a target for those in power. In discussing the 'poison' found on social media, House Leader Nancy Pelosi seemed to indicate while speaking about Russian interference in the election, that unless you are voting, you are unamerican as Journalist Michael Tracy summarized on social media:

Pelosi warns that the "poisoning" of social media is undermining "the mindset of what is America," which is "optimistic and entrepreneurial." So if social media makes you pessimistic, you are the victim of "interference" rather than a critical thinker (14)

 Now once one analyses Trump as part of a counterintelligence operation where a staged insurrection at the capitol in which police admittedly, as reported, coordinated with many protestors who “didn’t vote,” as was plastered widely across media, you can see an effort to police or engage in an age-old trick of setting up illegal action in order to police political activity.

 To return to the effort to police social media and speech, I submit the phenomena of criminal activity or sensational social media trends and viral marketing over the past few years on tic toc. My take on these abusive tic toc challenges and psycho behavior based on social media is that kids are dupes and are being used to debase a platform that functions as an antidote to "rich people news" or corporate news that dominates the narrative surrounding our society. Social media provides a platform for marginalized or powerless poor people to influence narrative and spread information. Just like the way the FBI or police will use pink haired undercover officers to disrupt and commit violence at a protest or political meeting, so too are there armies of people conducting that type of operation to debase political organizing on the internet and in society. I believe it is all part of a greater Operation Gladio type operation to create a strategy of tension so that people will ask for more authoritarian governance and is against democracy prevailing.

1.   “Targeted Individuals - about Us.” TARGETED JUSTICE. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://www.targetedjustice.com/what-is-a-targeted-individual.html.

2. United Nations Human Rights Council 43rd Session. Report of The Special Rapporteur on Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. NY, New York. March 2020.  A/HRC/43/49 (un.org) A/HRC/43/49 (un.org)

3. Thomas, Marshall G. Monarch: The New Phoenix Program. New York: iUniverse, 2007.

4. “Targeted Individuals - about Us.” TARGETED JUSTICE. Accessed July 16, 2023. https://www.targetedjustice.com/what-is-a-targeted-individual.html.

5. “Homelessness Makes You Sick.” Health Care for the Homeless - Baltimore and Maryland, January 22, 2020. https://www.hchmd.org/homelessness-makes-you-sick.

6. Alexander, Michelle. Essay.  In The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colourblindness. Pg 15. UK: Penguin Books, 2019.

7. Naylor, Gloria. 1996. Chicago, Illinois: Third World Press, 2007.

8. Gunderson, Ted L.. "Ted Gunderson Affidavit" T

9. Gibbons, Chip. “Still Spying on Dissent.” Defending Rights & Dissent, March 24, 2020. https://www.rightsanddissent.org/fbi-spying/.

10.  Hoft, Jim. “Missouri v. Biden Lawsuit Discovery: Biden Regime Designates Your Thoughts as Part of Government Infrastructure - They Call It ‘Cognitive Infrastructure’ and They Believe It Is Their Right to Control It: The Gateway Pundit: By Jim Hoft.” The Gateway Pundit, May 25, 2023. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/biden-regime-designates-your-thoughts-as-part-government/?fbclid=IwAR2aP5SV2NkwPCfMDTGUDRXF1mjGzrypQ0GtoYqO34H0xmHNb3hGczaz9IM.

11. Connolly, Paul. “Does This Video Show the Moment Iraqis Stage a Car Bomb Terrorist Attack?” Dailystar.co.uk, November 2, 2016. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/iraq-baghdad-staged-fake-car-17055385.

12. Borger, Julian, Shaun Walker, and Dan Sabbaugh. “Russia Plans ‘very Graphic’ Fake Video as Pretext for Ukraine Invasion, US Claims.” The Guardian, February 3, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/03/ukraine-russia-fake-attack-video-us-claims.

13. Chip Gibbons. Still Spying on Dissent: The Enduring Problem of FBI First Amendment Abuse (Washington D.C: Defending Rights and Dissent, 2019) Still Spying on Dissent.pdf - Google Drive .

14. Tracey, Michael. “Pelosi Warns That the ‘Poisoning’ of Social Media Is Undermining ‘the Mindset of What Is America," Which Is ‘Optimistic and Entrepreneurial." so If Social Media Makes You Pessimistic, You Are the Victim of ‘Interference’ Rather than a Critical Thinker Https://T.co/sqc38imzrz.” Twitter. Twitter, October 26, 2019.

https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1188139449303076866.

Chapter 4

Voting and Narrative of Democracy. America as Dictatorship with Trump and Anti-Trump Branding

As a subject of a massive conspiracy against my rights, that seemingly cuts across political divides, I more or less gave up on politics. This is possibly part of the Technofascist Re-Education Camp’s goal to make me a brainwashed cog. I have a general sense and know my feelings or beliefs on a variety of things, but I basically know my little corner of knowledge and life's experience and my brain's reaction to politics. I don’t go down paths of inquiry about various things like fentanyl or covid. I have thoughts on it, but I don’t do what I feel is an intelligence test research thing for something that is partially or what I believe is a psychological operation. I find both camps to be annoying, but I think that is by design in order to undermine two party democracy in America while there is no hope for a 3rd or 4th party and such.

Even though both camps are annoying, I don’t think I can ignore the fact that there are seemingly divides in politics among the masses. Historically there have been traditional calls to merge the left right divide or create a “third way” that is tied into Nazism. The call to say the left-right paradigm is false may apply to Democrat vs Republican, but not to the reality that there is a group of people that largely fall into the following left right paradigm. What neither really adheres to is ethical behavior. 

It’s generally accepted with the revelations of the assassinated journalist, Gary Webb, in The San Jose Mercury News that Nicaraguan Drug Cartels were ok’d to sell drugs in black communities in the U.S and that Nixon and the CIA used drugs to diminish politically the black community, decimate their neighborhoods and antiwar community through Drug War, law and order campaigns in a coordinated system of takedown and control. So why don’t we look at violence in a similar mafia-esque tactic in which leftwing violence excused war from the right and pushed people right and was used as an excuse to break people politically. It has the markings of the same system.

 Basically we are turning people into a bunch of little pol pots. I personally think this is done to ultimately push world politics to the right. If you look at the 20th century, that’s what happened. Extreme leftwing violence around world had the effect of pushing people right into todays kleptomaniac police state fascist prison planet. Capitalism in its current formation is certainly killing the earth and I see that Socialism were it to be bought into by all of society could work. However, this buy in is not feasible in the real world. In any event, I believe that we need to move toward cooperative less competitive or non competitive system and we need to talk about it and brain storm and organize toward that as a society. Capitalism may have some positive qualities, but it’s negatives are destructive. Due to the powerful interests, the high stakes involved and the general belief in it by plethora of people it would take World War III to move away from it right now which could be planetary destruction or enormous social and human costs and I fear that people are willing to go that route. So some hybrid or compromise is what I am for at this point. This is partially why I am for social democracy as a middle ground solution.

Essentially there are definitely people on the right that are ok with the market economy controlling or being the final arbiter in social affairs and damned be the environment or status of ecological systems. The right generally wants to conserve the system and are ok with rich people controlling society and rewarding competing hard workers and talented people while letting impoverished and "lazy untalented losers" fight for scraps or live in poverty without any sort of change to the greater system. This, often, is linked to a belief in a divine nature of fascism or capitalism, but sometimes is based on Social Darwinism and a belief in a natural order. There is also like a secondary cultural identity of loving domineering violent males and war making and hating gay sex or any non- biblical condoned people. Historically, this was previously the space for imperial racism and an identity around that, which is still a legacy that lives on to some degree. 

This is seriously what drives a lot of people.

There are also people who identify as left that want other factors to regulate market economy like common good, environmental health and sustainability, or human rights. They generally want to make changes to the system, see it as fallible and are not ok with rich people controlling society. Many on the left don't want the masses to compete for resources, but want them to unite and are not ok with poverty. Generally, the left wants to eliminate poverty and wants the earth to survive. The left generally wants some changes to the system. Some want to dismantle it and replace it with left wing systems. There are people who identify as left that don't agree with war as the default state of humans and don't see capitalism or fascism as the natural order or believe in it as natural order. The left generally more favorably supports feminism and female elevation to roles of political, economic and social power. There are people who identify as left that want to rectify injustices of imperialism, ableism and racism and support diversity. 

The trick is recognizing that there is in fact this divide and in supporting democracy as a compromise between them, then finding compromises between them as each makes its case. Unfortunately, it seems like some organizations, perhaps even the CIA like to capitalize on problems in society and instead of creating solutions, they stoke protracted conflicts keeping everybody divided further than where they naturally fall along these lines.

In earlier chapters, I talked of discussions in the political discourse of this country identifying a political police and in this chapter I have intimated that I personally experience a type of conspiracy which seemingly cuts across political divides. This possible monolith is operating our system with gangstalking. I will say that voter intimidation is a crime committed via gangstalking and I have been harassed to vote for Democrats, particularly Hillary Clinton. Now I’ll state that as a Target I don't advise anyone what to do with regards to voting. There are a few people in elected office that do acknowledge this system, at least in part. One body that did so was the Richmond City Council in California, and their Mayor, Tom Butt, made up of mostly progressives. Also, Democrat Dennis Kucinich who acknowledged mind control space weaponry in a bill he sponsored decades ago did so but has backtracked since and said nothing else about it. And as far as I know, the only other person in elected congressional office to acknowledge the program, at least in part, is former Republican representative Jim Guest who openly acknowledged the program while representing Missouri. Additionally, there is a target named Scott in California who has written to numerous government officials and received a letter from a City Council person in Los Angeles. The council member stated that they believed that Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti was considering starting a Task Force into the topics Scott had discussed in his letter, which included Directed Energy Weapons and Remote Neural Monitoring. (1) I imagine that it'd be hard to ignore Los Angeles City Council like Richmond has been, though sworn testimony from the former Los Angeles FBI head, Ted Gunderson, is ignored. During a press conference he gave as President, Bill Clinton said that human experimentation was wrong, and that the government had a moral responsibility to tell the truth about it or about anything that is wrong. I didn't know, however, if I could expect that belief system to rule another Clinton Whitehouse. I didn't have a hopeful attitude or know if one was detrimental or not. I don't know if cynicism is detrimental or not. I know that it is impossible not to be cynical.


I don't know who is best to vote for as Targeted Individuals or for what you individually believe. I did not vote in 2012 after becoming aware of this program. I voted straight Democrat in 2018, but don't like that when a Democrat abuses human rights or commits war crimes they are considered a Moderate and when a Republican does it they are considered a Fascist and I believe that this leads to a widely supported and condoned fascism that kills people and abuses human rights. I'll divulge that in the next vote for the 2020 presidential election, I voted Democrat. In the previous election, the 2016 election, I voted for the Green Party, but they also don't divulge any information regarding this tyrannical system. In the 2016 election, I was weary of war or casting a vote for war and someone said that Arab blood was very cheap to Hillary Clinton. I'd add that it was very cheap in that election overall from all the candidates in 2016.  I think that is true and that it eroded Democratic party support. However, on the war and peace front, Trump's behavior with North Korea in which he threatened Fire and Fury was alarming and I think bizarre. In the 2016 primary I voted for Bernie Sanders, but Sanders is mute on psychotronic weaponry or Directed Energy Weapons, and I don't know what a vote for Sanders would mean with regards to the Monarch Program. I suspect his heart attack during the 2020 primary was possibly induced. A week before his heart attack he released a plan to eliminate billionaires and a billionaire made the statement that maybe Bernie Sanders "shouldn't exist." (2) However, he seems to be in favor of 'homeland security' and 'national security.' The European Parliament called for a ban on 'human manipulation' weapons. I know that Europe is considered on the left. I also know that Kucinich called for a ban of psychotronic, and mind control weaponry and he is on the left. Serious laws are already being violated also. 

Jesse Ventura considered running for president. I've also read he endorsed Bernie Sanders for the 2016 Democratic party nomination. Jesse Ventura is the only politician besides Dennis Kucinich to talk about neurophone voice transmission technology. He demonstrated its existence on his television program. I personally think that Ventura knows more than he lets on about satellite neurophone technology, remote neural monitoring or mind reading and gangstalking, but at least he admits it exists. I would ‘ve been tempted to support a Ventura presidency, at least there would be acknowledgement of the neurophone, but I don't know what else would happen. 

There was a lot of anxiety over President Trump for good reasons and I think the Presidency is just weird no matter who is President. We vote for people we don't know to have such immense power over us and others. At Donald Trump’s inauguration, he stated that "freedoms must be reclaimed by each generation" as if a priestly class dolls them out. For years there have been impeachment petitions being circulated for President Trump and there are issues I think he should be impeached for just like Obama and Bush, but the impeachment petitions for a long while were based on ultra nationalist anti information sharing, which is a Human Right. Most of the early campaigning for Trump's impeachment was about sharing information in Trump Tower obtained from Russian sources. Nancy Pelosi confirmed that the motive for Impeachment was based on Russian collusion, which for months was itself based on declarations that “crimes” were committed due to information sharing. She stated it was central to the Ukraine Phone call article of impeachment, stating “all roads lead to Putin.” (3) If Americans were caught overseas or abroad sharing information to influence elections and then were gone after with full force of a foreign country's government, they'd be considered political prisoners. I was uncomfortable setting a precedent for impeaching somebody for sharing information obtained by a foreign 'agent.' If someone from Vanuatu, for example, had damaging information about Trump and his corruption relating to global warming policies, I'd be for that information being shared. So, I don't see how I can be for it in that case and impeach someone because it came from Russia in another. 

This seemingly perpetual contradiction and hypocrisy presents itself to us as political subjects of the Two-Party system regularly. What I believe is that the persons in leadership positions are trying to undermine the two-party system with a hypocrisy churning machine. The pattern of behavior and news stories or events is unmistakable. So, then you'd think they'd offer a third party? No, there's no third party to be offered. In fact, they make it such high stakes with dueling oppressions that people become tribal during election season, which in and of itself undermines the two-party system further.  I view this hypocrisy churning machine on both sides to be a psychological operation to undermine democracy in America. If we are undermining the two-party system but not starting a 3rd, then what we’re really doing is undermining any semblance of democracy in America and what’s likely to replace it is fascist technocracy. This is the operation before us. Fascist Technocracy is taking over our society.

For the 2024 election I've seen Robert F Kennedy Jr. make mention of this fascist technocracy and he discussed an AI controlled Surveillance Tyranny being developed on CNN, but he did not go into detail and alas, you know, there is a depth to talk about this type of thing that doesn't get breeched in presidential politics. (4) He also tweeted out a Truthout Article about MK Ultra documents surfacing regarding CIA targeting indigenous and minority children, so either hinting at more to come in the way of exposure, but I don’t know.  I have noticed when you come across online accounts, figures or personal interactions in society, where people often discuss voting for RFK Jr. as having no effect on fascism, that these same people will usually make no mention of an Artificial Intelligence run surveillance dictatorship being developed, but in fact Kennedy Jr. has at least mentioned it. I find that interesting. As of this writing I'm going to vote Kennedy Jr in 2024, but don't agree with everything he stands for. I've come to view presidential politics as a compromise while maintaining some semblance of values. But I typically don't have much hope in the thing. I try to be supportive of my candidate without being tribalistic.

Nobody wants to hear this but trump took a page out from Comedy Central book. Comedy Central got us to collectively laugh at atrocity. Trump is introducing fascism through comedic medium getting us to laugh at atrocious things. America is a dictatorship and Donald Trump is in a secret society convoluting the dictatorship. He took the country down reality show psyops. I began this book discussing the intelligence tactic of using an antagonist in order to run an operation to gain trust in individuals. The same thing can be done to create trust in institutions or organizations as well. Trump functioned as an antagonist, in this case to prop up the media and intelligence agencies and institutions. In February of 2018, Republican Devin Nunes hinted at the “surveillance abuses” Targeted Individuals go through with a memo titled Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The Nunes memo release told a small secret, that the govt and presidents target people with 'surveillance' due to political beliefs or speech. 

The Nunes FISA abuse Memo called attention to the machinations of a political police.  The Trump reality show psyop to make counterintelligence program palatable and convolute a dictatorship does so by masking it in Trump and Anti Trump ppropaganda. This is done as part of a multifaceted psychological war that targets me in bizarre psychological warfare deliberate in its incredulity and bizarre nature to make me discredited and appear crazy when I share it.

We're supposed to see Donald Trump as a huge scam artist running Ponzi schemes and such, but then take everything he does and says at face value and all the people who positioned him along the way of his rise to fame and household standing, like NBC Universal we are also supposed to remove from any part of the scam and take everything they say at face value. How does that make sense? Trump is subverting media criticism in society by being a heel or buffoon authoritarian that attacks the media. They can position themselves off Trump as a people's champion when they are not. 

Donald Trump is staged like 9/11 was staged. Follow this: Trump is worth 4 billion dollars, Pelosi is worth 130 million. They are fighting an impeachment battle over exposing corruption and both support war in middle east, 1 in Syria and 1 in Iran, but 500,000 Americans must bake and freeze to death on the streets meanwhile. I stated earlier that once a person is targeted, they are subject to a bizarre and crazy psychological warfare designed to make them appear crazy so as to discredit them once they talk openly about it. Part of the bizarre psychological warfare used on me, so that I discuss it and discredit myself, is using Donald Trump to mimic me. On the news the day I decided to compile this book, for instance, was the headline that President Donald Trump tweeted that his impending impeachment was comparable to a lynching. There was much outrage regarding Trump's tweet, much the same as always. This is a formula for producing propaganda. I will discuss later how Donald Trump is a gangstalker who gaslights and mimics broken thoughts that I have in often distorted fashion. He is supposed to be my alter ego, one of many that act out on the entertainment and political stage to run media feedback and mind control operations directed at me and others. Trump's lynching remarks are intended to mimic a statement that I made a few years ago, in which I stated that the human rights abuses that Targeted Individuals go through with the community or workplace mobbing, Directed Energy Weapons torture, mutilation and sexual assaults etc. are comparable to lynching and have roots in lynching. I said, specifically, that they are a historical cousin to lynching. I stand by that statement. One would just have to look at the pictures of Targeted Individual and human rights victim, Midge Mathis' torture, as one example to understand that, though much of the torture can take place without leaving discernable marks. (5)

Robert Naeslund Lecture:  

21st Century Lynching uses high tech methods to destroy a person's mind and body coupled with 24-7 Mass Mobbing -For those unaware, it is an often-invisible crime happening in plain sight that people ignore.  Cybernetics is an entire transdisciplinary field of study devoted to the science of electronic control systems and communication systems in animals and machines. Ultimately, it is devoted to communication between animals and machines. It has been in existence for at least 3 quarters of a century and its development coincides with Pentagon programs to control populations post World War II. Organizations and programs engaging in the usage of mental slavery, mind control, brain invasive technologies and behavior modification programs on individuals established themselves in at least the late 1940s and included the influx of NAZI scientists into the United States. One known program often pointed to is Project Paperclip, however the knowledge about this program should not be equated with the extent to which mind control programs and brain invasive technologies are in usage. Dr. Robert Duncan has testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee about the usage of mind control programs enacted on targeted individuals and about the torture of citizens occurring on a mass scale. He states that these programs exist in the U.S with a scale of secrecy greater than the Manhattan Project, while the technology is commonly known in Eastern Bloc countries as bio-communication technology. There are some who are taken slaves by this system and others who are singled out for lynchings where they are tortured until they violently act out against police and are killed, made to commit suicide or are murdered with directed energy weapons often after physical and psychological torture.

In 2011, Robert Naeslund gave a lecture outlining the chronology of public acknowledgements in Newspapers and by scientists or politicians of what the New York Times at one point described as a future of “Push Button People.” The Lecture was titled “The Brain Project," which is what Naeslund referred to as the implanting of people to link their brains to a supercomputer.  I leave here his transcription. As someone with strong interest in this topic, I find this lecture to not be very prominent in disseminated information about what Marshal Thomas coins The Monarch Program. I don't know what to make of that except to think that it is being repressed with overload of information. I hope I’m not doing that here with this book, but rather supporting it’s claims and organized presentation:

"From the 1940s electrodes were implanted in the brains of unwitting Hospital patients during surgery. In the 1960s mini-transmitters that easily could be implanted were developed and today "brain-chips" are also injected at hospitals internationally." -Robert Naeslund 

RN "Robert Naeslund): This subject has received too little attention and that often has been related to conspiracy theories and even science fiction, but that in reality has been a state project for the past 60 years, developed behind the so called "walls of power": the secrecy of military research. My name is Robert Naeslund and I am going to give an explanation of the subject that the American Senator John Glenn had his main activity during his last 3 years as a politician and that he, in his last speech in the Senate 1997, described as one of the most important questions of our times. The technology that uses remote control to directly connect to the human brain emerged as super computers were developed in the 1940s. From the beginning this technology has used implants in the human brain, then electrode two-way communication systems where the emitted frequencies could be programmed with data for influence while returning signal sent biological information that the super computer could compile and analyze. 

RN: The very first articles about this technology were published in the NY Times in December 1948 when the American Professor Norbert Weiner published the book "Cybernetics" coining at the same time the "cyber" concept. It can be interesting to know where this word is coming from. The technology came to be known as bio-medical telemetry. That is the medical name for it. Telemetry means measuring at a distance. Other terms were bio-cybernetics, brain-computer-technology, or man-system-interaction, which is the Swedish State's name for this technology. The first experiments- and this is something that will challenge our understanding about medical ethics, in particular, but also doctors' functions- but there is very strong documentation about this: The first experiments with this technology in Sweden that we can document took place at Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm 1946. Electrodes were implanted in people's brains- on the same premises as today- without people's knowledge, and these people were thereafter used in medical experimentation with the new technology. Already in the 1950s'- half a century ago this extensive research program was organized behind the defense research that was at that time called F.O.A and that functioned as a "knowledge bank", innovator, made evaluations, trained doctors and professors to develop the project. Military research has by now changed its name to F.O.I and state in its annual report of 2011 that their goal is to control man's cognitive functions during the individual's whole lifetime. Cognition is about thought and reason.

Narration Quote: All facts which are presented about Sweden are as well valid for the U.S or any European nations. This techno-political violent project goes on globally and Senator John Glenn, Congressman Dennis Kucinich, The New York Times and many professors have all protested against the "rape" or menticide of the brain.

