Chapter 1 rough draft update

The Itty Bitty Writer with Schizophrenia: I Am Sane and These Are Some of My Thoughts.

Duplicity and Manipulation: Culterica's Game of Parameters.

Phased Revelation and operations, War as Cultural Production with Hidden Multifacetation

Preface

Now at midnight all the agents
And the superhuman crew
Come out and round up everyone
That knows more than they do…

From bob Dylan’s Desolation Row

Jon Stewart announced in January of 2024 that he was returning to the Daily Show. I’m kind of glad about this. I have some critique of the way the show delivers news or acts as a news source for much of the country because it results in us all collectively laughing at atrocity and that which we shouldn't tolerate. Though, I guess there is some levity necessary for the human and social condition to alleviate pressure and make sure we don't act stupidly in opposition to atrocity. There is a lot happening on an organized covert level in this country. What is clear is that something is happening in this world which packaged history doesn’t explain or reveal nor journalism. I delve into a few aspects of this reality in this book and in some cases share my thoughts, speculation or educated guess as to what is happening. Acknowledging this reality has gotten me diagnosed with a Schizoid Affective Disorder. I don’t really even know the proper diagnosis, but I’m treated like a “Paranoid Schizophrenic.”

I believe that I have experienced Schizophrenia my whole life as far as I can remember, but it took a turn in a very intense and recognizable way right around the time my grandmother died when I was 25.  However, it had been an observable reality for me when I was 23 or 24 years old as well. For instance, I had always received messages in movies and I watched the movie Inception at 24 and the main character’s name was Dom (my name) and he was on the run from corporations with his dreams hacked and such. I currently experience some sort of dream frequency, which I don’t know if I am subject to highly advanced corporate technology, digital realities, parallel universes or some crazy intergalactic frequency and technology. As I will discuss in a later chapter and in this preface, in April of 2011 I was threatened by 2 women identifying themselves as police officers in a coffee shop after leaving my grandmother’s hospital and while I was reading a book called Unveiling Traditions by Anour Majid at a Starbucks in San Fernando. The women used a tactic I will discuss later called Directed Conversation and said I had “crossed the line” and that they “F**k people up when they least suspect it.” 3 days later, I was attacked on the highway while heading to a linguistics class at LA Valley College. The date of this attack was my Grandpa John’s death date, April 13^th. My grandmother Beatrice’s passing a few months later made me question my community and the threats from police and hostility from people made me question it as well.

We live in a very nice community in Santa Clarita, California. However, sometimes in experiencing schizophrenia, I am reminded of underhanded occurrences that I have experienced while here. I was a teenager during an effort to run my dad out of his job, which had very strong suspicious indications of it being a retaliation effort for hiring Gloria Alred as an attorney. Some weeks are filled with creepy looking people and angry people everywhere I go. However, most of the time, people are generally happy and pleasant. We’ve had a few weird neighbors, including one down the street who yelled “faggot!” at me for no reason after my recognition of organized stalking after a trip to San Francisco, during which a second staged car accident took place on the highway. Another neighbor threatened to smash our camper’s windows if we parked on the street again. So, I am scared of the medical system here to be frank. The nurse that took care of my grandma at the local hospital before her death had a tattoo of the mercenary group Blackwater and the doctor they removed from her case said the hospital was run by Nazis. Those were his exact words. It seems very dismissive if I don't think of that as relevant to my extended time or our extended time going forward.

 I sometimes look at towns in articles around the country and wonder are they different than Southern California? And is that a good or a bad thing for schizophrenia? Some towns across the country which maybe seem like they could be nice communities and are architecturally or naturally pretty are Frederick and Columbia, Maryland, Ann Arbor Michigan, or Salt Lake City Utah. For Utah, I'm a little weary of someplace where religion is intertwined into the governing and for the other I’m weary of the idea of being an outsider to some degree versus some dominant group. I like California that way because it seems pretty inclusive and openminded and of course has great entertainment and natural oasis galore. What I’ve learned is that my experience with schizophrenia may have some differences due to geography even if people say it won’t, but it could be worse elsewhere also or it could be better or the same. No matter where you are, it’s hard to find community when you experience schizophrenia. So, I use social media to formulate and release my thoughts. I personally think the toxicity in society and on social media is designed and deliberate so that people don’t form communities and share ideas and information. I think social media is a bit like a modern behavior or controlled grafitti for people who are sort of feeling not part of regular society or fitting into society. Maybe this isn’t always the case, but I think sometimes it is. I guess in some respects, it’s the opposite in that people are trying to be accepted and validated too, but I suppose that is a characteristic of graffiti too. This book is sort of my personal graffiti in controlled book format.