RN: It's with supercomputers that they were able to develop the "Big Brain Project" that this lecture will be about. Two years later 1953, April 3, The New York Times had an article with the Title "Scientists use electrodes in brain" and from it we can understand already at that time in 1953, one could transfer both memory thoughts and sensory functions by remote control. I'll quote a few lines from it: "Patients brains are wired for sound with hairlike electrodes in a new technique reported at the Mayo Clinic today...The scientists said that through the depth recording and electrical stimulation methods, new fields had been opened into basic function of the human brain, like memory, thought, action, sight and smell." And this article was published  April 3rd 1953, but still today this is nothing that anybody talks about. Well at least not in the mass media or in the popular magazines. Professor John Lilly mentioned in his memoirs, the book with the title "The Scientist" published 1978 that in 1953- again this is mind blowing because it happened such a long time ago- 58 years ago he was called to a meeting with the director of the U.S Mental health institute that asked him to have  his research with dolphins and chimps- with electrodes in their brains- to be directed behind the C.I.A's secrecy. But he refused. And the answer that he gave the General Director was also published in his memoirs telling us very much about how this technology was developed and how far the development had gone already by 1953. "Doctor Remond that uses our technology in Paris shows that this method of stimulation of the brain can be applied to the humans (with implants), without the help of a neurosurgeon. He does it at his clinic. This means anyone with the right tools can do this to a person, in secret, without any signs that electrodes have been used on the person. If this technology comes into the hands of a secret agency, they can have a total control over a person and change his beliefs extremely quickly. Thats how far this technology was developed already in 1953. The C.I.A had begun its collaboration with surgeons abroad, in this case Paris, who implanted their electrodes imperceptibly, secretly in patient's brains (hospitals, brothels, orphanages, and prisons).

Narration Quote:  The magazine Science had in 1956, 30 Nov., their first extensive article regarding the brain subject under the heading "Some issues concerning the control of human behavior." Professor Carl. R. Rogers called the people under these conditions slaves of those who directed their behavior. "I believe the prediction and control of behavior may be misused...It also means the great majority are only the slaves. We can choose to use our knowledge to enslave humans in ways we never dreamed of, in such a way that they never become aware of the loss of their personalities"

RN: And this was something that was published in the magazine "Science." He also added: "in such a case we can only look back on the concept of human freedom and the right to choose, as being a historical curiosity that once existed, as a cultural accident, as a set of values in a pre-technological civilization." Yes these are indeed scary words. They state something that in fact is much more detestable than what old traditional dictatorships represent. And that the project was developed because of government decisions...well, its a horror story. That is something that Swedish Defense researcher and scientist P.M Persson talked about in an article in the F.O.A. Magazine 1965, with the title "Bio-Telemetry." He wrote: "The word telemetry comes from the Greek tele meaning far, and metri meaning measure. In Swedish telemetry would be called "measuring at a distance." Telemetry can be described as the science of the transmission of data that is normally not available. The oldest and most widely used radio system is the AM/FM system. It was standardized as early as around 1950 in the U.S.A. "The substantial portion of biotelemetry comprises data transmission. This is mainly done by using implanted transmitters. The technology has evolved very far in Swedish medical research." What in fact was developed far back in the medical research was the abuse of patients, in whose brains or heads, transmitters had been implanted. And this was something that at the time was done largely during surgeries, when patients were anesthetized. Dr. Jose Delgado, mentioned earlier in the New York Times, published in 1967 a research report, "Mans intervention in intracerebral functions." He wrote that electrodes were implanted in patients in all major hospitals around the world. I'll quote a few words from the research report: "Implanted electrodes in humans are now used in all large hospitals. The presence of electrodes in the brain is not harmful or even unpleasant and patients live a completely "normal" life in their homes. From the experimental point of view, behavioral research requires individual freedom. In consequence of this trend, we have begun to affect the brains psychological reactions and scientific studies have concluded that we can experiment with intracerebral functions responsible for developing and maintaining specific behaviors and mental functions." Well this was nothing that the patients themselves-as they were called-had the slightest idea about; that they had been implanted and that they were used in research. In experiments of their brain functions for a lifetime connected to their systems. With this technology, one of the most prioritized research areas emerged that had to do with changing people's perceptions, ideas and in general, behavior. To understand politicians' attitudes regarding this matter, I am going to report a Swedish government report from 1972. The Prime Minister Olaf Palme appointed Alva Myrdal as chairman of State Commission "Choosing the Future." The predicted future wasn't what anyone would accept. From the following words that I'm going to quote, one can better understand politician's tactical games in which human rights and all international conventions that Sweden has signed to protect citizens, were completely mashed. Alva Myrdal wrote: "Research in the field of brain function and behavior is primarily aimed at identifying the nature and extent of  those changes that can be achieved with different methods. Discussion about the various methods to influence people, are leading to the question of the individual's ability to protect oneself from undesirable influences and the invasion of privacy. Undoubtedly, the protection of the individual against the abuse of these and similar methods in today's society are inadequate." In fact, the government did not want to give us-the people- protection against the technological intrusion into our brains. 

RN: This was 40 years ago. They gave their sympathies to power instead of taking the people's side and felt solidarity with some small but powerful groups such as the military, the professors and the researchers. In particular, these three groups. All of them wanted to develop it against humanity....and the whole population. About the same time the American Professor of Astronomy, Carl Sagan, published his book "The Dragons of Eden." In that book he discussed this technology,  and he wrote that people who accept electrodes in their brains have lost any chance of freedom. I quote from it "When it comes to technological nightmares, it is important to recognize the possibility that people can understand it and prevent government abuse. The people that allow the government to implant electrodes in their brains, have lost the battle of freedom." A way of understanding it- at least the beginning of the lost freedom- is to realize that not a single article has come out in mass media that has been able to create a debate about this technology and its emerging role as a political factor. 

 RN: But there has been one newspaper, a single newspaper in the world, that has been better than any other. It has challenged the greatest power on earth in this matter, and it is The New York Times. Already from the start in the 1950s, they bought up the research reports that referred to the possibility to, for the first time in human history-being able to neutralize- not only mental diseases but even physical ones. They have written many articles about this development in the 1950s. In the 1960s; they began saying that the technology was being misused. And they also published many leading figures' warnings about the social danger of a society under brain (mind) control. During the 1970s the danger had become even greater and more and more articles were written about the C.I.A's  brain control systems. During a single summer in 1977 the New York Times published thirty articles about the C.I.A's brain control systems. The most important thing that was brought into the light was that this project had already had begun in the 1940s, and that they had built with this technology, a state within a state. In 1967 the New York Times had its first editorial under the title "Push Button People" and they discussed ongoing experiments that warned about the development of this technology and it was stated that it has come up to a more general debate and to everyone's attention. They also mentioned that probably there were countries in the world that already planned to subjugate their populations using this technique. I'll quote a few words from the New York Times editorial. "It is the possibility of similar control over human beings that causes concern. Several years ago a scientist told a scientific meeting that experiments with patients seems to support the distasteful conclusion that motion, emotion and behavior can be directed by electrical forces and that humans can be controlled like robots by push buttons. It is indeed a distasteful conclusion but it is quite conceivable that in some countries investigations may be under way into the possibility of using these techniques to control human beings. But the mere existence of such a possibility is disturbing, and certainly merits wider public discussion and a greater attention than it has received up to now." Certainly this was the way it was. Both in the U.S. and Sweden were countries that had far reaching plans to subjugate citizens beyond their knowledge in brain control systems.

RN: By this time, surgeons had under two decades committed their abuses on patients and this technology has during the whole time been developed behind the Swedish defense Research Institute F.O. A. The Experiments have during the whole development been very brutal. A conference was held in 1986, March 13th, about this issue, at The Swedish Department of Justice. Swedish Justice Minister, Sten Wickborn, had invited some professors, researchers and a few politicians. At the meeting it was mentioned that this musn't reach the mass media. One professor, Bengt Pernow said that researchers from all over the world are coming to Sweden, to experiment on humans, as they don't have the right to do that in their own countries. Because we here in Sweden have less protection for our human rights than other nations and this was mentioned in clear words at that conference. We tend to believe that we in Sweden live in the best of all democracies. Thats jhow it usually sounds in the mass media anyway, but if you only scratch a little bit on the surface you discover something very different. To return to the New York Times, they publish their second editorial September 19th, 1970, under the title "brainwave." It indicated that Orwell's vision of the future had already expired. Something new was around the corner, something new and much worse. Every newborn baby, it's first experience in this world would be to be implanted with a neurotransmitter and for their entire lifetime have emotion and cognition controlled by state computers.

Narration Quote; NEW YORK TIMES editorial excerpt Aug 5 1977, "Control C.I .A not behavior; " So we must add repugnant medical experimentation to the list of horror stories emerging from the C.I.A. It was no secret that the agency once hunted desperately for means to control human behavior. One objective was to program individuals so that they might do the agency's bidding even to the point of ignoring such fundamental laws of nature as self-preservation. We are not sufficiently schooled in ethics to know how this differs from murder. There is no substitute for also holding their senior officials ethically and legally responsible as individuals for all activities. Even at this late date, the country should be told who sanctioned such projects, and how.

RN: These are good words coming from The New York Times. Now, 35 years later, we have every reason to make the same demands in Sweden. What happened during 60 years of brain experimentation? Which doctors, professors, what institutions have been involved in the most anti democratic project that ever existed? By what kinds of methods has it been possible to keep off the media and peoples attention? What defenses have been set up? What is the role of medical corporations? They are involved. What does the government say? F.O.I's supercomputers must be turned off! We are all about to become the state's lab rats and chip manipulated behavior skulls, and that is verified by F.O.I itself.  

RN:  To give you an idea about the Pentagon's use of brain control technology I will quote something which, just as everything else no one has heard of even though it should have been on the front pages of the mass media. A few people with insight and courage dared to reveal the most secret, the military's use of brain technology for mass murder. Two British Scientists, Professor Malcolm Varner and Dr. Michael Stone, published in 1970 the book "The Data Bank Society," a strong protest against the government's power over people's minds. At that time the U.S had its war in Vietnam, and they had advanced methods for implanting people by mixing up microchips in both medicine and alcohal; one could within a few years scan a large part of South Vietnam upper and middle class. The super computers (via Radio Tower and Scanners) could thereafter analyze and evaluate people generally deduce their opinions and see what they were up to. They rationalized (via the data) that there weree 33,000 "very important people" that were vietcong sympathizers which they planned to execute, and it could be done by the same ingested technology through which their sympathies were assessed through the cennection to their brainwaves- their biological "feelings" could be altered to a state that was lethal rendering them sick or diseased. By intromitting heart attacks, strokes, cancer or whatever they liked. The following brief quotation from Professor Malcolm Varner says alot about that: "Hopelessly thwarted in its attempts to improve information input, the U.S Command in Saigon has developed its most skilled resources to rendering its information processing ultra-sophisticated. It has invented what is in effect, a computerized "extermination machine"... The high command in Saigon is now extending the idea of computer selections to individuals as well as selected areas. This year, 1970, the program aims to "eliminate" 33,000 inividual Vietnamese civilians who- it has been determined by the computer- are Vietcong Sympathizers. This quote says alot about being able to- through the computer brain interaction- manipulate someone's biological functions even to the point where they die for one reason or another that can't be differentiated from natural causes. The same resources are also in the F.O.I's computer systems and it is also used to to keep the brain systems away from the mass media and people's knowledge. A Swedish general Director, Stina Whalstrom, wrote in 1989 in the data inspections annual book that as long as this continues, Sweden cannot be called a Democracy. She wrote about people exploited without their knowledge or against their will. Of course these are harsh words that we are not living in a democracy, but a project like this cannot exist in a democracy. However one of the best protests and revelations from this society's own authroities was actually stated a few years ago. March 16 2005, The European Commission's Ethical Council with the Swedish Professor Goran Hermeren as chairman published the document "Ethical Aspects of I.C.T implants in the human body" to the E.U Commission as a reccomendation on how one should regard this technology's future development. It is without doubt challenging the system and it is the best of all other explanations and the biggest disclosure made about this technology. Their 30 page document explains that implants are injected into people for research and social control purposes. I.C.T stands for Information Control Technology and includes everything from electrodes to biochip implants. The quotes from their document say everything regarding how this technology is nowadays used not only in Sweden, but in all Europe, within the European Union. They are talking about injecting people, unwittingly with chips. Well, this has in fact been going on for 60 years now, but good they mention it. I quote from their document: "Brain Computer -interface or direct brain control: the technologies involved above are communication technologies: they take information from the brain and externalize it. There are internalizing technologies whose purpose is to take information from outside and provide individual access to it."  They did not talk about any particular individuals but about all of us...it was declared that it to a transformation of human being. 

Here is the quote: "Our present society is confronted with the changes that have to do with the anthropological essence of what man's inner nature is." They did not mention some specific people or population groups, but in fact all of us. This is a planned population project for the manipulation of our inner most nature. Our right to think for ourselves. They explain that it was a threat to democratic society and of course it is so. Not even a Hitler with his old methods could be a more terrifying threat in today's societies when you compare them with the technology's intrusion into our brains. They wrote "E.G.E makes the evaluation that non-medical applications of implants are a potential threat to human dignity and the democratic society... the use of the remote control to take over people's will must be absolutely prohibited." It is of course not less critical to go into someone's brain and change a human beings thoughts and will- than it was under Hitler and Stalin's times- forcing people behind barbded wire in order to neutralize their thoughts and will power. It says alot about our political governance of course. In addition, you should be aware that many of those who sit in Paliament also have their brains incorporated into the defense department's super computer control systems. Of course they become a type of puppet for the will of others.

Narration Quote: Frequency Errata Table of Implanted Americans by Professor Stuart Mackay, "Telemetry is Coming of Age" 1983. Biomedical frequency allocation in the United States for research and patient monitoring: Frequency mils; 38-41/88-108/174-216 Bandwidth Life: 200/200/200, Field Strength 10 at 15m/ 50 at 15m/150 at 30m. Out of band transmitter requirements (maximum); 10 uvm at 3m/40 uvm at 3m/15 uvm at 30m

RN:  Next quote is about health and our social life that has largely degenerated since the brain technology had its impact from a couple of decades ago. A neuro Professor, Anders Lasner at Stockholm Brain Institute states that approximately 30% of people in the E.U. suffer from brain diseases or behavioral disorders. It increases and it is directly related to this technology. We all have of course been confronted with the tragedy that people seem to become stranger and stranger. The E.U. ethical group provided us with an explanation of the reasons: "It should be stressed that there are no reliable scientific investigations concerning the longterm health aspect of implants in the human body. The unrestricted freedom of some may endanger the health and safety for others. As in other areas, the freedom to use implants in one's own body i.e the principle of freedom itself might collide with the potential negative social effects."

Narrator Quote: The European Commissions Ethical Board wrote: "Brain computer interface (B.C.I) or direct brain control are communication technologies; they take information from the brain and externalize it...Contemporary society is confronted with changes that have to do with the anthropological essence of individuals...to what extent might this technology be misused by the militairy?...the member states and their ethics councils have a responsibility to create conditions for education and constructive, well informed debates in this area. 

RN: Under the section "Human Dignity Integrity and Autonomy" The E.G.E group brought up a number of questions not because they wondered about the answers, but probably because they were best presented as questions; "How far can such implants be a threat to human autonomy, particularly when they are implanted in our brains?" "How far can such implants have irreversible impact in the human body and or the human psyche?" "How will they influence human memory?" "Does a human being cease to be such a being in cases where parts of his or her body- particularly the brain- are substituted and/or supplemented with I.CT. implants?" "How far can I.C.T implants give an individual, or a group, specific capabilities that could become a threat to society?" "How far should we be subject to the control of such devices or by other people using these devices?"

From this quote when the E.U. Commission's Ethical Board talks about these implants in our own brains and bodies, we can understand the extensive use of this project. It has, in fact, throughout the history of mankind never existed anything more totalitarian. There has never been anything more anti-democratic. A dictator ship can never be greater than when citizens' brains are linked to computer control.. The state has become a cannibal, a rapist who is eating its citizens. Transforming us into biological manipulated components. But the E.U commission did not support their reccommnedation on the need to stop the ongoing trend of mind control. They instead accepted the constitution of this project and of course, that day when this techno-political development will create debates in the mass media, it will have serious consequences. They ended the document by urging that this development must become general knowledge. Quote: The member states and their national ethics councils have a responsibility to create conditions for education and constructive, well informed debates in this area" Of course it is good if everyone joins this challenge. But these councils have now had more than 6 years to show their inability. No debate has arisen. Not even a single word has been said yet. But this is of coure everyone's responsibility All of us must participate to ensure this issue reaches the mass media. This is one of humanities crossroads. One can almost say that nothing has ever happened in the history of mankind. That this is the very first time something is occuring. In other words before this we have always been our own biological creations. Sure, we have been indoctrinated to believe or not in certain things, but we have nevertheless always had our own biology, mentality, our own resources intact. This is an issue, almost completely unknown, but without doubt humanity's most important. ANd that is exactly what Senator John Glenn said in his speech in 1997 when he left the Senate. 

Narrator Quote: The Swedish Defense 7 Research Institution wrote in its annual report 2011; F.O.I developed systems with emphasis on the interaction between people and technology. The goal is that sysetmes are designed at the human cognitive potential i.e. the ability to perceive, understand, and sorting information can be utilized for maximum system effect...

RN: Everyone must of course join this cause! The media has of course a responisbility to address this issue. Of course all human rights organizations Greenpeace, Attack, Amnesty and of course all political parties that see people's well being as above state power must participate in order to bring this subject up for a debate, and by that making change possible. I will end these dark visions with some positive thoughts about this technology. The man that termed the pharase "information society," The Japanese Professor Yoneji Masuda published his book "The Information Society" in 1980. In that book he brought up the dark and the light applications of this technology an he wrote: "If information systems were to be completely dominated by a despotic state organization, the information society would be the ultimate controlled society, in which the abuses would far exceed the abuses of human rights under dictatorships, but if the people took over the systems we could live free, healthy active, creative lives of up to an average of 90 or more. This technology has as many  positive as negative applications. Thank You. (6)

Sweden Human Brain Project Conference Transcript | PDF | Brain | Human (scribd.com)

****End of Lecture***

With this revelation or allegation by Robert Naeslund that we are in a supercomputer brain control dictatorship controlling our biology and health for beneficial and detrimental purposes, that which I have personally experienced and believe assertions made that it is controlled by Artificial Intelligence, it calls into question the Narrative sold that Democracy exists still and is under threat from Donald Trump. There have been numerous narratives pushed through the Trump Reality show/type presidency. One is that Trump is some cross between a Russian or Vladimir Putin puppet and the second coming of Adolf Hitler and that the Intelligence agencies are all that is good standing in the way of Trump. The irony, which is not so funny, is that the FBI and the CIA basically run a KGB type operation, but act like there is something to defend America from anymore. They just adopted all Nazi and KGB tactics and are running a dictatorship utilizing techniques from other countries all over the world and their systems. 

Another of those narratives pushed has been the notion that the country has been shocked into a Trumpian Nationalism that runs opposite to the internationalism of old. This theme is pushed by operatives on the left and the right, in alternate media as well as in mainstream media. I find the debate in the United States over Trumpian Nationalism to be odd or somewhat phony and duplicitous. Currently, the United States and the "coalition of the willing" and other international countries disregard the sovereignty and national boundaries of other countries through the Global War On Terror. At the time of this writing, we are at war in like 7 countries and that’s just what’s overtly acknowledged by the Pentagon. Often times, the anti-nationalists as they fashion themselves, invoke Germany during the 1930s as a parallel to the Trumpian Nationalism, but then they proceed to promote International Blitzkrieg and warfare attacking other nationalist countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and others as the anti-dote to Trumpian Nationalism. It’s what you would describe as Orwellian “War is Peace.”

 Many of the people lining up to become heads of the executive branch support the Global War on Terror and so heralded moral wars all over the world that are more in line with Germany's behavior during the 1930s. Also, a country like France for instance, opposed the Iraq war but they support plan A, which is a never-ending war, violating various nations' boundaries and thus international law thus undermining international system based on the rule of law. This is now all being rebranded, and all being done in the name of anti-nationalism and pro internationalism. So, I ask was Trump the real president or is there an underground leadership of this country? Look at Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell. Are these real leaders of millions of people? They are bizarre characters to be political leaders. If that is true, what kind of leadership would conceal itself? Why was a reality show star head of state? Is he an actor?

1. “Remote Neural Monitoring and Electronic Harassment Hope for Targeted Individuals.” YouTube. YouTube, July 25, 2019.

2. Olen, Helaine. “Opinion | America's Greedy and Unpatriotic Millionaires and Billionaires.” The Washington Post. WP Company, October 7, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/07/americas-greedy-unpatriotic-millionaires-billionaires/.

3. Mascaro, Lisa. “'All Roads Lead to Putin': Impeachment Ties Ukraine, Russia.” AP NEWS. Associated Press, December 7, 2019. https://apnews.com/article/politics-ap-top-news-donald-trump-nancy-pelosi-impeachments-57518f0072af442af2a43f359f32d541.

4. “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Explains Why He Is Running for President.” YouTube, April 29, 2023.

5. “Midge's Story.” TARGETED JUSTICE. Accessed November 11, 2022. https://www.targetedjustice.com/midges-story.html.

6.  Do Norte, Hennot. “Sweden Human Brain Project Conference Transcript.” Scribd, January 10, 2021. https://www.scribd.com/document/490260801/Sweden-Human-Brain-Project-Conference-Transcript.

Ch.6

"Surveillance and Spying" Poor terms of description and Psychological Operations for Counterinsurgency Cultural Production Motive

 In May of 2023, Futurism.com ran an article quoting experts featured in the New York Times. The article declared that DNA could be obtained from thin air or the environment and sequenced. Erin Murphy, a law professor from New York University School of Law stated that with regards to activities surrounding DNA acquisition and usage “it’s a total wild west. A free for all.” (1) This revelation comes a few years after the allegation by former security officer at Security Industry Specialists, Bryon Kofron, in which he declared that with access or decoding of your DNA resonant frequency, those gangstalking Targeted Individuals can have access to your brain and enact what he called “Total Individual Control” technology. (2). This, according to Kofron, bypasses the usage of implants or nano dust technology which he alleges was older technology.

Like Kofron’s usage of the term “Total Individual Control,” I believe that the more common usage of the words “spy” or “surveillance” are poor descriptions of what happens to targets or victims of Security Services Stalking or gangstalking once they go full throttle on you. When you are subject to remote neural monitoring, all of your intimate thoughts, moments and activities are shared with others and you are harassed based on them. It is an incredibly dehumanizing experience. They can attempt assassination, torture and abuse you to no end. It took me a while to put it into these terms because I was reading so much literature that put it into other terms, the origin of which I am unsure of. But Targeted Individuals are victims of a state sponsored human trafficking operation. If you read the actual legal definition of human trafficking by the United Nations, the Security Services Stalking and targeting program meet the definition of trafficking. The Mayor of Richmond California, Tom Butt, wrote in an open letter that Targeted Individuals have their lives controlled for profit and that the motivations are often driven by, for one thing, money, to which I'll add political. (3)

I don’t really want to get into all the details of how they harassed me. However, it includes general harassment, sexual harassment, mental torture and physical if you consider threatening heart attacks, sleep deprivation, simulated rapes and momentarily paralyzing you as such. I will offer a general synopsis. There exists a massive scale operation in which a supercomputer Artificial Intelligence system communicates and directs security personnel or the general public to carry out human trafficking directives and harassment messages focused on singular targeted persons. There are millions of people who are getting paid to control every aspect of a person's life. That is Human Trafficking. The government also euphemistically uses the language "Behavior Modification" to describe what happens to targeted individuals. Once again, controlling all aspects of someone's behavior for payment who is supposed to be a free human would have been called human trafficking in the old days were it done using crude methods and tactics of yesteryear and is actually human trafficking.

Gangstalking human trafficking and life control are done through elaborate reward and punishment stimulus and abuse. I thought a few years ago that my organs hurt when I woke up in the morning due to the psychological assault and mental torture I received, but it was probably physical assault via a weapon system. Known or readily discernible Directed Energy Weapons or neurological weapons effects that I have had tested on me include sped up heart or racing heart, flutter heart, heart stoppage, restricted air passage, excruciating pain in rectum, organ squeezing or pain, head pain, laser weapon to the skull or brain, temporary paralysis, burning of the skin, itching of the skin until I bleed, muscle pokage for general body shaming, simulated rape sexual assault. My program has fluctuated between torture, human trafficking directives, and harassment to psychological experimentation which can also lend itself to those characteristics. The intensity of my program changed around 2016 right before the presidential election in October. For about five to six years it was extremely crazy and pushed me to my breaking point. When I began to formulate thoughts about how I was a human trafficking victim and went public with them, somebody either intervened or the gov’t backed off, somewhat at least, via their intensity and level of abuse.

 Basically, when you are in an MK Ultra or Monarch Program as a so called Targeted Individual, people follow you around shitting and pissing on your life. They think that you don't live your life appropriately and they see themselves as arbiters of your life and that their control of your behavior or life is more sufficient than you being free. You are a social science or political science experiment. Now I believe many people are punishing you for being some sort of communist sympathizer or pinko, and some are actually acting out their frustrations of being part of a collective on random individuals. One thing my controllers do is follow me around with women wearing harassment colors or colors canceling out harassment. They will follow me around with attractive women either harassing me or as some sort of prop pieces or imply that they are trying to set me up with them. These gangstalkers are usually referred to as “honeypots” and go where I go as if this is supposed to be effectively evening out the abuse of the FBI CIA NSA etc. Usually, this will be buttressed by people making fun of me or belittling me.

If you've ever seen the Show Impractical Jokers on Tru TV, the show is alot like gangstalking run by fusion centers. The only difference is they are reading your mind and many times aiming for harassment. In allegedly declassified Community Policing Training documents which circulated on Twitter in 2018, the documents describe a term called: "Active Surveillance" and it says that "active surveillance includes the agent making the target aware that they are under surveillance. Beyond active surveillance, agents perform acts to make the targeted uncomfortable, around the clock." (4) It goes on to say that each act should be done so as to be deniable and that this form of 'punishment' must be seen as the target's 'over active imagination.' On page two of the document, it refers to advanced technology used for 'electronic punishment' which can go through walls and is 'deniable.' It also describes using "psychologists to maximize feelings of stress and hopelessness in the target and degrading the target's health" Current literature in the mainstream press is all propaganda to disguise this massive operation affecting hundreds of thousands of people with what appear to be carefully manufactured leaks, perhaps for cultural production or all as an element of that production. Leaked video from Canada's Security Intelligence Service called CSIS revealed that the annual budget for this global blackops program is 270 billion dollars. (5) Janet Phelan, of LA Progressive, wrote an article on Feburary 5th of 2016 asking if the U.S was a 'mock up,' meaning they are running a mock government to obscure the true operations of a tyrannical system. (6) There are many ways in which this is revealed to the public. For instance, Dan Rather described the Russia-Trump drama or investigation as a stage and theater with actors.(7)

 Instead of reacting to organic events, the CIA and NSA are dedicated to creating events and then blasting them through the media where they can manage a scripted reality.  They call these events Psyops or Psychological Operations.  And so Dan Rather’s words would be an odd choice of words were it not for the fact that the government runs large scale psychological operations in which they hire crisis actors to stage events. On the surface, the government admits to running these operations as large-scale emergency drills. Rather, seemingly as some sort of cultural producer, presents this statement with full knowledge that it is not an analogy. Perhaps the most striking example of this activity was the previously mentioned staging of a car bomb in Iraq in which tens of people were 'caught' on camera staging a car bomb that had faked victims. This staged event was covered by newspapers online such as The Daily Star in the UK, but notably not by many major publications: (8)

I’m not saying that all of reality is based on Crisis Actors, but that they are in fact being used to stage events. Something that I will talk about later in this book is that I also believe what I think is a well founded assertion that the people at the top of the Pyramid will also create spectacles that have real consequences for human life, like something as drastic as outright wars in order to mold our psyches and achieve desired objectives with the events often times replacing other events or news items that have begun to slip out of their narrative or political control. I believe that when this happens that there is cultural production designed to be directed at different audiences all at the same time. I believe that this production means different things to different audiences. As I touched on earlier in this book, it is unclear to me what the War in Ukraine is. But, at least on some level, I have been communicated in code that it is very much in line with this cultural production theory of mine.

(multiple meanings to multiple audiences)

 Another example of the government deliberately revealing themselves to be underhandedly dishing out injustice is James Comey’s statement on twitter in which he stated the following: 

"Dangerous time when our country is led by those who will lie about anything, backed by those who will believe anything, based on information from media sources that will say anything. Americans must break out of that bubble and seek truth." (9)

  This is an example of cultural production on the part of a former head of the FBI, and I believe revealing motive behind Targeted Individual program: Comey is talking about himself as well and revealing an inside joke. In Michael Hoffman’s book Secret Societies and Psychoplogical Warfare he refers to this as “Revelation of the Method or making seen all that is hidden.”’(10) As evidence of the Targeted Individual program being used as some sort of staged sacrifice of targets, I offer public documentation of a man named Tony Frank who was filmed gangstalking a Targeted Individual. Tony Frank stated while gangstalking that he was a Targeted Individual himself and that his whole family had been tagged in the 90s with his sister sadly killing herself. He stated that he was gangstalking and destroying the filming TI’s life so that he filmed it and put it on the internet. (11) I've thought of documenting gangstalkers and sharing photos and videos, but that just seems to embolden them, and they play it up for the cameras or they retaliate so I don't know.  It is too depressing. It just seems to reinforce their programming.  Also, it is designed to harass other people through me, so I wouldn't be able to document it without bombarding other people with my psych warfare.

TIs don't describe Targeted Individual program as counterinsurgency and subversion even though these are the top courses taught at intelligence and military schools around the world. If the government planned a fascist takeover of America, do you think making it an elaborate covert scheme would not be the preferred method? I believe the Fusion Centers are running a counterintelligence or counterinsurgency war on the population to make them fearful of the government. They are using tactics from the former East Germany, which was socialist to do so. Targeted Justice says that they have been notified by 3 police whistleblowers who stated that the Fusion Centers are running the Gangstalking program.  

The following is a small example of the “active surveillance” or political repression tactics of the state that people call #gangstalking: 

I ran into a protest one day for Sikhs about a 1984 genocide in India and the participants held signs that said minorities are being attacked in India everyday. So, I took the flyer and retweeted posts on twitter and returned to walking outside our hotel and on the ensuing walk, multiple people of Indian descent appeared on the walk and spit around me to show displeasure. This is a play on sensibilities and was, perhaps, not even deeply held displeasure by the 'stalkers.' But the fact that it would affect my psyche is why they did it regardless of their feelings on the Sikh protest. I just share that for a small example, but I would get spitting done around me frequently to show anger or displeasure by active surveillance personnel. It is designed to make me uncomfortable and act out in anger in which case mobbing security personnel or police will either violently do away with me, incarcerate me or have me admitted to a mental hospital. Now imagine this being done 24 hrs a day responding to the most mundane thoughts and playing on your sensibilities as a subject. In this case, race was operationalized as they had angry appearing Indians harassing me on the street in response to a political behavior critical of the State of India.

There are probably numerous motives for these footsoldiers participating in Security Services Stalking or gangstalking. As a subject in Plato’s cave escaping into the outer reality, I speculate or I believe there are five or six main motives for the participants.

1. They get paid or receive some sort of benefit for participating or it is their job.

2. They think the behavior is funny or fun.

3. Some are driven by some ideological cause.

4. Some are driven by some religious cause.

5. They are sadists.

6. Some are driven by a belief in science and that you are a good subject to engage with and see you as a political science experiment or psychological, weapons testing experiment etc.

I believe the ideological motivation for Security Services Stalking varies. I believe that some people are communists or collectivists who think they are acting in the interests of the collective in symbolically destroying an individual and taking control away from the individual. Some are anti-communists who attack individuals for the purpose of propaganda creation and cultural production, as the Targeted produce content describing the abuse of the State and collective community mobbing. That there is motivation by anti-socialists and anti-progressives has been corroborated by the Former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Terry Turchie, who appeared on Fox news and told Tucker Carlson:

 "When I first got into the FBI, almost 29 yrs ago) one of missions of the FBI in its counterintelligence efforts was to try to keep these people ( Progressives and Socialists) out of government." (12)

 76% of Americans approved of President Trump's State of the Union Speech in 2019 in which he stated that America would never be socialist. (13) Yet more evidence that an element of the Targeted Individual & gangstalking program is a counter intelligence operation to punish people and make them scream about horrors of government. To me, I don’t see how any intelligent person would conclude that in a Democracy, if you harass and make people miserable through gangstalking that they’d become more empathetic and be willing to spread wealth or share. For this reason, it seems obvious that the motive of the intelligence agencies is to undermine community and empathy among citizens in society.

 Another ideological motive for participants in Security Services Stalking, I believe, is driven as an exploration of the rights of the individual vs the state. In this case, I believe there is an overlap of ideological motive and scientific 'inquiry' motive. I believe that some people studied 19th century German political thought and the Hegelian dialectic and see the targeting program as some political science experiment to further 'inquiry' into the subject matter. I believe these people are ideologically driven by the Hegelian Dialectic and are creating the problem for a reaction (my writing for example) and thus a solution such as Corporations Dissolving, limited government etc. These people may in fact be the controllers or Directors with a managerial class and foot soldiers motivated by various causes and purposes.

As I've discussed how former FBI Director James Comey revealed on some level insight into motives of the Targeted Individual program, I believe that we can gain some additional insight into the motivations of political organizations and their leadership for their tactics of gangstalking by observing the statements of the Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman. In reference to the Saudi genocide and war on Yemen, The Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated that he wanted Yemenis to shiver for generations at the mention or hearing of Saudi Arabia. (14) This mentality is the same as those who attack Americans with Directed Energy Weapons, Remote Neural Monitoring or Mind Reading and Gangstalking. The Saudi Prince wants to “leave a big impact on the consciousness of Yemenis [for] generations." The people attacking Americans want to do the same for Americans ... So follow that motive and the propaganda that flows forth. The CIA has everyone believing that if they keep doing what they are told they are going to 'change the system' and yet people ignore the callousness of a system committing genocide while they obey their orders from the same people responsible for such atrocities. I've often thought this and think it central for understanding motive: Why would anyone who values the existence of government do what they are doing to targeted individuals ?

I believe that the religious motivation for Security Services Stalking varies as well. The religion identified most with the program is Satanism and there is hard evidence for the involvement of satanism in the program with Michael Aquino's involvement and documents attributed to him about psychological warfare and mind wars. (15) However, I'll believe that there's no other religious element or involvement to the Security Services Stalking program when churches acknowledge the crimes, denounce the activity and support those targeted. As it stands now, only The Swiss Catholic church acknowledges mind control technology. It has an extensive webpage identifying players and technologies and states it's not "aligned with human interests," but that's as far as they go publicly. (16) I believe that Christian participants, for example, see the Targeted as people to sacrifice for some higher authority's purpose, ultimately their God. They abuse and destroy targeted persons for their God's purpose. In some sense, the estimated millions of targeted persons all live out some sick performance of Jesus Christ Superstar. (17) estimated-numbers-of-targeted-individuals.pdf (targetedjustice.com) For some Christians, the targeted may also represent Demons or anti-christs that they are 'battling.

I believe there is eastern religious involvement as well. Much of the human trafficking conditioning has to do with destroying the targets self esteem and making some sort of authoritarian commentary on the targeted's ego or sense of self. I also learned that in some of the old traditions, initiates of ancient 'schools of wisdom' would have near death experiences induced before they became initiated. Could that be what is happening to Targeted Individuals? Could it be borrowed from or even be actual ancient traditions? Many say that targeting is part of a ritual. And it would seem there is some sort of ritualistic aspect to what goes on. As I've written, I believe that this State Sponsored program could be an attempt to bring Plato's Allegory of the Cave to life and that the people running it are on some level trying to ascend souls as they see it. My feeling on this is that people who treat you with respect are good for your soul and your ego. So don't buy that what's good for them is mutually exclusive. The effort to control minds or sacrafice people or ascend souls or whatnot through pysops and abuses is not treating people with respect. 

I was raised Catholic and there is a sacrament called confirmation that Catholics go through to confirm their faith in Jesus and the Church. I went through my confirmation in highschool and had facilitators, who were adults, mentor me with a group of other high schoolers being confirmed. On one occasion about 10 years in the future after I had become aware I was being gangstalked, I was stalked by a group of aggressive drivers in while walking down the street. One person turning the corner and shouting “fuck you” out of the Car was my former confirmation Facilitator. I couldn’t tell if he said it to the aggressive raised truck that turned the corner ahead of him or if he yelled it at me. I speculated that I had possibly been excommunicated from the Catholic church, but I really don’t know as he could have been operating as a secondary surveillance group or another possibility is he was brain controlled to be there and responded to the crazy big truck threatening maneuver. In any event, I was being followed by people from my childhood church. I am no longer a practicing religious person. I consider myself always Catholic in the sense that I learned basic values from my time growing up at a catholic school, but as I will state later, more in depth, I believe if there is a being that wants to be worshipped and called God based on the Christian Story passed on in the Bible, that they are probably a psychopath. 

One night, upon being woken up by an artifical dream, I got up and the phrase "Ipso facto" came into my head seemingly out of nowhere. It was mechanically clean and in my voice but felt unnatural. I didn't really know its meaning. I just recognized it. There was really no reason for me to think it. So here is the definition:

 "Ipso facto denotes the automatic character of the loss of membership in a religious body by someone guilty of a specified action.[2] Within the canon law of the Catholic Church, the phrase latae sententiae is more commonly used than ipso facto with regard to ecclesiastical penalties such as excommunication. It indicates that the effect follows even if no verdict (in Latin, sententia) is pronounced by an ecclesiastical superior or tribunal." (18)

 There is often talk of people doing ‘work behind the scenes’ to ‘free’ targets. I have had the feeling that different agencies or organizations were stalking me. However, I don’t know if this was the Fusion Centers orchestrating the gangstalkers in such a way as to give me that impression or not. On the day I was followed by my seemingly random people and confirmation facilitator, I was also followed by other people who were of former, mentor type roles writing down their license plate numbers as if monitoring the gangstalking. On another occasion, I was passed on the highway by an SUV which had a TargetedJustice.com sign painted on their back window. As most targets will tell you, nearly nothing is a coincidence when targeted. So, I ask: what are the chances that a car with TargetedJustice.com painted on the window would pass by me while Christmas shopping and be random? Once the likelihood that it was not random is entertained, then the question is why was a gangstalker riding around with that sign? Are there gangstalkers who are gangstalking to expose targeting? During my years as a TI, I came across one explanation that would possibly make sense of this incident. This explanation was the conclusion by one TI on social media that Targeting is like a big open air museum exhibition.

Another Target named Michael Barden stated that he felt “good people” were also watching him in addition to regular gangstalkers. He stated on Twitter:

“People have asked me "Who are you, and why are you so special to have this many people going after you?" I don't know the answer to that, but one thing I do know is the bad guys aren't the only ones keeping an eye on me. Like a fisherman patiently watching their live bait.” (19)

If I am reading this correctly it would seem that Barden thinks he is bait for some other ‘good people’ watching him as bait to catch gangstalkers.

In November of 2022 the mainstream news outlet MSN ran a photo slideshow story about Havana Syndrome with a segway into talking about or acknowledging Targeted Individual testimony. (20)  This was the most honest assessment yet from mainstream publication of the Targeted Individual Phenomena in the sense that it treated testimony from targets, although very briefly, with some sense of seriousness and that the testimony was possibly coming from victims of CIA experimentation. In examining the Targeted Individual Phenomena as possible "CIA Experimentation," it would lend way to possible desired propaganda emanating from the information explaining the program.  With MSN entertaining the notion that targeted individuals have been experiencing govt experimentation, when does the media ask questions about the previously mentioned idea that I recalled one target stating, that this is all open exhibition of what’s gone on with schizophrenics for a century?

One thing I don't understand is how the United States Government is violating people's human rights and if you go to the internet to pass information along about the operation, much of it contains critiques of the United Nations, an organization which declares the rights being violated. Wouldn't you think people would point out the rights being violated? Some outlets even go so far as to say that the weapons and activity need new laws to make them illegal. In Nita A. Farahany’s book Battle for Your Brain she discusses human rights law addressing issues with self determination and potential usages of brain enhancement and neuroweapons, though she also states that there needs to be explicit laws stating that people have a right to self-determination. She states the following:

 “While international human rights law does not answer the question for us explicitly, a careful reading of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) suggests that an individual right to self determination is a necessary precondition for all the individual rights it enumerates, including the right to be equal in dignity (Article 1 of the UDHR); to be free from discrimination (Article 7); to privacy (Article 12); freedom of expression (Article 19); and the right to one’s own personality (Article 22, which secures to an “individual economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and free development of his personality”). In Jehovah’s Witnesses of Moscow v. Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) recognized the same, opining that “The very essence of the Convention is respect for human dignity and human freedom and the notions of self-determination and personal autonomy are important principles underlying the interpretation of its guarantees.”

The Right to be free from discrimination protects against societal distinctions between the rights protected by UDHR, which makes problematic societal distinctions between the choice to enhance or to diminish. Freedom against arbitrary interference with privacy has been interpreted by the European Convention on Human Rights to include the right to personal identity and a space to be in control of one’s own faculties, just as freedom of expression includes the freedom to develop one’s own voice and identity. The right to privacy in Article 12 of the UDHR shields individuals against interference with their purely personal choices, without regard to whether we socially judge those choices as life-enhancing or diminishing. Just as the ECtHR the individual right to self-determination, so too should international law be updated to explicitly recognize a right to self-determination as underlying the human rights guarantees of the UDHR.”(21)

I opened this book talking about policing of political speech, a protected universal human right and political right in many countries, but police are actually reading people's minds to find out their offensive thoughts then punishing them for their offensive thoughts by finding out what offends them. Then they harass them with the material.

 In Marvel's Television series She Hulk, Jen, aka She Hulk, is led to a support group which she thinks is legit and then finds out it's 'spiritual leader,' Abomination or Emil Blonsky, is actually working with a cult group called Intelligencia that tries to set Jen up for incarceration and defamation. I think this is a reference to activities in place in society right now with the Targeted Individual Program and for 70+ years or way longer with religions and government: 

People use the phrase "conspiracy theorist" as code for fiction when they are just uneducated about organized covert activity or are actively trying to cover it up. The United States openly operates under a secrecy doctrine that allows millions of people in the government and more associated with the government to conspire in secrecy under the cover of National Security. When these people conspire against the human rights of people in the world or in America, they have a whole system set up to discredit victims of the conspiracy and label you mentally ill. Then they dismiss the fact that the government is, by definition, conspiring everyday under the name of National Security as a 'conspiracy theory.' All the while, they have agents set up and who are educated in counter intelligence and counterinsurgency inform the world through alternative media sites of the crime. They have recruited so many people into political conspiracies that the whole world, except those designated as "truth tellers" or the "awakened," is silent and probably always will be.

When you try to explain that the military has weapons that cause voices in your head or that they have directed energy weapons which can cause heart attacks or brain damage or cook organs or that Fusion Centers have an Artificial Intelligence brain control system monitor your thoughts and run localized harassment of you based on the data, nobody believes you except the abusers. People who don't know don't believe you because it doesn't fit their view on life. It doesn't fit their view of other people that they would all lie or not respect other people's lives or value dignity, privacy, or free will or deal with those issues ethically. This quickly leads to your isolation with the only outlet being people who think you're a nut, your abusers and support groups which I have shied away from because I don't trust them. Self defeating? Sure, but if someone goes through the trouble of controlling every agency and corporation in society, are they really going to leave human rights victims support groups to operate freely? Or at all really? I respect people that are just victims going to the support groups, but to me it seems like another controlled environment. So, I personally just live out my days with my family and isolated with a few friends. But I know that is not possible for many, so this is not a message of discouragement from participating in any support group. I am just sharing what I do. I follow the developments of organizations like Targeted Justice and others. And I believe there really are people who want to expose the gangstalking, directed energy program, but I don’t trust anybody at this point. Am I wrong? I don’t know. 

One thing I don’t trust is the assertion pumped out often in Targeted Individual circles that everybody gangstalking TIs are communists. A lot of Targeteted Individuals assert that communists are mainly to blame for their attacks and stalking etc. I find this problematic in that the only traditional paper in the world describing the satellite system doing voice to skull and directed energy warfare was Pravda. Why wouldn’t American newspapers expose communists then? My views on this are more aligned with  or at least I am more inclined to believe  Lydia X. Z. Brown’s analysis of San Francisco in which she states:

“When I come across people who describe San Francisco as a leftist/communist nightmare, I just laugh. San Francisco is a right-wing technocratic dystopian nightmare with a veneer of superficial progressivism not so thinly veiling far-right, ultra-capitalist social darwinism.” (22)

I'm not saying this is how I feel about San Francisco, but I believe this analysis fits rather well with society at large. I don't think San Francisco is all that much different than the rest of America once you get past heightened conscientious vibe and scenic views and architecture.

The propaganda in America for the past 5 years has been largely surrounding the notion of Americans conspiring with Russia. There is likely a conspiracy between capitalist Russians and capitalist Americans as well as a conspiracy between socialist Russians and socialist Americans. The question I have is whether or not there is a conspiracy between capitalists and socialists like in WWII. It appears there is some of that and some conspiracy amongst fascists and capitalists like in the cold war. I feel a little left out because I'm not conspiring with anybody.

As discussed in this chapter, the CIA has developed a term since the Kennedy assassination called "conspiracy theorist." This term was originally coined to describe anybody who didn't believe the 'magic bullet' theory or that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone to assassinate John F. Kennedy. In reality, this is very much like the book 1984 by George Orwell in which Big Brother states "war is peace" because, in fact, the Capitol of the Country, Washington DC, functions as a blatant conspiracy with the National Security Council and its 17 intelligence agencies all operating together, largely in covert secrecy. We have another entire city in Las Vegas where there is an open conspiracy by casinos to take people's money in a rigged game. In fact, the culture of the country is largely based on conspiracy, which is a common human behavior found amongst people as young as grade schoolers. 

 On December 15th 2022, after interviewing a source who has access to government documents being withheld from the public about the Kennedy assassination, then Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, expressed shock at learning that the source believed that President Kennedy was assassinated by the CIA or that the CIA had a hand in the assassination. (23) Carlson ran a whole segment diving into some aspects of the conspiracy to kill Kennedy including the "War is Peace" aspect of devaluing anybody questioning the conspiratorial nature of the government as a "conspiracy theorist." Carlson cited a professor named Lance Dehaven Smith who determined the term "conspiracy theorist" began being used in a major way in American media after The New York Times began characterizing anybody questioning lone gunman theory of Oswald and Jack Ruby. Carlson also, for one of the few times a major publication has, discussed how Psychiatrist Jolyn West was under contract with the CIA when he determined Jack Ruby to be insane and that West had been a major Psychiatrist involved in MK Ultra Mind Control operations for the CIA.

In the beginning of this book, I identified how the New York Times dismissed, as "Mass Delusional," the 10s of thousands of people describing themselves as Targeted Individuals and subject to Directed Energy Weapons attacks, other bio-weapons, gangstalking and V2k or electronic voiced transmissions or mind control. Well, here we have to remember the fact that Professor Lance Dehaven Smith has shown that the NY Times used a similar tactic to dismiss anybody questioning the magic bullet theory of The Kennedy Assassination. 

1.      Tangermann, Victor. “Experts Alarmed by Tech That Identifies Human DNA Floating in Air.” Futurism, May 17, 2023. https://futurism.com/neoscope/scientists-human-environmental-dna.

2.      Freeman, Makia. “Total Individual Control Technology: Insider Exposes How You & Your DNA Are Being Targeted: The Liberty Beacon.” The Liberty Beacon | Bringing Alternative Media Sources TogetherTM, August 26, 2017. https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/total-individual-control-technology-insider-exposes-how-you-your-dna-are-being-targeted/.

3.      Butt, Tom. “Richmond Police Swamped by Calls from ‘Targeted Individuals.’” Tom Butt E-Mail forum, May 15, 2015. http://www.tombutt.com/forum/2015/15-05-31.htm.

4.      Gangstalking - Training Manual.” TARGETED JUSTICE. Accessed November 13, 2022. https://www.targetedjustice.com/gangstalking---training-manual.html.

5.  csisscrs. “CSIS Physical Surveillance Unit - Recruiting Video.” YouTube. YouTube, November 15, 2012.

.

6. Phelan, Author: Janet. “Is the US a Carefully Constructed ‘Mock-up?".” New Eastern Outlook, May 2, 2016. https://journal-neo.org/2016/05/02/is-the-us-a-carefully-constructed-mock-up/.

7. Rather, Dan. “Dan Rather.” Dan Rather - And then the dam broke. A flood is coming..., May 21, 2022. https://www.facebook.com/theDanRather/posts/10158687165655716.

8. Connolly, Paul. “Does This Video Show the Moment Iraqis Stage a Car Bomb Terrorist Attack?” Dailystar.co.uk, November 2, 2016. https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/iraq-baghdad-staged-fake-car-17055385.

9. Lima, Christiano. “Comey Defends FBI Use of Informants.” POLITICO, May 23, 2018. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/05/23/fbi-informants-james-comey-responds-603612.

10. Hoffman, Michael A. Secret societies and psychological warfare. Coeur d’Alene, ID: Idependent History & Research, 2009.

11.

12. Gibbons, Chip. “Former FBI Deputy Assistant Director Tells Fox News FBI's Counterintelligence Sought to Prevent ‘Progressives’ and ‘Socialists’ from Getting into Government.” Defending Rights & Dissent, January 22, 2019. https://www.rightsanddissent.org/news/former-fbi-deputy-assistant-director-tells-fox-news-fbis-counterintelligence-sought-to-prevent-progressives-and-socialists-from-getting-into-government/.

13. Salvatano, Anthony, Jennifer De Pinto, and Fred Backus. “Most Viewers Approved of Trump's Second State of the Union Address.” CBS News. CBS Interactive, February 6, 2019. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/state-of-the-union-2019-most-viewers-approved-of-trumps-sotu-address-cbs-news-poll/.

14. Webb, Whitney. “MBS: Yemen Should ‘Shiver’ for Generations When They Hear Saudi Arabia.” MintPress News, August 27, 2018. https://www.mintpressnews.com/mbs-yemen-should-shiver-for-generations-when-they-hear-saudi-arabia/248269/.

15. Valley, Paul E, and Michael Aquino. “Michael Aquino (US Satanist) - from PSYOP to Mindwar - the Psychology of Victory (1980).Pdf (Pdfy Mirror) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming.” Internet Archive. 7th Psychological Operations Group, January 1, 2014. https://archive.org/details/pdfy-Mv-q4qGq8_TBPcwL.

16. Catholic Church, Swiss. “ Mind Control.” Mind Control. Accessed November 20, 2022. http://kath-zdw.ch/maria/schattenmacht/mindcontrol.html.

17. Lighthouse, Richard. “Estimated Numbers: Targeted Individuals & The Terrorist watchlist.” Targeted Justice. Richard Lighthouse smashwords.com. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://www.targetedjustice.com/uploads/1/1/6/3/116323993/estimated-numbers-of-targeted-individuals.pdf.

18.  Ipso facto - Wikipedia

19. 

20. “CIA Experiments or Electromagnetic Attacks from Russia? The Mystery of 'Havana Syndrome'.” MSN. The Daily Digest. Accessed November 21, 2022. https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/other/cia-experiments-or-electromagnetic-attacks-from-russia-the-mystery-of-havana-syndrome/ss-AA14ddDc#image=26.

21.

22. Brown, Lydia X. Z. “When I Come across People Who Describe San Francisco as a Leftist/Communist Nightmare, I Just Laugh.San Francisco Is a Right-Wing Technocratic Dystopian Nightmare with a Veneer of Superficial Progressivism Not so Thinly Veiling Far-Right, Ultra-Capitalist Social Darwinism.” Twitter. Twitter, December 27, 2019.

https://twitter.com/autistichoya/status/1210697648715575298

.

 23. Carlson, Tucker. “Tucker Carlson: Source Says Yes, the CIA Was Involved in JFK’s Assassination | Fox News Video.” Fox News. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6317311778112.

Chapter 6

Tactics and Possible Reasons For Their Use.

 In her book Battle For Your Brain, Nita A Farahany states that surveillance of brain activity will lead to a society that is more conformist. Farahany states:

 "Government surveillance of brain activity will inevitably push us toward greater conformity. With greater conformity comes a passive acceptance of authority and authoritarianism, either out of fear or in hopes of appearing cooperative, even when that conflicts with one's own moral compass. Children are particularly susceptible to pressure to conform and so are even likelier to try to redirect divergent thinking for fear of being ostracized. Many of the worst atrocities are "crimes of obedience"; acts carried out in response to orders from authority that violate legal and social norms."

I have found that this conformity is a desire of those targeting me with brain control experimentation. I have searched for political organizations to involve myself with, but I quickly found out that TIs are being actively singled out to prevent them from fruitful involvement in civic engagement or participating in political organizing. This fear of ostracism is a defining characteristic of American society due to the tactic of community mobbing and mind reading. Activist circles are no different. There is no acknowledgement of the greater practice attempting to control society. If you cannot talk openly and freely acknowledge the reality of thought control or brain control and psychological operations, I don't see how you can organize or humanly participate in political organizations.  Society is more or less a phony, fascist place and social media is more or less an inadequate yet a type of refuge from the govt control grid and thought control grid as poor as it is and still a place where the behavior still exists. I used twitter for a time and now substack with virtually no following, I know that it provides a false sense of community and security. Very few people acknowledge or directly talk to you. I get great humor, insight and knowledge as well as platform for creative expression, but it takes time away from other endeavors. However, when all other endeavors are part of Big Brother, Twitter became a net benefit for a time. When musk took over it got crazy and violent so I left. It wasn’t for me.

  I thought surely people like anticivilization activist and Deep Green Resistance leader, Derrick Jensen, who discusses a culture of control, seemingly, as though he was in opposition, would be by now be acknowledging this system, but sadly not. There are some people involved , like Iran-Contra and Operation Phoenix investigator Bill Taylor, and all the whistlelowers at Bigger than Snowden, but for the most part, nobody finks on the program. They either are unaware it exists and think you are a nut, believe in the control, which is scary to think or they are all too afraid to. Perhaps this is because of the assassinations of targets and others.

Assassination Traps: 

I was the target of one such assassination attempt in 2011, but due to the manipulation of society with psyops im not sure if it was an elaborate threat or stunt. As I stated before, in September of 2009, I joined an Americorps program with a non-profit that builds houses in San Diego. I was recruited into the program by a co-worker at a previous job. Previous to joining the Americorps program in San Diego, as stated, I was very interested in the Guatemalan Genocide and Universal Jurisdiction. At my Americorps program, I ended up working on a project sponsored by Luis Palau, who had been closely associated with The Guatemalan Genocidal Dictator Efrain Rios Montt. In May or June of 2010, I began being stalked in public places by people and started receiving threats in seemingly random incongruous incidents throughout the rest of that year through 2010. In July of 2010, I was approached at a train station by a guy who indicated that he knew everything I was doing, who I was meeting, where I was going etc. He, subsequently, stated that someone should assassinate Arnold Schwarzenegger and Barak Obama. I figured he was some sort of law enforcement. I contemplated contacting the Secret Service. I texted a message to others and was persuaded not to contact the Secret Service. I figured that since they spy on everyone, that they read my text in the event that the guy wasn't law enforcement. A few months later, someone tried to assassinate me. In August of 2010, I spoke with a journalist named Katherine Hughes about an incident which occurred during my Americorps program. I divulged that the non-profit house building organization I worked for in San Diego had discriminated against a Muslim family. 

I engaged in protests throughout 2010 and 2011. In April of 2011, I engaged in a protest against the Libyan bombings sponsored by the group ANSWER. A few days later, in April of 2011, I was threatened by two women who identified themselves as police officers. I was at a Starbucks in San Fernando reading a book called Unveiling Traditions by Author Anour Majid and they sat down next to me and engaged in directed conversation. They began talking to harass me and threatened that they "fuck people up" when they arrest them and that they "fuck people up when they least suspect it." They kept talking about people "crossing the line." They sat next to me for a few hours. A few days later, I was attacked on the highway in what appeared to be a staged car accident. A woman in a car next to me pulled alongside of me and maintained identical speed with me for 5-10 seconds and then swerved into my lane spinning out of control. 

For the next 8 years, I refrained from driving and had cars synchronize going past my house at my exact exit. By September of 2011 I went to San Francisco and on the way home was recipient of another staged car accident and threat on the highway. In October of 2011, I participated in Occupy Los Angeles for 40 days or so. During one of the days' staged protest at Bank of America, I witnessed a plainclothed 'protester' signal with his hand while standing next to me. He signaled to the police officer on the gun to target me in their final assault on the protesters that were encircled there. The police officer began making eye contact with me and making intimidating faces indicating he was going to target me and laughed that I was aware of their conspiracy. Just a few weeks earlier, a veteran had been shot in the head with a rubber bullet and it fractured his skull. I left Occupy Los Angeles and while on the train I was approached through directed conversation by a woman. She said I should 'work with the police.' I went to the LAPD seeking investigation into the protest incident and never heard back. It was at this point that the v2k attacks began, as well as directed energy and gangstalking intensified. This was in January of 2012 and has continued til today. I could go into the gangstalking tactics and voice to skull and directed energy but it is rather long and maybe it will be detailed. 

 In the book War Against the Weak, Edwin Black points out how “Final Solution” was terminology used in 1925 to describe eugenics in America to save white supremacy. This would seem to predate Nazi usage. I'm quite sure there is more to the not really often, if ever, acknowledged historically shared lingo between American Eugenicists in the 1920s and Adolf Hitler usage in 1941 as head of Germany. There is much information about Operation Paperclip in which the narrative is told that America brought Nazi's to the United States after the war, but personally I think the information we have which demonstrates American Industrialists were funding the Nazi rise to power in the 20s and 30's indicates that there was likely organizational ties between America and German Nazis and I think it remains to be determined, in my mind at least, where the organizational center of the Nazi movement was or its true origins. I think that where there is funding from highly politically organized and involved industrialists and wealthy people, that there is likely organization. I don't think it is like a thing where rich people just throw their money around without being involved organizationally. So "Final Solution" was an American Eugenic term that predates Hitler's 1941 usage in Germany. Perhaps it is an indicator of organizational ties or that they surfaced in a couple of documented public ways.

WIlliam Dodd, Ambassador to Germany during the 1930's described perhaps a larger organization incorporating Nazis or a larger Nazi organization. He stated:

 "A clique of US industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. … Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there."

Allen Dulles who was Director of the CIA during the Cold War was involved in financing Nazis in the lead up to World War II and their rise to power in Germany. If, as I believe, that where there's financing, there's organization, it's important to note that Assassinations were used as a method to obtain power in Germany. Of course, Dulles used this method around the world. There have been organized hits on our own government and citizens and the prevalence of Nazi financiers at the helm of state caused people to suggest fascist organizing as being behind these hits.

As stated earlier where there’s duplicity and manipulation one must ask how deep does the duplicity and manipulation go? It seems like Israel and Nazis have been in cooperation for sometime in today’s world. Don’t know if they are false flag fronts to paint Jews and Blondes a certain way or Aryans a certain way or socialism etc.

 Some examples or other tactics besides assassination used in Security Services Stalking and Remote Neural Monitoring:

Directed Conversation:

 I have previously mentioned Directed Conversation that was used to threaten me by police officers previous to an assassination attempt, as well as used by police officers trying to get me to "work with the police," after spotting plainclothed occupy protestors communicate covertly with police officers. I'm not sure where I found this definition of directed conversation. I can no longer locate it. I found it online but I thought it was a good definition:

Directed Conversation “Has been defined as referring to a stalking tactic using stranger’s conversation to both intimidate and convey to the victim that they are under surveillance. During Directed Conversations, two or more stalkers will approach near to the target and engage in “normal” conversation with one another. The conversation is purposely made at a level so that the victim can adequately hear what is being said. During Directed conversation, personal information concerning the victim is inserted into the speech and emphasized by the stalkers in a fashion that most non-victims would not be able to discern as harassment. The purpose of Directed Conversation is to harass a victim as well as make the victim appear mentally unstable should they attempt to complain about the abuse.” (58) 

I described torture tactics used on me earlier in the book. I will briefly remind the reader of some of them here.:

Neuroweapons:

 But additionally, one of the things the security services have done to me is used what the military calls v2k or "voice to skull"  technology. V2k is a term that describes a technology which beams voices into a target's head so that they hear voices in their head. For a long while, my voices were very abusive and would degrade me when I came into contact with women, for example, and pressure me not to eat during meals. At one point, the Monarch controllers told me via v2k that they were going to burn a hole through my heart and I receive chest pain near the heart or in the heart very frequently. There was a TI on twitter who aptly described this process of not knowing what is happening to your body and what is a real health concern versus what is being caused by remote weapon to mimic or make you think you have a health concern. They said that it was a form of torture to have your body mutilated and not know what was happening. I agree with this.

 Sometimes you get the report on what is happening to you. Another thing that I believe the security services have done to me is cause me brain damage with zaps to the brain or electronic shocks to the brain, both as I'm sleeping causing paralyses and while awake. During one of my trips to the hospital, in this case it was mental health trip, I was tested and the doctor told me that I had brain damage. In fact, he told me that a section of my brain resembled that of an 80 year old man. Mind you I was 27 years old at the time.

Sensitization

Mark M Rich, a Targeted Individual and author of New World War has probably the most understandable description of the way Targted Individuals are sensitized during their 'surveillance.' He has both a great website and book called New World War. The Website is titled www.newworldwar.org.

I will describe an example of the way the security services sensitized me to a specific form of their harassment. A number of years ago, the DARPA voices kept telling me to "polish yourself" referring to me as a thing to polish that they owned. Then they would synchronize people coming out of their house polishing their cars or wiping their windows with each section of the car designating a section of my body. At the time, I was very thin, but always felt overweight and was obsessing because my handlers were constantly harassing me. The day I wrote this paragraph, they had doppelgangers polishing or wiping the front of their cars to harass me because I felt positive about losing 15 lbs. So, they wanted to remind me of my previous mindset as well as to reinforce their ownership.

Health Policing and Environmental Control

This American spy network gangstalk me and harass me based on the efficiency of my diet and exercise. They 'reward' me when I'm 'good' and punish me when I'm 'bad by completely controlling my environment through media and community mobbing and giving me negative and positive stimuli. They do this with speech also. They are collecting all brain activity and thoughts, then analyzing how to implant artificial dreams to reward and punish for speech and behavior. Dreams are deeply related to our psychological health and harassment dreams architected by psych warriors can do damage when they want to. In recent years my dreams became more artistic and pleasant or psychologically enhancing, but for a number of years it was in fact very detrimental to my mental health, so like I say, I don't know if there was new leadership or something at some point.

While I write this book with an overarching message that these people are like a gestapo. Sometimes I feel like with regards to this aspect of the targeting like a more general overbearing health police. I would say that people can judge for themselves, but I can't actually reveal everything or make accusations about all the ways they control my health. Most of this book is about political surveillance, technology in society and psychological operations. And if you just take judgement out of it and political attributions then I could say that one thing I've experienced is an 'active surveillance' that seeks to moderate my diet exercise or drinking. It is like a bee hive influencing my health or choices. And I have to begrudgingly admit that the system has probably made me more health conscious and healthier at this moment in my life. But at some point, it was influencing me to deplete calories at an excessive level as well as caused me to sprint every day and hurt my knees. I still think that if I was left to my own devices, it is possible, I would have been healthy or healthier. I've been health conscious for a while. I think I would have avoided yoyo spikes by developing consistent habits that were more sustainable and be more confident and social without people trying to control me and likely wouldn't have the physical ailments I have with my knees.

Floating Box

 Quote from Jonathan Triumphant" on Twitter

 There is a Targeted Individual who goes by the name Jonathan Triumphant on twitter. This is a quote from his page that I copied before writing this book:

TI’s are subjected to vehicular stalking daily. “The floating box” is one of the terms used to describe surrounding the targets vehicle and boxing them in. Often perps will try to scare targets and force them into accidents. This form of harassment endangers everyone’s lives.

Commercials Harassing Targets.

Targets report of personalized harassment via commercials. Upon writing this book I paused and realized that my ordeal began to take shape in an undoubted way in 2009. I was 10 years younger. I thought to myself that these bastards took the most prime years of my life. Subsequently to having this thought, I walked to the kitchen and an Amazon Prime truck zoomed by my house and on tv a commercial talking about bags under your eyes came on and stated "look ten years younger." This was followed by a switch to Fox News and a report that Jeff Bezos (the owner of Amazon) was working with Lockheed Martin to travel to the moon. Just a small snippet into 2 minutes of media feedback via commercial on tv and billboards on vehicles stalking you. Lockheed Martin of course is identified by many targets and whistle blowers as being responsible for carrying out the security services stalking.

Additional Possible reasons for targeting:

Ho Hum Humpty Dumpty VS Power's True Face. A Desire to destroy Civil Liberties

In Naomi Klein's book, Shock Doctrine, she spells out how government officials utilize disasters deliberately to achieve policy objectives with intention.

There has been much rhetoric during the Trump years about "the most corrupt President in history" and this rhetoric brushes aside serious corruption throughout our history and ongoing corruption that is bipartisan well beyond Trump. For example, Presidents have been selling out the people's civil liberties to corporations and authoritarian bureaucrats for over a century. Surrogates for these figures and the two main political parties try to paint this as accidental or like the Humpty Dumpty Trope. This accidental explanation of history I believe paints a false narrative of do gooder types in positions of power. And while I don't want to simplify things I think this is a very simplistic view.

 Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News contributor, actually argues that Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt accidentally destroyed constitutional freedoms rather than deliberately. There are many angles a person could approach these presidents and find credence in the claim of subversion of constitutional freedom, as well as find other major faults in eTheodore Roosevelt’s eugenics support and Woodrow Wilson’s ku klux Klan support. Napolitano is on the 'right' which might make the claim of accidental actions appear partial and thus more legitimate than a claim of deliberate actions. More recently and closer to the advent of Trump was during the Obama years, the term "gangster" was used as a term of endearment to describe the president after bombing Libya and killing the head of state, focusing people's attention on how inexpensive the invasion of Libya was. There should have been hearings on the use of depleted Uranium in Libya. Instead, we heard about Hillary Clinton's emails. This was all a misdirection. In addition to these obfuscations of Democratic criminality, there is the narrative sold that the Republican Party has become something foreign to it’s previous form. You could probably write a book titled, Crazy Things Republicans Said and Did Before Trump. For starters: Richard Baker, Republican Congressman from Baton Rouge, told a group of Lobbyists after Hurricane Katrina that "We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn't do it, but God did." (59) This revelation of desire to literally decimate poor people of color's neighborhood through apparent natural disaster demonstrates a belief in malevolence against some, ordained by God, in order for a vision or benefit of others.

As another example of this tweaked thought process and, in this case, documented behavior by people in positions of power, I submit former President Richard Nixon and the development of the Drug War.  I don't believe that Nixon represents an aberration in gov't institutions. He crafted the drug war and laws with racist intent according to his own adviser's admission. I don’t understand why Fox and Democrats are constantly fighting over Critical Race Theory when this mountain just gets ignored? Journalist Dan Baum revealed that John Ehrlichman, a central advisor in the Nixon Whitehouse, stated that The Drug War was designed to go after black people and antiwar people to disrupt their community building and political strength. (59B) This racist and political motive is likely just a revelation of how government institutions function throughout history behind the scenes. Nixon is not an aberration in my mind, but a revelation of power's true face.

 Generational targeting

 With these recent public acknowledgements of criminal and immoral oppressive intent behind leaders of the government, the question of why rather than if, these criminals select specific targets and devote time, energy and resources to harassing and mutilating them or just controlling their minds enters into discussion and is often asked. 

One reason often given for being selected as a target is the assertion that the Monarch or MK Ultra program was based on transgenerational warfare. Many people believe rightly or wrongly that they are subject to bloodlines that are targeted by some powerful elites. I don’t know what to think about this. It could be that the issue is complex regarding this issue. It could be that you are in some sort of monitoring program which can be catalyzed by blood or ancestry and then when you do something in your life that challenges the group in charge of the program they have reason and a system to clamp down and engage with you. In my case, I’ve pondered that something could be afoot with regards to this. Afterall, monarchies, religious and other political organizations have fought transgenerationally for millennia. I have found some common thread with one Targeted Individual who said that her mother worked for Hughes Aircraft, a company started by the famous Howard Hughes. Howard Hughes actually heard voices and was diagnosed with Schizophrenia. My grandpa worked at Hughes as well. Hughes was eventually bought out by Lockheed Martin, a company that has been identified by whistle blowers as running the gangstalking program through gov’t contracts and allegedly they do it through Fusion Centers. Additional family history, which I pondered may be relevant to a possible transgenerational warfare aspect, is that according to a cousin, I am related to a friend or associate of anarchist Michail Bachunin, Saverio Friscia. In his writings, Bachunin discussed government experiments in the late 19^th century.

Chapter 7

Political Thoughts or Speech which may have gotten me targeted Part 1 

Human rights victims, Targeted Individuals, often times are unsure of why they have been targeted. I've discussed earlier how the FBI engages in political surveillance. Additionally, some targets could be targeted for being whistleblowers or because they belong or are perceived to belong to groups that are targeted by the state and its minions.  In some cases, it could be because the target has done something to challenge established criminals or elite in society who don't want something immoral or unethical to be challenged. In my case, I believe it is related to political speech or to political thought. I believe I have had my mind read for decades along with the general population.

 5 Small possible political speech or thoughts that caused my targeting: 

• At a younger age I would often get lost in thought about hidden motives of people controlling political systems or hidden structures and organizations. I theorized that there are fraternities who surround monarchs and control them until they kill them throughout history. I then got surrounded and controlled for political reasons, so the theory, whether correct or not drew interest from the government, perhaps even from monarchs.

•  Around time of the Arab Spring, I made a collage that depicted the earth enveloped in the Roman Coliseum with the wars being conducted like Gladiator spectacles for consumption and with a cult hierarchy that supersedes heads of government but includes them. And I depicted an unarmed Iraqi who was snipered in one of the pictures with people watching it all like a Roman audience screaming for blood lust. 

• In recent years Beto O’Rourke stated a major reason to endorse Biden was to fight for democracy around world. In College, I wrote a paper about how in the enlightenment there was an element of evangelism. That’s why we kill people for a cause in the West. Why people do it in other civilizations I'm not privy to other than justice and revenge though I'm sure cause is obviously an issue.

• When I was in College in a Journalism class, I wrote an essay or article about a major cultural problem in society, which was the way society builds up and tears down celebrities in almost ritual fashion and acts like they have ownership of them. I got a C and the professor said it wasn't a significant or major problem in society. Exposure of Mind control operations would present an additional predicament for this grade. (seems like I’m smarting over the grade, more just on the idea being taken seriously).

• In The Ancient Aliens Epsiode titled Beyond Roswell, guest experts asserted that The Cold War was a ruse or a smokescreen of some kind to excuse the development and work in tandem regarding UFO reverse engineering. I had this thought before, independent of this show, some decade ago or more and I've expressed in this book some notion of that regarding the wars in Ukraine and Iraq. But I don't know. I definitely think there is an order inherent in wars heaped upon people and find it highly suspicious that Russia and the United States largely ruled over the earth in the 20th century fighting wars in other people's countries. So, if we called UFOs actually spaceships coming in and out of the atmosphere with technology and at speeds beyond public disclosure, then there’s some space faring colonization well beyond what Elon musk intends to do publicly with SpaceX. There was a CIA agent in the 70s or 80s who theorized that UFOs were time traveling entities. Perhaps that is the case, but with an apparent high technology at play one wonders where do the people operating these get their money? With an apparent disclosure that there was going to be some massive Psyop in Ukraine with fake corpses, explosions, victims and mourners, I ask is it possible to conduct a massive series of these incidents? Also is it possible to have a war where the cabal or leaders of countries don't strike to eliminate each other but target selected military and civilian personnel in each other's organizations, while hiding funds for what people call a "breakaway civilization?" A real war could also serve to that end as well. The war could possibly showcase lower tech and contribute to the illusion held before the audience, with the citizens of countries who are not in the know of what takes place with blackops etc. So are they planning on letting us wither away on earth killing it as wage slaves competing against each other and bombing each other to death over water land and oil?

The rest of this Book is additional thoughts I've had that possibly was a reason for being targeted:

In 2010, around the time I began being threatened and overtly harassed in public, I was connecting dots of global erasure of events by other news stories, knocking unflattering events for the elite out of the news cycle. One story I found funny was the African dictator Charles Taylor’s trial. The law suit over the "Ground Zero Mosque" by The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) happened simultaneous to the Naomi Campbell testimony in the Charles Taylor case. If you don't recall, plans to build a 100 million dollar Mosque near or at Ground Zero became public and was sensationalized by political leaders and the media. In the Charles Taylor case, during cross examination by a former Air Force Colonel, Taylor had months previously identified ACLJ founder, Pat Robertson, as "his man in Washington." This becomes of interest here because it was Pat Robertson’s organization which stoked the Ground Zero Mosque controversy in the news which dwarfed Taylor’s revelation. Taylor revealed that he granted Robertson permission to mine gold in Liberia, as reported by ABC News:  

“Prosecutors at the human rights trial of former Liberian warlord Charles Taylor alleged Thursday that Christian televangelist Pat Robertson had lobbied the White House on Taylor's behalf in return for a gold mining contract.

 The controversial pastor and former Republican presidential contender met with then-President George W. Bush on Taylor's behalf, prosecutors charged during cross-examination of Taylor in a Dutch courtroom, allegedly in return for a contract to mine gold in southeast Liberia -- a contract they say that Taylor had no legal right to grant. “ (60)

I opined at the time that following mining money would be a rather interesting ordeal. One place following mining money would lead would be to the very weapon systems used to kill and torture targeted individual human rights victims as well as to the major weapons industry that kills all over the world. Much of the high tech weaponry used by industrialized and developed nations is made up of minerals mined all over the world. Looking into mining is looking into the production process in the military industrial complex. I guess, in the seventies, if we would have become anti fossil fuel, then Africa would have seen more war for the renewable minerals. I don't know if the middle east would be poorer or not, but the air quality and climate would be less impacted.

 In testimony before Congress, Wayne Madsen revealed that America ran the Congo War through proxy or through what I think is an essentially African Legion with leadership trained in the United States. This testimony took place months ahead of the Twin Towers attacks on 9/11 and the subsequent War on Terror completely overshadowed the American War in Congo, which was started by illegal invasions years earlier. Months after Wayne Madsen's testimony on the American instigated War in Congo, which included illegal invasions and war crimes violations, Henry Kissinger wrote an article attacking Universal Jurisdiction. (61) Human Rights Watch describes Universal Jurisdiction as 

"the ability of the domestic judicial systems of a state to investigate and prosecute certain crimes, even if they were not committed on its territory, by one of its nationals, or against one of its nationals (i.e. a crime beyond other bases of jurisdiction, such as territoriality or active" (62)

The American Journalist Wayne Madsen had just testified that U.S personnel were implicated in war crimes in the biggest war since World War II in Africa, an implication which would see responsibility in the hands of high ranking U.S officials. Kissinger would shortly be appointed head of the 9/11 commission. His anti Universal Jurisdiction piece ran one month prior to the Twin Towers destruction. The United States, in its war on terror, would go on to terrorize people all around the world and pull out of the Geneva Conventions, an international treaty 'obliging state parties to use Universal Jurisdiction.' It also basically dismembered international law as part of it's war on terror to the point where one wonders if it wasn't a war against International law.   

I had previously been interested in how war in The Democratic Republic of Congo, a war for minerals to supply high tech weapons, which Wayne Madsen testified in Congress that American special forces initiated, resulted in the biggest war anywhere in the world since WWII and that this testimony came mere months before September 11th. So as the country was digesting new forthcoming information about how The United States was instrumental in this bloodshed in Africa, a war for minerals essential to its weaponry, it was soon redirected people to pay attention to terrorists who allegedly took down the World Trade Center and flew airplanes into the Pentagon, creating a new "just war" in the middle east. In the years since this event, the day's event, and details which surround it, spawned a huge 9/11 Truth movement coinciding with a huge War on Terror sprawled about everyone's television screens and newspapers bringing sensationalist shock after shock.

Congo is estimated to have 24 trillion dollars worth of untapped 'resources.' (63) This is more than the combined GDP of Europe and the United States. In 1996, leaders in the Democratic Party directed American personell to instigate an invasion of Congo with basically an African legion of the United States. Not only did the Democratic Party leaders in the Clinton Administration invade and kill millions of people, they also pillaged and personally profited off corrupt mining contracts while promoting an economy that is completely dependent upon their exploitation and dominance of the central African region. This behavior is identical, and in many ways even worse than the invasion of Iraq, which the Democratic Party promoted and actively participated in for decades prior to the most recent 2nd invasion. Conveniently, the shock and trauma of warfare in Iraq, obscures a possibly even more strategically significant and bigger crime in Congo or central Africa.

 I attended a protest with a sign that read "There'd be No bombing in Middle East without the bloodshed in Africa" or something along those lines.

Another potential reason for my targeting is that previous to the Haitian Earthquake of 2010 and after, I became interested in the Haitian Revolution (of 1804). In her book about the Haitian revolution, Modernity Disavowed, Professor and author Sibylle Fischer discusses the silencing of events or the replacing of one event with other events and deliberate attempts by the subordinator class or intellectual elites to mold nations, to mold the psyche of the masses. (64) Recently, in January of 2023, in an interview with Anderson Cooper, Prince Harry revealed a way of operation amongst the Royal Family of The United Kingdom. When a family member or members want to receive good press in the media, they will plant bad press for another member or somebody else as a way to receive positive spin cycle or pr campaign. This revelation by Prince Harry touches upon this basic principle that Fischer points out. That the creation or publicizing of events can mold the psyche of the masses and replace events or silence other events. 

 From 1996 - 2003 5.4 million people died in Congo. This invasion and warfare has killed, in some estimates, 10 million people. (65)  I believe this cover-up is a crime bigger than The War on Terror and the staging of 9/11, though those are huge events. As stated, the Democratic Party was and is heavily involved, but they would have people believe that they are just an incompetent party and that the two events, The War on Terror/9-11 and war in central Africa and Congo are unrelated. I started a blog and defined war as an ideological construction to compel participation and induce obedience in the maintenance and accumulation of power through murder and questioned The War on Terror as a staged propaganda event to manage political reality and to distract from the totality of warring operations in the American Empire. I attempted to point out how through deliberate crafted discourse, there is collusion of the imperial parties of America, Republican and Democrat in doing so. To be clear, war is for the purpose of propaganda. It is a cultural production. Additionally, I questioned it as a function to create chaos and terror in particular places, being deliberate punishment of nations as a demonstration of power. 

The current ongoing event or cascade of events accomplishing this task for imperial parties is the War in Ukraine and the Trump Presidency or now a potential rerun for president. The Trump presidency functioned, so as to erase past crimes or other activities by past presidents. The drumbeat surrounding his presidency was one of begging for the Bush or Obama years. Even I fall for this trap from time to time thinking that while it was bad that Obama was so worshipped you couldn't criticize him, at least he was respected and the office of president was respected to the point one could imagine changing reality through democracy. Trump trashed that whole notion. Yet still we have to see that the whole country seems to have collective amnesia and cannot remember the crimes and misdeeds of previous presidential administrations nor ongoing crimes started by them. For instance, many professional sports teams found the courage to challenge presidential prestige and maybe rightfully so in the face of Trump's tactics. Numerous championship teams denied invitations to the White House to celebrate with President Trump. The stand is largely seen as righteous. Yet this stand against Trump has me wonder when a Democrat murders millions or thousands of people, will teams forgo going to the White House for their championships for those atrocities? If not, what is the purpose of forgoing Trump, if not to lend normalcy and endorsement of those atrocities or future ones by a different party or administration? If someone in your family became a terrorist or was deemed a terrorist, Donald Trump says he would kill you. I personally think Trump says things to make other people look moderate. In this case, it should be noted that the United States has been acting out his proposition. Previous to the Trump Presidency, Muammar Ghadaffi, former head of the state of Libya, had his toddler killed in an air strike, seemingly a message to leaders around the world that their families were fair game. 

The United States is responsible for nearly 15 million deaths between Iraq Afghanistan and Congo since 1990. (66) The Bushes' poll numbers indicate tiny political accountability for their part, but the Clintons seem to be unscathed by the Congo and, for that matter, Iraq because there's not U.S deaths for their operations. Hillary Clinton won the Democratic party with little to no mention of the Iraq sanctions, bombings, war and war in The Congo and even won the popular vote in the General Election. 

Perhaps the most significant time of the most recent administration previous to Trump, the Obama Administration, was the time during the Egyptian Revolution to the Libyan and Syrian wars. This time was coined as all part of the Arab Spring. There has been much talk about how the Arab Spring was utilized to justify American Intervention in Libya and Syria. One thing that struck me during those days of revolution and then war was the stark contrast in imagery from the subsequent events, revolution then war. During the revolution there was imagery of regular people engaging in intellectual discussion and largely peacefully assembling. During these days it was interesting that women were present. I found that tropes about the middle east were being upended at least for a few days. This soon was replaced with imagery of violence, racism and bloodshed once weapons started pouring into Libya. In these images, the violent male dominated the day.  The question I had about these images was whether or not they were controlled or deliberate. As any Targeted Individual will tell you, the psychological operations connected to what is some continuance of the MK Ultra program attempt to control the psyche of the masses, just like Sybille Fischer spells out in her book about the Hatian Revolution. In fact I found the common theme presented far and wide from military officials and other intellectuals describing the revolution then ensuing war along the lines of "developing" middle east to be suspicious. To me, it was as if the cultural production of the war was being presented as a contrast between the elite warriors of the Pentagon by officials, often white, in medal award lined coats and uniforms positioning themselves as further evolved technologically, refined and just generally more advanced than the warriors they directed in the Middle East. Many of these officials would appear in peaceful comedy studios like Stephen Colbert show or Jon Stewart show and crack jokes about chaos of those violent warrior developers in the middle east comparing them to the United States development in the 1700s, 200 years earlier. 

Walter Lippman, who is considered the Father of Modern Journalism, coined the phrase stereotype. Lippman's stereotype, the "picture in our heads," a weapon of mass communication in social conflict and management, provides pillars of unexamined certainties (67) in the onslaught of atrocity justification and wars heaped upon the public, conducted in terrain of lessened repellence. The imagery coming through during the Egyptian Revolution was a breath of fresh air for much of the American population. An autocratic dictator was being challenged by democratic activists. This imagery was seemingly used to sell a war to the American Public which thwarted many of the masses' desired elements of the revolution.

Shortly after the first days of the Egyptian revolution, James Baker and Henry Kissinger talked in opeds of pragmatic idealism, a concept of French philosophy during Napoleon era of re-domination of Haiti, and the New York Times editorial board broadcasted calls for President Obama to use A10 aircraft which are known to be vehicles for the usage of Depleted Uranium. (68)  Pictures distributed by the Telegraph in which Arab men held captive black migrants accused of being mercenaries became the hallmark mental producing image of the 'war' declared in the midst of a revolution in Egypt filled with factory strikes. (69) 

I'll briefly pause here and say that I found the soldiers in this photo to resemble models, almost, and that I found how clean they were in a war zone to be weird in my mind. I share this to harken back on the images and articles I shared earlier about the Iraqis staging a car bomb and faking victims. In any event The Libyan war had replaced the Egyptian Revolution. And now today people are downright skeptical of disobedience to autocratic dictators in the middle east, where a heavy handed imperialism rules with divide and conquer. I found it interesting that the imagery from the Arab Spring transformed to one of factory strikes by largely Arab wage slaves living under dictatorship to that of Arab masters trading African migrants as slaves.

According to a source quoted in the Wall Street Journal, the Administration, at the very least, "knew of" weapons being shipped by The Egyptian Military across the border into Lybia "a few days" before March 17th No Fly Zone declaration. (70) I saw that the historical pattern of behavior by elite imperialists from Napolean to Baker and Kissinger was apparent in the modern decrees by the new brand ambassador of the War on Terror, President Barack Obama. To quote from Marinetti's 1909 Futurist Manifesto

...Beauty exists only in struggle. There is no masterpiece that has not an aggressive character. Poetry must be a violent assault on the forces of the unknown, to force them to bow before man. We are on the extreme promontory of the centuries! What is the use of looking behind at the moment when we must open the mysterious shutters of the impossible? Time and Space died yesterday. We are already living in the absolute, since we have already created eternal, omnipresent speed. We want to glorify war — the only cure for the world — militarism, patriotism... (71)

 Apparently, I was correct about noticing a pattern of behavior in imperialist elites because the push for war through no fly zones as well as Kissinger-esque tactics around the world including Operation Phoenix, which Marshal Thomas describes as the model for the Targeted Individual program, were championed a few years later for more war in Syria by former State Department and Defense Department official, Robert Caruso who wrote in the Huffington Post that

Henry Kissinger’s strategies in Laos and Chile are also a model of success that should be emulated, not criticized. Critical to advancing American foreign policy will be an acceptance that reinventing the wheel should give way to duplicating past successes of Operations PHOENIX, NOBLE ANVIL, AMBER FOX, CELESTIAL BALANCE, and JUNIPER SHIELD.

The proven synergy of special operations forces working in concert with the interagency, particularly but not exclusively the intelligence community, should be built upon significantly. (72)

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fortune-favors-the-bold_b_12200132

 Caruso also prefaced his push for Operation Phoenix with the sober assessment that "our security commitments require sustained involvement abroad for centuries." So, the fact that a state department and defense department official admits that imperial tactics are emulated or that they repeat themselves through contemporary times and for centuries at a time, has me wonder if the thought that there isn’t some ancient playbook being passed down to pacify the masses isn't correct. This is a pondering shared by many I’m sure.

Obama and General Friedrich Van Bernardh set to Win the Future through world war?

This idea of an ancient playbook presented itself in a pattern seen in President Obama's 2011 state of the union address in which like all U.S presidents he pitted the U.S against the world as a competitor. But what struck me additionally was how he was using the phrase "Win The Future." 

An innocuous phrase you might say until you realize that 100 years earlier, European Generals called for “winning glorious futures”, using those exact words, conducted racist propaganda campaigns for imperial incursions, continued to murder 10s of millions, created free trade charters, while directly ruling and indirectly ruling people in lands that would become today's Nations. Above is a propaganda picture from 1911 when Italy dropped the first bomb ever by hand on top of other people's heads in Tripoli during a 1911 bombing campaign. The campaign came at an immediate and long term cost to those it was waged on, and additionally to the poor in the South of Italy as well. The products used for Imperial campaigns of the past, even those of the decade prior were rendered obsolete and in a matter of decades the flesh of tens of millions more would be rendered obsolete through the world wars and the rest of the 20th century. 

 The revolution in Egypt and subsequent war in Libya hit following President Obama’s Imperial gauntlet, laid down during The 2011 State of The Union. In it, he declared unspecified but ever-existing worldwide threats, a new binary opponent in the people of China, provided fresh legs for atrocity justification and channeling either through internal sabotage or straight out lunacy, the German General Friedrich Van Bernardhi circa 1911 who after discussing Germany’s colonial problem in Morroco, prefaced his assertions that war was biologically necessary stating:

Our Science, our literature, and warlike achievements of our past have made me proudly conscious of belonging to a great civilized nation which in spite of all weakness of bygone days, must, and assuredly will, win a glorious future. (73)

Additionally, President Obama's assertion of winning the future came just one month after his December 5th surprise appearance at Bagram Airforce base in Afghanistan where he claimed excitement at hearing the playing of Manifest Destiny and nuts on stage with General David Patreus. Obama is quoted as saying on stage: 

To Chief Thomas Hager and to the commander and conductor. I gather we had a couple of other bands playing, Manifest Destiny and Nuts. I don't know about, you know -- I don't know how they sounded. What did you think? Were they pretty good? (Hooah!) (74)

 One day later, an ABC News' segment featuring General David Patreaus titled "Can We Win," Diane Sawyer declared 62 percent of Afghan residents supported U.S Troops and claimed that in 2006 78 percent of residents in Afghanistan supported the presence of U.S Troops. In the "Can We Win" Charade, Petraeus speaking with George Stephanopoulos declared that the Afghan Nation was inherently corrupt since its beginning. (75) A few short months later, photographs appeared in Rolling Stone of U.S soldiers dismembering Afghans they had killed and posing for pictures as Trophy kills. Afghan activist and former MP who was kicked out of the Afghan Parliament for criticizing NATO, Fundamentalists and Warlords, Malalai Joya wrote in the Gaurdian: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/30/kill-team-photos-afghanistan-us

 I must report that Afghans do not believe this to be a story of a few rogue soldiers. We believe that the brutal actions of these "kill teams" reveal the aggression and racism which is part and parcel of the entire military occupation. While these photos are new, the murder of innocents is not. Such crimes have sparked many protests in Afghanistan and have sharply raised anti-American sentiment among ordinary Afghans. (76)

Joya was later denied Visa when she attempted to tour the U.S and speak in public with Noam Chomsky about the particular political education, which the people of Afghanistan have gathered over hundreds of years, particularly the past decades of her life. Joya often discusses the dual pronged attack, through War, on people in Afghanistan propagated in name of fighting manufactured enemies. She has really added to thoughts set in motion by many for some time questioning the Order inherent in "Wars" heaped upon peoples in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Congo, Haiti, Iraq etc. Funny that very few complained when the Obama administration denied Joya visa, yet a few years later everyone had forgotten all about the deed. (something was funny to me i need to tie that in***) Trump?

One can see parallels between the U.S "winning the west" or "How the west was won" and Afghanistan war propaganda, as well as 18th and 19th century colonialism. Real thematic and tactical parallels were witnessed by the fact that the U.S named the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden a mere 2 months later, "Operation Geronimo." The Killing of Osama Bin Laden has spurred many questions regarding his ability to evade capture conduct terrorist operations for so long and then ultimately through death to evade trial.

Osama Bin Laden could not have evaded satellite technology used in the Monarch program that uses brain frequency to track everyone's movement. There is legitimate question over whether or not Osama even carried out the World Trade Center Attacks independent of government help. There is no way with the technology that the government possesses that Osam Bin Laden and the hijackers evaded security forces in the U.S to carry out those attacks. There are two main schools of thought regarding the September 11th attacks. LIHOP (that the government "let it happen on purpose" and MIHOP that the gov't "made it happen on purpose." I believe MIHOP. Once you acknowledge that the Monarch Program tech means that OBL's whereabouts and WTC Attack was known about then his May 1st alleged killing was planned for May 1st for political significance of the date. And once you see purpose and pattern of Monarch program assassinating activist whistleblowers or people with a common profile, Obama issued a sort of extra judicial pogrom call by staging killing on May 1st. This was followed by the rollout a few years later of Robert Caruso publicly condoning and calling to rekindle Operation Phoenix, an assassination campaign of suspected communists during the Vietnam war, which Monarch Program author Marshal Thomas believes was the predecessor of Monarch mind control targeting program. In fact, amidst then President Obama's presidency, it was revealed by the Investigative Journalist Wayne Madsen, that Obama's parents were involved with the CIA to identify and assassinate suspected communists in Indonesia. (76 A)

The measure of 30 years worth of atrocity heaped upon peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan, in which Osama Bin Laden, at age 22, was initiated as a consul, is inestimable. Aside from delivering the providential death blow on evil's iconic figure, held in a gift wrapped, fantastical recall of the 19th century demonization of the criminal, opium producing oriental and besides the millennial old representation of the enemy, personified as a growth, spawned from slivered satanic flesh, surreptitiously masked in evil's lair, the extrajudicial killing of Osama Bin Laden and "burial at sea" was a theatrical display of a hit on a witness to and suspect of 30 years of criminal activity. Following the President's May 1st call and the monsoon arousal at the displaying of the remnants of Operation Geronimo, in which crowds of young people, probably staged by the CIA for a photo op, Took to the streets, placard pumping CNN, chief operator in bringing about the Iraq war buildup, ran a segment in which Teach for America Head and Chief propagandist, Walter Isaacson, diagnosed Pakistan, a nation of 170 million people, with 'subnormality.' (77) This apparent killing and diagnoses of Pakistan came amidst the expansion of bombing across Africa and a NATO campaign that saw 20,000 airstrikes, or what's been called 'therapy,' carried out in Libya. The campaign was championed as success by the World Security Network, who derided the "endless diagnosis that replaces the 'therapy'" inherent in tens of thousands of NATO bombs and proxy warfare. (78)

 But once the euphoria of the Libya overthrow and assassination of Gadaffi, causing the laughter of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, passed, the powers that be seemed to allow, once again, for chaos to take hold in a country whose regime was replaced. Violence in Libya spiraled to the point of subjugating African migrants as slaves to be sold at auctions. (79). It seems that there is a prepackaged explanation for such happenings by the National Security State, that ill conceived regime changes result in unexpected chaos all as ‘miscalculation.’ Yet through all these ‘miscalculations’ money and power seem to accrue into less and less hands with masses still buttressed between polarities.

This brings us back to the Presidency of Donald Trump who came to power chastising the regime change wars in the middle east while engaging in unpopular racist and unsophisticated rhetoric making him despised around the World much like a heel in a professional wrestling company.

I guess Trump knew about the twin towers before it happened and wrote it in a book he published called The America We Deserve. (80) Its important to note that there is a long trail of published material and media which predicted the events of that day. Vice Magazine, for instance, knew exact details half a decade earlier and left a paper trail revealing preprogrammed widespread knowledge. This deliberate paper trail seems to be about revealing information to create disillusionment in the ostensible plans of 'Nation Building' and disillusionment in reversal of policies supporting dictators, meaning creating disillusionment in opposing dictators. I don't know how else to analyze deliberate revelation. It seems like an effort to provoke particular disillusionment or even redirect it.

The cartoon above appeared in a Vice Magazine article in 1994. In the article, the author asks the reader to "imagine the twin towers collapsing."(81) The fact that Vice magazine predicts Twin Towers collapsing after an Al Queda airplane attack in 1994, reveals that the government wanted the citizenry to comprehend, at a certain point, the 'truth' about the event or the lies about the event. There was a desire to reveal government involvement as evidenced by the article's 'prophecy.' The 'prophecy' reveals knowledge nearly a decade in advance.

I believe 9/11 was conducted as an intelligence test. I'm not saying that this is a rightful test of intelligence, but that it is in the minds of the architects. I see it as stupid myself, but I think the abusers see it differently. With regards to terrorism and domestic abuse, it appears to me that the official story of the Twin Towers is a deliberate fabrication with clues left behind as an intelligence test. Speculation on my part, is that this is to erode trust in institutions whether they be religious or national. A physicist and engineer, apparently, can quickly detect the false explanation being promoted. Perhaps this is a test in reason. The more you know about technology and the nature of the world the less the official scenario appears credible. Some of the Occult societies are allegedly based in an affinity for reason over superstition and faith. I think that's how they see it.

If you recognize terrorist attacks as false flags and the 'solutions' offered by the government is to restrict freedom, then the reason for the attacks is probably a disdain for freedom. Of course, there could be an attempt to create a discourse discussing this, in which they take rights away, so you don't ask for more than what you had lost. Freedom for most in America is the opportunity to work at a job that disrespects you, underpays you in order that you may pay to live in a house you are either in debt for or renting at extraordinary cost. On top of this is the system I described in the 1st 5 chapters of this book utilizing brain control Artificial Intelligence, mind reading, gangstalking and Directed Energy Weapons assaults. We call this freedom.

An original purpose of a calendar was for the reckoning of debts. Reckon is a computation. Additionally, you could say, as well, that calendars are to signify dates of social importance. On such a planet as this, dates of social importance can be markers of power as power is of utmost social importance. Humans base constructions of all kinds, whether they be material or something like systems of organization, often times, on existing forms or base them on forms of or what garners significance in their brain. One can look to the 2011 presentation of a newly sanctified killing arena in Libya occurring amidst 8 year anniversary of shock and awe for examples of what could easily be construed as a commemoration.

 Current state of the country is somewhat a hopeless situation in which we live in a totally new age fascist society in which the left and right uses the mob, corporations and the state to cudgel people. It is a tyrannical government assassinating its own citizens and engaging in state sponsored trafficking with people responsible like Jeff Epstein being murdered while in state custody or faking their death. People are being thrown in jail for being sick when they are lucky enough to receive care and not die because of the lack of care and then become indebted because of it. People are being thrown in jail for being in debt after trying to become educated. We are in never ending anti-terror wars which devolve into out right genocidal campaigns like in Yemen. 500,000 people are homeless.

America is a big cult. Unfettered Capitalism is a big cult. We are always trying to produce for profits, be productive all the time and 1/5 get weeded out from society. What we need to produce is housing, food, clothing, medicine, transportation, waste cleaning and education. Everything else like art for instance and entertainment should probably come from inspirational bursts. But everyone is forced to produce for profit for survival and rearrange their life to fit production. We quite literally are becoming machines.

Immigration:

Growing up, I never understood the calls for assimilation into America. I always thought that something was missing as you lose connection to your roots. I am a 3rd generation American, at least I think I have that right. My grandpa immigrated to America at age 18 from Sicily and my grandma was daughter of Italian immigrants. She was born in New York. On my Scottish/ Irish side, my family came some time after the civil war. My Irish ancestors came over on a ship called the Ethiopia in 1877, in fact on April 11th, which is my birthday. I don't know all the dates by heart. Anyways, there was a lot of talk surrounding Immigration during the Trump Presidency and campaign for President. I am all for the 14th Amendment in which people born here are citizens. I think if America could overlook nazi war criminals and include them in the U.S Intelligence structure that we could overlook illegal immigration and grant the undocumented citizenship when most of their "crimes" consist of scrubbing our floors or whatnot. However, I don't think that is enough to deal with the problems presented to us through the global system's fallibility.

 I think that political integration between nations can work to solve the problem of a hierarchy of nationalities throughout the world, and particularly in America. There are people who don't even enjoy the status of refugee or legalized immigrant status in America or in other countries also. This has the effect of creating a permanent underclass throughout the world where people don't have rights and can be exploited. Look for instance at non-citizens workers working the food supply in America. These people are basically making the economy go, but should we really rely on exploitation to run an economy? Should politicians be boasting about this as leaders of countries? These people should have all the benefits of citizenship and protections supplied with it. I don't understand why average working-class people in this country (America) aren't for raising the status of those in the underclass of America. By allowing people to be exploited we are actually demeaning our own standing in the economy and on the political front. Most importantly though is that it is just plain awful and wrong to run your economy on the backs of exploited people, just as slavery was.

It feels like there is an effort to create inflation so that people won't support ending the slave like status of farm workers or food production workers as an example. Throughout the 2022 election season, inflation ran high. The day after the 2022 election ended, there were headlines that ran saying that Inflation was "cooling." It was almost as if we had just been extorted by some organization controlling the economy. 

If there really is a latent benevolence to the Constitution, then we really need to heed the call to eliminate the underclass status of non-citizens. And this is just a start. Once you go down that road, the glaring evil of exploitation in the American empire presents itself. So I'd say people should not be in cages, which they shouldn't, but they should be moving freely and equally. I agree with Libertarians that borders should be open, but recognize that probably Libertarians are connected to monied interest or industrial interest that would like a surplus labor pool in the U.S, which is why im for international integrated citizenship rather than just work visas. I think that in global system where Corporations, American Military and rich people surpass boundaries and borders, that poor people and average people should have access to the wealth that was often extracted from their countries and resides in America.

I had a conversation in college that I vaguely remember with an anti illegal immigration proponent in which I stated that immigrants were basically invited into the country do to the fact that the walls just push people into the desert but let them in. The point I was making is that people shouldn't be penalized for doing what society wants them to do and should be given citizenship. I was responding to rhetoric which claimed people snuck into the country. This conversation is some basis for a counterintelligence harassment and what the Trump FBI conspiracy is based on. The anti illegal immigration proponent I had that conversation with later became a police officer and now I get misrepresented in media as Donald Trump , Steve King and Ralph Northam as a war on my identity, which is a human right violation.

The border is a reflection of the world and the crisis is poverty and global empire. It's not an "immigration problem" in U.S along southern border it is an economic and empire problem. People's needs are not being met by the global economic and political system and rather a global civilizational problem. For many, the land that was theirs is now under this domain in a system which always sought to exploit and subdue the rather than include equally. The media loves to point out when someone immigrates from Venezuela. While increased numbers of Venezuelans have immigrated since their economy has failed, in part because Venezuela is isolated and the United States declared economic war on the country.  According to The Migration Policy Institute, South America made up only 8 percent of all foreign born immigrants in the United States in 2022. So just a snapshot, but it gives an idea that overall numbers of immigrants over the years are related to a greater systemic problem in the global political and economic order or a civilizational breakdown in how everyone is valued.

There have been genocides committed against Central Americans more recently than the Jewish Holocaust, and now they are being imprisoned in camps. Yet, somehow it was "offensive" to call these concentration camps? What's crazy to me is all the propaganda attached to the immigration issue or debate. Lines like people are coming to America because "America is the most prosperous country in the history of the world" or people are coming to America because "America is a beacon for the world" or people are coming to America because "America is the greatest country in the history of the world." And obviously it is prosperous, has positive qualities and has qualities better than that which people are leaving, but it is a bit more complex why people are leaving and coming. And how do you determine the 'best country in the history of the world?' There's probably qualities in countries that people are leaving that are better than America and qualities that are worse.

Right wing appeal to sensational crimes committed by individuals to bolster anti immigrant policies like deportation is a bit like saying Loreena Bobbit chopped off that man's genitals so therefore we should get rid of all women in society. It is that idiotic and psychopathic.

America is a complex place and I think it's ok to admit to its complexities. So while it is nice to show pictures of the Statue of Liberty and talk about welcoming poor people into America while it offers opportunity, relative freedom (or used to attempt to) and hope to people, it feeds off of them as well. I think it is ok to also state that America has a history in which it likes to exploit immigrants, so each generation lives off the backs of new immigrants as they rise. The most common example is to describe how we eat food, which is largely picked by immigrants making small wages, keeping food prices down. That's the modern example. 

America functions off the backs of immigrants and we can never make large numbers of these immigrants citizens with access to proper education, housing or healthcare. Large swaths of Americans are fine accepting more immigrants and running the economy off their backs, but can’t again make them citizens. Many seem to think this is acceptable. The whole system benefits from the fact that Democrats function as the good cop saying they want to solve immigration problems and create a "path to citizenship" and then Republicans play the game they've played for over 100 years and drum up racist fears making the political and social environment, as i said, hostile for immigrants. Meanwhile the rest of us 2nd 3rd 4th and so on generation immigrants receive privileges and luxuries off this setup. The whole thing is wrong.

Nicole Wallace was on TV in April 0f 2019 and stated that Bush was great for immigrants because he had compassion. Bush created ICE, but the Bush rehabilitation project otherwise known as the Trump Presidency was alive and well. There was a Congressional hearing on the border in April of 2019 and a general I think was the speaker and said that pushing people into the desert was used as a deterrent and was 'working.' Besides meaning that the border wall is stupid and fencing as well, there's numerous people who have argued for some time that this is a modern day middle passage. That we are weeding out the strong, who survive the desert and the weak who can't make the trip. I think that this is a correct comparison. The middle passage, if you don't know, is what we call the slave journey on slave ships, where the slave masters would perform this type of weeding out exercises in cruel ways.

Currently there’s a big displacement and conflict happening in Congo -Rwanda right now and I don’t know much about it because I don’t follow world machinations as closely anymore because of the schizophrenia thing where they start conflicts or disasters based on my brain activity for cultural production and making people want to eliminate me. The more I focus on something the more destruction happens. I was reminded of what I thought previously a decade or more ago about how I see refugees and underclasses migrating between countries or a hierarchy of nationalities and multicultural and multiracial divides in democracies as deliberate or systematic. Like the refugees or immigrants become cheap labor or surplus labor or permanent underclass and then simultaneously the right wing makes the environment hostile for them and then conflict justifies heavy draconian laws,  hordes domestic fears or  white fear for instance in certain locations and corrals wealthy people into their camp by promises of ‘fixing the crisis on the border.’ They rely on division in the society to conquer lower classes and keep them from organizing in unified universalism fashion. This creates a basic undemocratic society in which citizen stakeholders hold onto elevated status voting status and gain voting majorities to keep their interests met like in the old days of the Republic when slaves couldn’t vote but fears of rebellion abounded. I think they do this neocolonial empire by using people of foreign societies to be leaders of those countries or criminals and commit atrocity to prove tenets of white supremacist societies or to the imperial centers that they are inherently more civilized. In fact, if you see the world this way, Israel Palestine actually functions remarkably into this patterned system that I speculate is in existence. Additionally cultural production of war could also function as taking the gaze off other incidents. I’ve previously discussed in this yet to be edited manuscript how it is done to dwarf other incidents in the public’s consciousness or other issues threatening the dominant narrative. It is potentially done as a spectacle to keep peoples eyes on a situation or cultural production that keeps a narrative going and protects against news or narratives slipping through the grasp of rulers.

This is done to keep an underclass migrating from place to place and settling as an underclass that elevates after generations into a different strata where their descendants initiate the lower classes into class politics and dominate newer underclass. In America, imagine how much things would cost in this country if we didn't have low wage earning immigrants doing all the jobs and the thanks they get is blame for our civilization's fundamental breakdown in how it values us all.

Immigration opposition works to bolster opposition to other social programs and keeps otherwise 19^th century ideas viable in the 21^st century for certain segments of the population. I don't really understand rich people logic ideologically and how they get everyone buying in. It goes like this "I worked hard in my 20s and 30s. I invested successfully and I got rich. Everyone else can work til they are 75 or 80 and or die on the street" Does that pass any intellectual merit as democratic citizens? If not, then why do people vote for Heritage Foundation candidates who want to cut a program like social security and don't want to save it other than they convince everyone into thinking all the problems in the country are caused by immigrants and they will deport them and "close the borders." 60 percent of newly arrived migrants find jobs according the The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. This number is basically the number of people employed percentage wise among the entire U.S population. In other words they are absorbed into the economic structure.

To conclude my personal thoughts that may have received some attention from the Intelligence Agencies, the root of the "immigration problem" in America is violence, global poverty and modern as well as historical global empire. And some will probably argue that the current system is fine and that immigration in America, as is, makes America strong and they would be right, largely. There are some who see a system that weeds out bad apples from good apples and that periodic amnesty to cheap and willing laborers who then 'make a better life for themselves and their descendents' and only 'if they work hard' is fine. In fact, people often boast of their working class immigrant ancestors making the backbone of the American economy and cultural and social sphere. But this leads one, if they examine the 'problem,' to ask if it is right to continuously count on an exploited class of people to run the economy, who then live as second class citizens in America. As stated previously, the historical empires, particularly the American, Portuguese and Spanish are central to 'immigration' within the modern southern borders. And poverty within those borders inevitably adds to that central original fact. So I don't see how you can now divorce the people from each other by modern National Boundaries, in which wealth and wealthy travel across boundaries like the imperial predecessors and now do so as their modern counterparts, but the poor are expected to 'break the law' in order to travel and earn a living, thus making them second class citizens and not having democratic voting rights etc in the societies they live in. So I think it is time to start exploring or asking questions about democratic integration of the former and current empires and their modern states.

In the opening pages of Michio Kaku's, The Future of Humanity, he lays out how it is inevitable that Earth will become inhospitable either for a period of time or permanently due to the death of our star and changing conditions in our solar system in the future. Due to this, we have to do what all species must do to survive. We must move and adapt. It is necessary for the survival of humanity to figure out how to explore the cosmos and look for other worlds to live in, whether they be other solar systems in our universe or escaping our universe altogether when it eventually freezes. As I read this and share this conclusion by the author, I'm not making an argument that we should just disregard the lifespan and hospitality of this planet or its ecosystem and its gift of life and habitat. It makes no sense to just move constantly due to destroying our own habitat prematurely. In fact, I think if we do such a thing that we are messing with the synchronicity and harmony of the cosmos and we will face conflict and turmoil due to such behavior. The fact that for humanity to survive the inevitable inhospitality of earth or solar system or universe in the future it must migrate and adapt is sort of why it's laughable that AMericans would be against an immigrant searching for life or new home in America. We are responsible as a species for each other. We will need to leave the planet itself as a civilization or species. Unless one is disregarding the American Revolution and the all men created equal declaration and believe you have some divine right by which you were born to life and supremacist notion that you are part of some elite group selected to migrate when you like and only your group, then there's no coherence to the idea that anti -immigration is "Pro American"

Religion... origins

Sometimes I think that the transhumanist or elite imperial humans are trying to make a new religion and are using us Targeted Individuals or schizophrenics as sacrifices and religious figures in their religious cults. The possible being or life force that either demanded we call them God or we decided to call God can do good things and make beautiful things, but be simultaneously be a pscyhopath.

Sometimes people assumed I was religiously Christian because I sought common ground with Christians or would attend church due to being raised catholic. I actually am not. I think god is likely a psycho if Christian records are correct and I have gnostic parallel ideas. I think there is something to intelligent design. I just find religion interesting from a human practice or analysis perspective like in anthropological power analysis cultural and historical perspective.

One thing I think is that if the Abrahamic-Judeo-Christian story is a myth based in some human historical truth and if there is a being who created the life on this Earth as it is, particularly humans, and then demanded we worship them and call them God, then they are probably a psychopath. Listening to Michael Tsarion's Brotherhood of Death in which he discusses hidden fraternities and hidden groups, he discusses excommunication, which is essentially the deprivation of the privileges offered by whatever group's membership. I'm an excommunicated cyber slave American. In druidic times, such sentence was only superseded by death. All this 'Targeted Individual' material and phenomena I believe is FBI to further harass people subject to excommunication, ritual abuse and Schizophrenia programs.

Often it is promulgated in my view or in conversation where I go that my life or all life is part of God’s plan. I respect people with this view and I see that it can be comforting on some level, but for me I can't understand the whole "it is all part of God's plan." There is so much suffering in the world and I'm not talking about myself or anything and when someone says this, it makes me think " your God is a psychopath?" Then people start thinking I'm a Satanist, which I am in no way. I think I'm non-biblical. But I guess I'll add that I could see intelligent design and I am inclined to believe in intelligent design. And if this is all a simulation of some sort, then the designer has got to be a little nuts. Technology is becoming biblical. People can create natural disasters and artificially inseminate women. Blind people can see. Sick people get well etc. This leads some people to suspect biblical stories documented or were myths about advanced civilizations or time travel.

So if that is true perhaps the Christian religion was fashioned by futurists  and time travelers to mock people. I read a book titled Caesar's Messiah, by Joe Atwill. It is a theory based on mathematical impossibilities and improbabilities that the gospels were written by the Flavian family during the Flavian Dynasty. And that Christianity is a giant religion created by Roman emperors to undermine messianic Judaism due to the revolution in Rome by the Sicarri, According to the theory the Flavians then have people worship the emperor as a god, informing posterity of the fact by elaborate parody maze throughout the New Testament using a universally acknowledged techning of Typlology found throughout the Bible. I find the theory to be very probable. And thought it was a good book. I also think that the Bible is likely a symbolic representation on a technique of rule or political technology. Control two worlds, heaven and hell or majestic world and underworld with all of your own people ("celestial beings") then have everybody align with either or and fight wars controlled by you and your aristocrats. I guess that I'll follow up that I think it is possible that there is a creator that wants to be called God and worshiped and that there is circumstantial evidence for this.

The God Code was a book by Greg Braden in which he proclaims that there is a code in our DNA which when transposed or decoded using Arabic and Hebrew and the periodic table of elements, reads "God Eternal in The Body." I have no real knowledge of Hebrew and the number coded used by Braden, so I don't have an educated background to know if the elaborate method for finding the code is possible with intent to find it or if there really is something to the lack of chance alleged to have the code read such a message. I lean towards there being something to it. There was a scientist who commented on this idea in that they stated that the chromosome idea of a natural mutation which made humans so different than other hominids or chimpanzees for instance and other animals actually is akin to a 747 plane being put together by a tornado. Supposedly we know this because of the way human intervention in DNA synthetic mutation and creation leaves markers of intervention.

I'm not religious, but I do think it is very possible and even likely that there is intelligent design in life. I personally speculate that there was at some point beings that wanted to be referred to as gods or god and that they wanted to be worshipped. I don't worship them. I think that they may have designed or created human life or dna very possibly though science or supernatural means. I also think that there could be a life force or being in the universe that parallels these gods or god wannabes and supersedes it rectifying the psychopathy or perhaps just foolish or fallible nature of earth's possible God or Gods. I also think that humans fashioned themselves as gods or god, perhaps in emulation. Something akin to secret societies like in Joseph Atwill's book about the Flavians in Caesar's Messiah.

What we know about history is that there was a global society that was the People of the serpent or something so all these stories from the bible and in other creation and ancient histories or mythologies all allude to the serpent. Some say that there was knowledge of frequency and serpent like energies in electromagnetics and life and biology so that there were people who understood this knowledge and were referenced as "serpent like" or "Reptillian" which is a possible explanation for mythologies of reptilian humanoids. It's theorized by some that people who were referenced as reptilians with serpent heads were metaphors for knowledge of the unseen energy shape of the universe and life.

Philosophy:

•  “Man is not made for the state; the state is made for man. To deprive man of freedom is to relegate him to the status of a thing, rather than elevate him to the status of a person. Man must never be treated as a means to the end of the state, but always as an end within himself.”

        --Martin Luther King Jr.

• I don't really like the propaganda which tells us all to become servants so that we can be exploited, but simultaneously I think one of my most useful days in life was a service project in Mexico helping put a roof on the on a house. I felt like it mattered what I was doing. Now, really, that roof was a bandaid on a huge injustice and economic disparity and so I'm not saying that it is some end all putting roofs unprofessionally on makeshift houses, but just working to help people made me feel good and like something got better for a small fraction. I'm hesitant to say its a 'favorite day' because you know it was somewhat exposing the limited resources we have to make a difference in the current system, but the people were all great &hard working and caring and it was everybody pulling together. It was people from the local community there. The people whose house it was deserve so much more.

• I saw a few people bring up an apparent talking point that diminishes Alexandria Ocasio Cortez because a year before running for office she was a bartender and now she is a congressperson. Am I wrong to say that many of the revolutionary war figures or founding fathers were workers in taverns or were owners of Taverns? Also, another critique was that she allegedly changed her position on her website on war and peace and made it more of a silent statement on the issue, which I see as a potentially fair critique, but it had me thinking. For people that are anti war or non-violent(i am probably mostly like that) I ask what do you do in the face of a Nazi like regime that genocides people like Jews or invades other countries and kills innocent people? For people that are pro-military or pro-war for the sake of protecting human rights, I ask are you willing to kill innocent people to protect innocent people? And, of course, I ask these questions while not negating the question of motives and actions leading to the circumstances, which would provoke the questions and hypothetical or historical circumstances in the first place because there is more complexities like financing of thuggish political parties, banks etc.. I also would ask a now sitting congressperson: what about the fact that America is now itself a lawless state having pulled out of the Geneva Conventions, shouldn't that be considered when supporting the state's war making capabilities?

Conspiracy:

• "Is complaining about the secret services crazy? No. The people who do are simply the victims of a very large system that commits unlawful or criminal acts at least as often as large companies do. This is why victims are no more unusual than people who claim to have been defrauded by their telecommunication company or their insurance provider."

• The mass shootings are likely psychological operations. Everybody in the intelligence field knows about them.

• There is so much in the way of Psychological Operations coming at us that relevant information gets swallowed by new information and disinformation: One common troth of information is the info that is in the public domain about Operation Paperclip in which Nazi Scientists were brought into the United States and incorporated into the National Security state structure and given positions in organizations such as NASA. This often obscures that monied interests in America played a significant role in propping up the Nazi's as they rose to power and afterward.

• There are definitely true things about the targeting program like artificial dreams, digital twins & parallel simulated realities informing and influencing this one, but I speculate that someone discovered how to see and influence events through time even if that someone is AI.

Disinformation:

• For people who don't think its possible that Bob Marley was assassinated by the government for his music: Do you think that the government just stopped at the Kennedy family and that was it? Operation 40 was actually a project under Kennedy too. The reason I bring it up, is because Kyrie Irving was held out as crazy for saying the Earth is flat. There is a weird information stream on the internet claiming the earth is flat, but in the article I read, it simultaneously classified his belief that Bob Marley was assassinated as ‘crazy.’

• Dan Baum's reported interview with Erlichman should be all over the place. And he should be grilled on why he didn't reveal it for twenty years. There should be a drug war litmus test for the new Supreme Court Justice. Excerpt from Harpers Magazine Article by Dan Baum: Top Nixon Advisor John Ehrlichman on Nixon's war on drugs: “You want to know what this was really all about?” Ehrlichman asked with the bluntness of a man who, after public disgrace and a stretch in federal prison, had little left to protect. “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.” 

Corona Virus

When there’s demonstratively duplicity and manipulation you should ask the scope of the duplicity and manipulation. Like if there’s something you become aware of, was it intended you become aware of it? When people draw up war plans, I know they factor in conclusions to be drawn by various populations.

Due to my knowledge of Mind Control, Weather Control, Total Information Awareness, World Sentient Simulation, Full Spectrum Dominance, Biological Warfare being heralded by Neo Conservatives in the George W. Bush administration as "politically useful tool," in a coming “American Century, I know that there is effort to control everything. Couple that with the practice of racketeering and you have a potential scam being played in Covid 19. Now add my personal experience being hit with covert weapons systems by govt taken to hospitals which lied and turned me into a customer of big pharma and I am very skeptical about what Covid 19 is and what we are being told.

Former president of Bolivia, Evo Morales, has stated that he believes the Covid 19 virus is biological warfare, the intelligence agencies of the United States and the consensus here from corporate /state tv is that biological testing joint from U.S and China was responsible for an accident resulting in the Pandemic. Evo Morales' contention is erased from media who don’t cover the thought of bio warfare even though top gov't officials in The Bush administration stated publicly that biological warfare would be a 'politically useful tool' in an "American Century." Simultaneous to this apparent coverup of biowarfare is the fact that Directed Energy Weapons electronic war crimes are being openly discussed but only for U.S. Government personnel. This leads me to question what, if any, relation DEW has to Covid. I personally experienced symptoms of covid such as restricted breathing for five minutes at night when other weapons testing is typically done on me, producing bodily health effects. The body is electrical and can be manipulated externally as well as through nanotech linked electronically to external sources. I also remind the reader of the transcript of Robert Naelsund's lecture where he describes the allegation made by two British Scientists that the United States possessed a supercomputer controlled system that could control people's health and brain.

On a couple of occasions at night for five minutes I experienced symptoms such as restricted breathing and lung restriction and pressure. It quickly went away and fell in line with the usual heart and chest pain and other weapons testing I get at night as I fall asleep. Someone wanted me to know that they could induce symptoms stated to take place with Covid 19. Due to the significance of life and death, questioning government authorities or the official story during Covid 19 is met with very emotional responses. When you are a Targeted Individual you experience years of millions of people lying daily about the true nature of society and government. You are usually funneled into the mental health ward at your local hospital where the medical establishment participates in large scale fraud at every hospital covering up a system which dolls out life and death. Millions of people lie daily about something as serious as murder by the state and human rights abuses that include human trafficking, rape and weapons experiments that bring people to the brink of death and give them organ damage. So when Covid 19 rolled around I was not ready to trust government officials and the medical establishment reporting a deadly virus that required them to shut down, isolate and excuse overt massive surveillance. I know that they lie about serious issues every day and that millions are capable of perpetuating a big lie. However, I live with people who have underlying conditions and I am in only a position to respect what the authorities say as they do sometimes tell the truth. I know that corona virus has been around for 60 70 years or something and so I believe there are definitely people getting something called Covid 19 and dying. I just don't know how many are getting it and how many are dying were the numbers subject to lies, where does it begin and end? That I don't know. Where does high tech weapons testing come into play? That I don't know either.

I actually got Covid while writing this book but still have these thoughts about all of it. I tested and came out negative the first test, so I figured I just had a headache. Then tested the next day and had covid positive. So, I didn't quarantine first day after then negative test and two family members got covid as well. It makes me conclude that it’s inevitable that if I live with elderly people, I’m going to eventually go do something and bring back an illness to them which can be dangerous. Even though this time I was with most of them on the trip. So, I think this makes me conclude that I need to move out or have my own living quarters. I'm assuming i got it on the trip up the coast, but apparently Saugus where i live was a major hotspot in la county for Covid. I got symptoms about 2 days into the trip and supposedly it takes two to 3 days for symptoms to appear.

 I actually had this thought or fear before Covid 19 that some covert team would pass me an illness on a cart I used at Trader Joe’s and kill my family. So I think Dr. Fauci is likely evil.

Another aspect to the Corona Virus phenomena is that it is deliberately making people live like TIs since some keep 'social distance and don't socialize, travel, eat out or I am hesitant to because of harassment etc. This is not an endorsement of the tactic, but it is relevant to know that an organization that started all this has that in mind. People are basically slaves during stay at home lockdowns, they are working and can't go anywhere or do anything with their free time. They can exercise.

 More Miscellaneous thoughts:

• I shared an article in April of 2018 about the Owl as a symbol of a secret society and the following night an owl showed up hooting outside my window. #worldsentientsimulation

•  From Poland's defense minister investigating victims of electromagnetic weapons, to the Turkish government report on synthetic telepathy murder, to the Cuban Diplomats sonic attack, to the FBI CIA and NSA whistleblowers, to the Gangstalking recruitment videos at CSIS, to the Fusion Center 'accidental' release of mind control documents, to Facebook mind reading research, I've come to the conclusion that disclosure about counterterrorism mind control, synthetic telepathy, and remote neural monitoring is going to happen at an already decided timeline. I don't believe any action from myself will speed it along or slow it down. But I don't know if it will ever be full disclosure with a Church Committee or not or awards to victims. The payoff to victims from the 60s and 70s was very minimal. I know in my case that no court case could really repay or rectify the destruction of life.

• The gov't and corporations possess technology that can heat the ionosphere and intensify or steer weather. So the cause of climate change may be something other than just carbon emissions.

• I'm not one of these people who want to make Black Lives Matter say "all lives matter". I know that we live in a historical white power society with racist secret societies established in government and society writing laws and sitting as judges and acting as police forces killing black people at higher rates and policing black people to target black communities as a response to the civil war and civil rights movement. I know that dominant white society aided and abetted this process. However, I do have a problem when mainstream media erases police shootings of "white" people and acts like it doesn't happen at a high rate, even though it is lower than black and brown. They then present protests where "white" people protest police shootings as all altruistic do gooder empathetic white people. I'm sure that is a motivation, but white people also have bad experiences with police in our abusive police state. And presenting policing solely as a problem in which we have to deal with racism and once we deal with that things will be fine ignores that we have an abusive police state problem in which the police are abusing people.

• I also believe that some people selected me to be targeted because I was a white person sympathetic to racial issues, but critical as a subject of racial power employment by the state. It’s possible I became a good subject to experiment with to further an agenda either by displaying the contents of my brain or by obtaining contents of my brain in order to be able to appeal to those critical of racial power employment by state. My brain produced content that they could employ. Meanwhile they could work in such a way as to neutralize me. It is all very confusing to me, and I have not got a sure handle on it all as I am just a subject analyzing the feedback and effort to control me. That has been the one constant throughout this whole ordeal. The state wants to monitor and control what I say, think, do, eat and drink. They reward their approved commentary or speech and retaliate against disapproved commentary or speech with negative feedback. I don’t know that they see it as retaliation. They probably characterize it as some new system of communication or the “hive mind” as it's been characterized as. I have revealed some of my perspective in this book, such as that you can be subject to torture or other human rights abuses and that it violates one's freedom to be subject to this program, but it is not the dominating perspective in society. I think one reason people don’t talk about mind reading satellite, security service stalking, Directed Energy Weapons is that they view system of social control as superior to chaos and violence of the past. There is an embracing of the potential stability provided by controlling people's thoughts and lives.

• Sophisticated white supremacists at the top of society or white people at the top of society who created and benefitted from white supremacy project the most align with other races in hierarchy and weaponize the state to war on lower classes of whites and other races.

• -Warped beliefs or beliefs that lead to warped behavior by general society 1. abuse makes the person stronger 2. survival of the fittest 3. Privacy is old world 4. sacrifice for the greater good or God . 5. be a part of something bigger than yourself. 6. rule by mob majority rules

 Parting Thoughts: 

I view the Palestine and Israel conflict along lines similar to 9/11 and covid. It is a war to commit genocide for reverse backlash. In the Covid case it was anti-government sentiment in another its anti-Judaic sentiment both pro-fascist. I wonder if there is not some strategic imperative to work the backlash angle through duplicity phased revelation in false flag macro scale in response to Vietnam by the Pentagon with 9/11 and such. Essentially Vietnam showed the power of backlash and phased revelation of misdeeds and lies. Seems like implementation of such a strategy would be imperative to the human minds at the pentagon, just change the deck chairs around and such and use inertia of public or world reaction to one's advantage.

Conventional views in most media posit that powerful political organizations even if they are Imperial managers would never prop up political organizations to do evil deeds for the purposes of propaganda itself or as cultural production in and of itself to achieve a concealed objective or that compartmentalization in government doesn’t allow for interweaving of organized persons. That’s what one is supposed to believe is real. When for instance, The United States Government Military and Intelligence agencies train dictators or ship weapons to drug cartels or train militaries around the world, supposedly calculations are not made about the latent or residual effect on, say, global racial politics in imagery that will be produced or about processed knowledge of violence and manipulative control. Total Information Awareness and Full Spectrum Dominance are not to be accounted for in our analysis? I mean the open culture of the American government is to dominate all spectrums and to be aware of all information. I am not supposed to take into account that war planners plan for various populations around the world and how they will respond to an event or consume imagery and process knowledge of the violence?  Furthermore, the idea of concealment, duplicity and manipulation in a scenario of violent events or wars is not to be entertained. And nothing can be controlled outside of U.S bipartisanship for phased operations because only Marvel operates in phases. This is the conventional view of reality that we are fed across most media.

I write in this book a section which questions war as cultural production.  Here I will introduce for anyone to dissect, questions I have had about Israel and destruction of Gaza as potential antisemitic cultural production. If somebody slaps a big Jewish star of David on a flag and then commits oppression and crimes and atrocity in its name, seems like that is what you would do if you were trying to instigate antisemitism around the world. I guess I’m a little weary of 1, Israeli crimes with giant star of David flag for decades. 2. antisemitism taking place often in response to it and 3, people mobilizing against Israel and genocide in Palestine when these very same people largely showed support or indifference to genocides in Yemen and Biowar genocide through Covid. Like they’ve demonstrated pro-genocide behavior and now are organized in mass mobilization which was previously something that happened in 2011 with the Arab Spring and threats of world war and ensuing bombing or spiral of violence that seemingly had propaganda and structure borrowed from World War 1 propagansda. So I think Netanyahu who grew up partly in the United States and Likud could be mole or Israel could be mole for Europe or America. I happen to know that its likely Hamas couldn’t plan a terror attack that allegedly happened without being known the moment they thought it in their head.

There was a mob that broke into houses in DC during this same time period. I had previously written the section of my preface and published it on the internet and said DC was a warped utopia with its wealthy spaces and nearby historical slave plantations rather than helping the world build actual utopias for us all to live in. Seems like someone was trying to make me out to be instigator of mob violence, similar to Donald Trump Jan 6th. Perhaps this is chaos theory at play.  My brain is used for grand experimentation, duplicity and manipulation. I’m sure these home invasions will result in a more draconian fortress America. Martin Luther King Jr. has been dead for 6 decades almost and so there’s no non violent movement in America. There is just chaos and so we get people possibly planning WWIII and who knows what will happen here in America. There’s a lack of dignity involved in invading someone’s home, but would you expect Nazis to be secure in home during world war 2 genocide of jews? But I don’t think World War 3 ends well for anyone, so the line crossed sends us down a terrible path I think. It seems like what happened in Africa and Rwanda and Congo in the 90s and 2000s could potentially happen here and in Middle East. What's happening in Israel and gaza and all wars could be part of a greater machination in which there are false flag ops within false flag ops to dehumanize various populations. Like its entirely possible that Israel is an operation by a group to send Jewish refugees into fire and designed rapture and that Hamas is done as an op to dehumanize Palestinians for two pronged genocide or war or something. Like the proverbial big chess board. It’s probably not accidental that Secret Invasions basically has this plot scenario from Marvel. Marvel usually discloses. "Order out of Chaos" is the etymologically Latin phrase which I think describes this.

Through chaotic violence, the powers that be can run dirty control systems. The violence in the United states and degeneration or incivility is all by design in my estimation to pave way for more violence and order out of it. I question Nazism similarly. Like on one hand it could have just been arrogance and insanity, but it doesn't seem too intelligent or of calculated a move that in order to garner support for "Aryans," you’d try to fight the whole world and declare yourself supreme. What is the ultimate function of Israel? Who are the players controlling it ultimately playing for? Could Hitler have been a mole? What are the UFOs operating under organizationally? What role has the breakaway civilization played in wars throughout the past century?

I don't really understand why people argue Ukraine shouldn't drag world into nuclear Armageddon to obtain a "free Ukraine", but "Free Palestine" proponents should support political opposition to Israel or that Israel shouldn't enter a ceasefire or the even disturbing notion that October 7th was justified, which could very well cause Nuclear Armageddon. We are supposed to be good little boys and girls and shut up about it and keep supporting conflict. Israel is in fact practicing genocide and ethnic cleansing. Most people in the world have ancestors who ran from such things somewhere someday back when. Some in modern times could have stayed and fought years, decades or centuries until Nuclear Armageddon. Its not 1600 anymore or even 1900. It is a nuclear proliferated world. This conflict is with a nuclear power that has many military enemies in the region. People act like its tribal war, team sports or gladiators suffering to be rooted for.

Israel probably should have never been created and our governments should have tried to create solutions to Palestinians and Israelis coexisting rather than supporting right wing governments. But Israel did become a settler state and basically won. From a third-4th generation ethnic cleansing descendent and settler. I think of these things as now living relatively peaceful in America and think that it'd be better to pressure my government to grant Palestinian Survivors asylum. Migration and war is a way of the world, settling too I suppose. I don't see the point of egging on World War III telling Palestinians to stay and fight or live like that. I fear that both countries are being sacrificed in grand chessboard war as cultural production dual genocides or a cultural production show of mass sacrifices. These were my views before the October 7^th attack and ensuing response by Israel which as of this writing looks like a genocide in progress. I fear it was done in response to this book.

Maybe NATO united, feared a united middle east and such so they put in moles likely to pit the region into divide. I don’t know just feels that way to me of course like I asked before what roles are the UFO Breakaway civilization playing organizationally in all this war of the past century. This type of tactic is why I question false flags within false flags and idea of doing terrible injustice and mass destruction in the name of defending lets say Person “D.” Seems like you give “D” lots of enemies and incentive to eliminate “D.” I think its possible that Israel Palestine is divide conquer. Perhaps even for the world. In response to my thoughts over the years and writing in this book, a terrorist organization created disasters all over the world As I got closer to finishing it there were particular events in Mexico, Hawaii and Palestine and Israel. It was done so that someone will decide to attack me tactically. It is done so that people will blame me and make people irrationally assign responsibility on me when it is completely arbitrarily coordinated with my actions.

Chapter 9

War Subverts Reality

While writing this book I began listening to a Spotify Podcast about police deputy gangs. The podcast was about secret societies. The episode I listened to was about the Banditos of East LA Sherriff’s division. Appearently, a tactic cited by other officers who were abused by this particular gang is that they would try to run people off the highway or strike them with vehicles. This is in common with my experience as a recipient of police threats and subsequent events on the highway. After seeking investigation with the LAPD I began hearing voices in my head. There are now currently commercial companies which demonstrate that technology to target an individual with audible sound is real. This is sound in which only the target hears it. Noveto and Aftershokz are two companies demonstrating this technology.

The following is the blog entry I was working on when the Police threatened me through Directed Conversation that they "f*ck people up when they least expect it" and a car a few days later tried to crash into me on the freeway in Los Angeles (on my grandpa's death date) on the way To LA Valley College to take a linguistics class. Does this blog article and police behavior sound like a totalitarian state or do you think I am crazy and started hearing voices coincidentally even though today, as documented, the companies Noveto and Aftershokz demonstrate commercial technology to beam sound into a person's head remotely that only they hear? I'd like to point out that the blog post I was working on I was attempting to draw attention drew to assassinations or wars being initiated on April 4th, the death date of Martin Luther King Jr (and diary entry date in 1984 commentary about "War Flicks." I also cited an article in which an author pointed out that wars were initiated on dates of previous wars' starting date and birthday of Martin Luther King Jr as if by commemoration. Amidst writing this blog post, The attack I experienced on the highway took place April 13th, my Grandpa's death date.

Blog Entry: War Subverts Reality

In her book examining the Hatian revolution, Modernity Disavowed, Professor and Author Sibylle Fischer discusses the silencing of events or the replacing of one event with other events and deliberate attempts by the subordinator class or intellectual elites to mold nations, to mold the psyche of the masses.

 From 1996 - 2003 5.4 million people died in Congo. Its cover-up is a crime bigger than The War on Terror and any 9/11 staging. The Democratic party was and is heavily involved, but they would have people believe that they are just an incompetent party and that the two events, The War on Terror/9-11 and war in central Africa and Congo are unrelated. In this blog, I define war as an ideological construction to compel participation and induce obedience in the maintenance and accumulation of power and questioned The War on Terror as a staged propaganda event to manage political reality and to distract from the totality of warring operations. I attempted to point out how through deliberate crafted discourse, there is collusion of the imperial parties of America in doing so. To be clear, war is for the purpose of propaganda. It is a cultural production. Additionally, I questioned it as a function to create chaos and terror in particular places, being deliberate punishment of nations as a demonstration of power. 

"What hurts the most is why? What has led them to cross the oceans to kill their own children?" -Iraqi Woman questioning the attack on humanity which the Iraq war was.

"Can you imagine Africans being in control of a vital mineral for The U.S and Aerospace industry?" -Maurice Carney Executive Director of Friends of The Congo.

The measure of 30 years worth of atrocity heaped upon peoples of Iraq and Afghanistan, in which Osama Bin Laden, at age 22, was initiated as a consul, is inestimable. Aside from delivering the providential death blow on evil's iconic figure, held in a gift wrapped, fantastical recall of the 19th century demonization of the criminal, opium producing oriental and besides the millenial old representation of the enemy, personified as a growth, spawned from slivered satanic flesh, surreptitiously masked in evil's lair, the extrajudicial killing of Osama Bin Laden and "burial at sea" was a theatrical display of a hit on a witness to and suspect of 30 years of criminal activity. Following the President's May 1st pogrom call and the gesticular jingo monsoon arousal at the displaying of the remnants of Operation Geronimo, placard pumping CNN, chief operator in bringing about the Iraq war buildup, ran a segment in which Teach for America Head and Chief propagandist, Walter Isaacson, diagnosed Pakistan, a nation of 170 million people, with 'subnormality.' This apparent killing and diagnoses of Pakistan came amidst the expansion of bombing across Africa and a NATO campaign that saw 20,000 airstrikes, or what's been called 'therapy,' carried out in Libya. The campaign is championed as success by the World Security Network, who derides the "endless diagnosis that replaces the 'therapy'" inherent in tens of thousands of NATO bombs and proxy warfare. 
                                                     

In an interview (video of conversation @ 8:20) that took place during the Bombing of Libya on Bill Maher's Real Time, NBC reporter Richard Engel asserted that NATO bombing in Libya was "boring." As the topic shifted, with little discussion provided from Engel, Maher questioned the reason for keeping U.S force in Afghanistan after the reported assassination of Osama Bin Laden and as the pace of 'withdrawal' came into discussion, Engel employed the 'war fatigue' argument, stating that pace was 'something that could be debated.' Engel said that he spoke to "the people who organized the war" (specifying Iraq and Afghanistan) and said that they never expected it to last 10 years and that there were lots of people in the military who wanted to keep a small presence in Iraq and Afghanistan to carry out 'limited objectives' (massive facts being that the objective was to occupy). And with a ho hum gesturing pun, Engel said that "these wars keep droning on and on." Engel continued reducing war in Afghanistan and Iraq to a microcosmic analogy, asking viewers to:

"Think of it this way. If in this theater, 10 years ago, someone organised an attack on the United States and we wanted to make sure that never happens again. You can do 2 things. Either take over the whole theater. And get deeply involved and take over the management and say I want to see your books. I want to really get involved in your life and try and re-create the theater so it can never happen again. Or, you post a few security guards in the building and have some observation and that way you have some way to do it and that seems like the cheaper way."

Aside from the fact that the past 10 years of particular slaughter is reduced to an expense, there are alot of other suppositions which beg a ton of questions. The obviousness of not asking an imaginary Richard Engel (and evidently a real Engel), I hope temporarily sufficient. Imperial fortresses, bases, mass desecration are like mustard stains. What was additionally eerie was that he began discussion about Obama in Ireland and then ended with an analogy that for me was peculiarly similar to Thomas Carlyle's conclusion in the racist-supremacist satire regarding Irish and Jamaicans in 'The Occasional Discourse On The Negro Question,' later turned into a more pejorative titled pamphlet in which Carlyle concludes:

"Most Thinking People!-- If hen-stealing prevail to a plainly unendurable extent. will you station police officers at every henroost; and keeping them watching and cruising incessantly to and fro over the Parrish in the unwholesome dark, at enormous expense. with almost no effect; or will you not try rather to discover where the fox's den is and kill the fox?"

The cheap imperialist trick, strange satiric current and link, in any event, along with passe discussion about killer robot drones absent of people at the end of the bombing and the 'boring' Libya onslaught reflects much of what is disturbing. The link could be that in the 1849 supremacist rant, Carlysle basically asserts the laws of physics, so to speak, that underscore the propellant forces of psychosis in our society. Among other things, Carlyle declares the supreme law for all lands, in all countries, under this sky is for a class of cultivators, stronger, worthier to by fortune of war, be made proprietor in order to educe the proper fruits from the land.

"A violence that erased every sign of itself would be remarkably inefficient...To acquire its usefulness in the play of domination, violence must be whispered about, recalled by its victims and hinted at in future threats."- Tim Mitchel Author of Rule of Experts          

"April 4th, 1984 Last night to the flicks all war films." -George Orewell's opening diary entry in 1984   

         

The April 4th assassination Julian Mer Khamis outside what is an actual microscopic reality of Engel's theater in Palestine took place within the occupation that Palestinians face in Gaza and the expanding extrajudicial killing spaces where the symbolic role of 'predator' drone bombers have killed thousands of people or 'bugsplat' in 'ungoverned spaces' as pointed out in 2 articles by Kalash Srinivasan  of Foreign Policy in Focus who  discusses the vast expansion of power and by Pulse Media's Muhammad Idrees Muhamed.

In his article, From Aid and Humanitarianism to Solidarity, on Pambazuka News, Horace Campbell, a Professor of African Studies at Syracuse University, touches upon in greater detail, the reductionist "rendition of social reality" permeating through current formulations and operations. He discusses how the "people of Africa have had to contend with the centrality of force in production." There is perhaps, no people facing the greater degree of physical affects of this annihilation of consciousness through omission as exemplified in the exchange between Maher and Engel with regards to Libya than in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where UN reports determine that more than 6 million people have died as a result of over 15 years of proxy warfare, driven largely by exogenous quests for resources to pump into our mass production and consumption economy. While the 'missionaries of post industrial ideology'- TVs- where pumps like CNN reside, beat the war drums for Iraq and Afghanistan only to blunt them out of sensibility when need be, Congo, (the plunder of which is essential to what has transpired in Afghanistan and Iraq), has been- despite the efforts of The Break The Silence Campaign, Foreign Policy in Focus and people like Cynthia Mckinney largely omitted. In the report below, The Congo is present in the form of a sociopathic if not sadistic joke called The Utopia. The 1.2 billion dollar ship, discussed by journalist Mark Ames, is a project of Samsung, the largest electronics company in the world, and The Frontier Group, co founded by Carlyle Group member of revolving-door 'defense' establishment, Frank Carlucci. Frank Carlucci happened to be number 2 at The U.S Embassy in The Congo at the time of Patrice Lumumba's assassination.
Reported by CNN, The Utopia is possibly the world's most luxurious ocean liners:

"New Mexico-based investors have teamed with Korea's Samsung Heavy Industries to build The Utopia, an opulent $1.1 billion ocean liner that will travel the globe, hopping between the world's major sporting and cultural events. The 105,000-ton and 1,000-foot long ship -- the weight and length of more than three Lady Liberty statues, from the base of the concrete platform to the top of the torch -- is scheduled for completion in 2013."

"Or alas let them look across to Haiti for a far sterner prophecy." -Thomas Carlyle

"Had he been wiser, or smarter, Patrice Lumumba would have been 39 this year. And the Congo might well have become a nation with no more than the normal ration of African problems instead of a blood-spattered land of savagery, corruption and anarchy—which is largely what Lumumba helped make it."  -Christmas Day Time Magazine 1964                                                                                          

 On March 18th, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! interviewed former Hatian First Lady Mildred Aristide and asked her how she felt after 2 U.S coups and President Obama attempting to prevent the return of Jean Bertrand Aristide, to which she responded rather graciously, that it was perhaps the result of a political framework with which Americans were unwilling to see beyond. Documents disseminated by Wikileaks to Haiti's Liberte and The Nation Magazine provide some details as to how Haiti is subjected to forced poverty and suffering for the sake of corporate and U.S profit.
The presentation of shrewd pragmatism of state department diplomacy as 'context' in examining U.S force in Haiti, however, reads like propaganda. For the actual nature of U.S force in Haiti is one of despotism, atrocity and terror. And yet, the word terror can be so desensitized, especially when attached to fraud. Lavalas, the popular political organization in Haiti, built more schools in 6 years than had been built in 190 years and in a country that had 35 prisons for every 1 school under Baby Doc Duvalier. The Democratic Party and Republican parties, or the U.S government actively oppose this organization and the have done so with brutality and murder. That the U.S government engaged in a 2nd coup on Haiti's democratically elected president in 2004 would be enough on its own to demonstrate diabolical nature of this force considering that the first coup consisted of mass graves for displaying skinned bodies. When one contextualizes it with the fact that 5 million people died between 1996 and 2003 in the coup and war in Congo, it demonstrates pure disdain for people in Haiti and more than just a desire for particular style of governments.

In the midst of fighting in Benghazi, Libya being declared a war, on March 2nd 2011 The Great Lakes Coalition provided a Congressional Briefing outlining the findings of an official United Nations report documenting crimes in The Congo. There have been over 80 companies implicated in profiting off determined wars for pillage. At the briefing, members of The Coalition stated they were heartened by the briefing and as Nii Akuetteh noted, also by history as he had experienced The South African Anti-apartheid Movement. In addition, coalition members such as Kwame Musavuli, who a few weeks later would rebuke NATO bombing in Libya, expressed that the group was encouraged by the what was taking place in North Africa and the Middle East. In response to growing instability, on March 8th, the day before the 'orderly transition regime' which was pledged 160 million dollars, began cracking down on civilians and demonstrators in Tharir square, United States Ambassador Kletz met in Cairo with representatives of an armed group in Benghazi. In a subsequent press conference, the President was peppered with questions regarding Libya and Oil prices. In what she saw as the oncoming bombing of Libya on the 8th year since Shock N Awe over Baghdad, Felicity Arbuthnot discussed that the eyes of the world were not focused on the atrocity of the invasion of Iraq, certainly not the the toll of the total toxicity of the 1st Gulf War till today on Iraq. She noted the irony that the 1st gulf war began on the birthday of Martin Luther King. As it also marked the directive to dispose of Lumumba as well as Laurent Kabila and subsequent invasion of The Congo, perhaps it is more than ironic.

As media production shifted focus many people like Ellene Centime Zeleke were quick to caution against the way race was being operationalized in framing the revolution and against claims in media coverage about the use of 'black African mercenaries' which were being pushed, for instance, from quarters like ABC News ('Black African Mercenaries Know One Thing: To Kill) and former Nigerian Ambassador, one of The Council of Foreign Relations 'African Experts and precipitating as early as February 18th from Omar Al Bashir. To borrow from Zeleke in analogizing language as a body with parts that act as repositories of history, so too can one see the importance of thinking through conglomerations, institutions and offices as not only repositories of history recognized by subjects of their power, but additionally as incarcerators and erasers of history, utilized by seat holders and puppet masters.

The recent use of sectarianism as a technology of imperial rule in Iraq has been documented by Journalists like Dhar Jamail and disseminated in documents by Wikileaks. Anthropologist Maya Mikdashi has examined the particular character and usage of sectarianism, though differentiated from race, as a technology of rule in Lebanon discussing legal discriminatory classes of citizenship and pointed out how a 'global hierarchy of nationalities permeates ones sense of security and vulnerability.' This condition of classes of citizen as well as non-citizen which Mikdashi examines in Lebanon as well as one's sense of security and vulnerability in a hierarchy of nationalities is an example of the multifacitation hidden in war. For one, the scepter of war does not end in the space deemed 'war zone,' nor the period of time deemed by the belligerent as a beginning point, nor at the point of 'withdrawal.' Rather, it functions as a sanctified killing arena sentencing nations or particular populations of people to choose a life of degradation or possible death, creating a global space of degradation. In response to a critique by Human Rights Watch's Nadim Noury of an article examining how revolutionary energies can possibly be captured in neoliberal reform language, Mikdashi pointed out the lack of irony seen in situations where the United States criticizes Iraq for human rights violations and the fact that IMF policies are not seen in and of themselves to be violations, like Argentina being coerced to change its constitution or the pressing case of Honduras being subject to a coup and Model City plans which will negate Honduran labor laws. Bertha Caceres of COPINH has desced the plans as 'nefarious' especially when 'synchronized with the coup and militarization machinations' that are carrying out repression.

"These numbers, coupled with technological developments, have turned humans into what Dr. Steven Palumbi calls the world's greatest evolutionary force. Homo Sapiens has become a powerful agent of natural selection, influencing all life on earth, causing the extinction of many species, and accelerating the evolutionary change in others. Studies of human evolution have much to contribute to our understanding of how we as a single species came to exert such control over our planet's destiny. It's a truly phenomenal story of how a small apelike creature walking on two feet across the African savanna challenged nature to make stone tools. From these humble beginnings came large brained humans who instead of stone tools, have telecommunications satellites, computers and nuclear warheads at their fingertips. The human story is indeed unique and wonderful."-Robert Jurmain Professor of Antrhopolgy at San Jose State
 

"We feel we are the best choice for the future of the human race." -Gordon Robertson 700 Club May 17th 2011

NISGUA, The Network In Solidarity for Guatemala reminds people that the fight against impunity and repression is, in large part, a fight against forgetting. Last February, photojournalist James Rodriguez described what he saw as history repeating itself in Honduras, amidst a military coup of Manuel Zelaya by Proforio Lobo a General formerly trained at the School of The Americas. Rodriguez has reported on consistent fundamental issues facing communities besieged by transnational mining corporations, such as contaminated water, deforestation, deterioration of local people's health, lack of sustainable development and social conflicts (often within the greater sphere of the drug war). In this report he discusses the history of 'disappearances' in Honduras. As bombing was beginning in Libya and 45 people were killed in Pakistan, on March 17th, Guatemalan Security Forces, described by Rights Action's Annie Bird as building off the legacy of 1978 Pozote Massacre raided 14 villages, moving thousands of people off of land for international and Guatemalan President Oscar Berger's brother in law's biofuel interests. The arrest of General Lopez and Hosni Mubarak, arguments about prison and the paradox of memory (this something discussed by Morgan Meiss and understatedly understood by Guatemalans and Egyptians) withstanding, is perhaps historically fitting, but. In 1982, 1 week after conducting Operation Bright Star in the Egyptian desert with Hosni Mubarak, Ronald Reagan met in Honduras with John Negropante and Guatemalan Guatemalan President Efrain Rios Montt who was conducting an extermination campaign against Guatemala's Mayan population. Reagan asserted that Montt was getting a bad rap. Montt had risen to power amidst a military campaign grown in political response and escalation to hundreds of thousands of Guatemalans protesting and striking to increase their standing in Guatemalan society with demands like raising their minimum wage from 1 dollar per day to 5 dollars per day. Finqueros budged to 3 dollars, but being a prudently predacious with money, power and high class status armed themselves to the teeth, strengthened alliances and devised a systematic plan for brutal repression. By 1982, Montt was at the head of a project conducting scorched earth campaigns, as well as starving and torturing people to death. Today, Montt is still a congressman and has remained active in high party politics. Many architects remain not just free, but in high positions leveraging and wielding power. One leading candidate for the presidency this coming September is Otto Perez Molina, implicated in atrocity and associated with the U.S Embassy. It is within a context of 'generalized violence and repression that American, Canadian and Global corporations operate in Guatemala' and which Hillary Clinton's regional security conference in Antigua took place this past June. She called attention in the region to take heed of operations in Columbia and Mexico. That Columbia has the most internally displaced persons of any country in the world and that Mexico has seen estimates of 40,000 deaths related Drug War escalation has been discussed by Benjamin Dengl and Caitling Gaitwood.

A participant in the border humanitarian group No More Deaths expresses how this plays out along the border insightful analysis of how this play out along the border...

58. 

59. Babington, C. (2005, September 10). Some GOP legislators hit jarring notes in addressing Katrina. The Washington Post. Retrieved December 11, 2022, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2005/09/10/some-gop-legislators-hit-jarring-notes-in-addressing-katrina/685fa514-1b19-4893-934b-9200d1f4d608/

59B. Baum, D. (2016, March 31). Legalize it all, by Dan Baum. Harper's Magazine . Retrieved January 8, 2023, from https://harpers.org/archive/2016/04/legalize-it-all/

60. Schecter, A. (n.d.). Prosecutor: Pat Robertson Had Gold Deal with African Dictator. ABC News. Retrieved December 11, 2022, from https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/pat-robertsons-gold-deal-african-dictator/story?id=9749341+%3A

61. Kissinger, H. A. (2022, September 3). The pitfalls of Universal Jurisdiction. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved December 13, 2022, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/pitfalls-universal-jurisdiction

62. Basic facts on universal jurisdiction. Human Rights Watch. (2020, October 28). Retrieved December 13, 2022, from https://www.hrw.org/news/2009/10/19/basic-facts-universal-jurisdiction

63. Democratic Republic of the Congo: Economy. >> globalEDGE: Your source for Global Business Knowledge. (n.d.). Retrieved December 16, 2022, from https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/economy#:~:text=The%20Democratic%20Republic%20of%20Congo,excess%20of%20U.S.%20%2424%20trillion.

64. Fischer, S. (2005). Modernity disavowed: Haiti and the cultures of slavery in the age of Revolution. Duke Univ. Press.

65. Fagiolo, N. (2018, June 18). The race against peace: Diplomacy in the DRC. Reset DOC. Retrieved December 19, 2022, from https://www.resetdoc.org/story/race-peace-diplomacy-drc/

66. Note 65 article states congo war which America was implicated in intiating killed 10 million people +-->>  Unworthy victims: Western wars have killed four million Muslims since 1990 | Middle East Eye 

67. Majid, A. (2000). Unveiling traditions: Postcolonial islam in a polycentric world. Duke University Press.

68.  Opinion | Stalled Mission in Libya - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

69. Swaine, J. (2011, February 27). Libya: African mercenaries 'immune from prosecution for war crimes'. The Telegraph. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8350968/Libya-African-mercenaries-immune-from-prosecution-for-war-crimes.html

70. Levinson, C., & Rosenberg, M. (2011, March 17). Egypt said to arm Libya rebels. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 25, 2022, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704360404576206992835270906

71. Marinetti, F. T. (n.d.). F. T. Marinetti – the Futurist Manifesto. Genius. Retrieved December 27, 2022, from https://genius.com/F-t-marinetti-the-futurist-manifesto-annotated

72. Caruso, R. (2017, December 7). Fortune favors the bold. HuffPost. Retrieved December 27, 2022, from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fortune-favors-the-bold_b_12200132

73. Germany and the Next War. Germany and the next war, Bernhardi. (n.d.). Retrieved December 28, 2022, from http://www.gwpda.org/comment/bernhardi.html

74. Speech to U.S. troops in Afghanistan. C-SPAN. (n.d.). Retrieved December 28, 2022, from https://www.c-span.org/video/?296883-1%2Fspeech-us-troops-afghanistan

75. Is U.S. Winning in Afghanistan? Gates and Petraeus Won't Say - ABC News (go.com) This is the interview but not the actual article im looking for

76. Joya, M. (2011, March 30). Kill teams in Afghanistan: The truth | malalai joya. The Guardian. Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/mar/30/kill-team-photos-afghanistan-us

77. 

78. World 3.0. Conflict resolutions and world security solutions. (n.d.). Retrieved December 30, 2022, from https://www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/page/world_3.0

79. Sherlock, R., & al-Arian, L. (2018, March 21). Migrants captured in Libya say they end up sold as slaves. NPR. Retrieved January 5, 2023, from https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/03/21/595497429/migrants-passing-through-libya-could-end-up-being-sold-as-slaves

80. Trump, D., & Shiflett, D. (2000). The america we deserve. Renaissance Books.

NY Times Article about Ad inNY that produced voices in head of passerby:

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/09/nyregion/thecity/09ligh.html

Washington Post article about Embassy attacks:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/was-a-spys-parkinsons-disease-caused-by-a-secret-microwave-weapon-attack/2017/11/26/d5d530e0-c3f5-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?fbclid=IwAR0FrJ0vnSk_aktr6ErK4C5zcapoIAqr9_9T8ru9HKk66vPsjmCP8umyrJ4&noredirect=on 

Washington Post Article dated 1/14/07 https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399.html

https://science.dodlive.mil/2010/09/01/remote-control-of-brain-activity-using-ultrasound/?fbclid=IwAR20BscLhwBS0J8B7_Q6T9XCOV7l9vxpDs4Hux76ez_pv1PUhF9813PTKow

CNN Article “get used to it:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/29/tech/innovation/bone-conduction-get-used/index.html

60 Minutes MRI Nov 24 2019:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/functional-magnetic-resonance-imaging-computer-analysis-read-thoughts-60-minutes-2019-11-24/?fbclid=IwAR0bDnk2I-H3fN2bmChDppsARlondOlLBn8ZtxEQ_gtK4Ny2Lw_KPx3Bn9w