One form of the controlled toxicity you find in society I think is designed to make the youth of society form into new persons or almost a social engineering or chiseling of the people that the powerful seat holders want them to become. These seats are often, though not totally, where elders reside.  In the nomenclature of Mind Control programs, this is called the Monarch Butterfly programming. The idea is that you transform after the process, governed by the Monarch controllers. There is often the idea thrown around in media and society and imparted on people and youth, that they must ‘grow’ into another person or be challenged and put through trials and tribulations to achieve some master set of growth. It is an old human idea that manifests in many religions and social structures. I personally feel this whole "growth" thing that all these people tell the youth to do or harass them to make them "grow" is a big scam in the way of not valuing them as already themselves, a full human being deserving respect and dignity. This scam of ‘growth’ is a process by which to indignify people and place others on pedestal with outstretched power over other people’s lives. This is why youth largely get exploited and manipulated. I think it’s all chalked up to a "growth process" by some of the tweaked elders and peers of our society. One is reminded of Pink Floyd’s Brick in The Wall song. And this isn’t to totally discount the idea of growth in a being or person, but rather to point out how it is utilized to diminish the personhood of the youth and the experience or gnosis that comes with being a human of any age. I’m not trying to declare disrespectful retaliation against elders or peers or discount wisdom of an elder or peer, and I do in fact think the youth owe the elders of society some amount of respect, service and monetary expenditure for their experience in time and knowledge and dues for their lives. Yet there needs to be some acknowledgement that abuse of youth in effort to impart wisdom through ‘growth’ is a scam and that this minimizes their human experience and gnosis.

 A similar thing happens with people experiencing schizophrenia. They are relegated to the realm of ‘unable to discern reality.’ Their social standing and experience are devalued, diminished and erased in the council of social happenings. What occurs almost naturally in the system, to youth and in generation wars to all sides, is returned to just about anyone by way of a schizophrenic experience. Of course, this is justified to the distributors of abuse by the content the schizophrenic mind produces in effort to make the person experiencing schizophrenia “grow.” And supposedly this makes society grow. I was in my youth during the onset of my schizophrenia and it changed the trajectory of my personhood and the way I fit socially in society or my social standing.  When you are experiencing schizophrenia, society destroys your life and then acts like what they did was nothing more than a goofy tongue in cheek joke. They do this laughing and act as if they have performed some favor for you. Furthermore, they use this notion or big lie that they are performing you a favor, to make society believe that the schizophrenic actually owes society a debt to be paid in production. Everyday the schizophrenic is made to pay in some action, state of being, or mental information so that people won’t get harmed or for their own sanity.

In schizophrenia, you pay a daily debt for your sanity. I borrow in part from the gnostics and they have an idea that there is a lesser deity called the Demiurge which created earth’s reality and from what I understand, the physical world goes largely by the rules of a deranged or fool of a deity, but gnostics hold that the higher deity, I guess often referred to as the goddess Sophia, exists in the cosmos which is much saner. Perhaps this debt put on people experiencing schizophrenia is actually an example or manifestation of that lower deity. I’ll never understand how there is so much literature in the health industry and medical industry about how stress is a killer and yet people still seem to think it’s acceptable to create stress for people in their lives at all, let alone on a continuous basis.

I came to the realization while writing this book that if I label myself to others or describe myself, I am an itty bitty writer who experiences Schizophrenia. I realize now why people like to say they experience homelessness or are a person and not call themselves 'disabled' and such. I don't need to be dismissed in my experience as just 'diseased' or 'genetically inferior,’ but I do understand that I am still actually experiencing schizophrenia. It is a reality to be experienced. And much of the experience can be explained by coming into contact with systems or operations using modern or advanced technology. I am just a one time semi activist. I am now a brain damaged author, finishing this book about surveillance, technology in society, and psychological operations. One thing that is happening in our democracy is that people aren't comfortable sharing what they think and feel about various ideas and events or issues. This is partly because everything is made polarizing and consequential by people who do like to discuss. Part of this uncomfortableness in openly being honest about how one feels is that workplaces are tied into Stasi networks and can penalize people for harboring a belief, thought or opinion. This can happen even if people state their belief, thought or opinion in the confines of their house.

In declaring that I experience schizophrenia I should point out that it is like coookooo coco brains stuff. Not to make light of the effect on others, but I experience the whole big shebang. As with the Comedy Central behavior mentioned in the beginning of this preface, I too maintain some levity as I am not in charge of deciding what happens and this helps me keep my sanity through general irreverence for society’s silent behavior and the powerful’s irresponsibility. I experience people hate stalking me and obsessive love stalking me everywhere I go trying to drive me crazy. Massive amounts of surveillance, perhaps even competing organizations surveilling each’s activity. An organization broadcasting my thoughts to the world. Natural disasters in response to drinking alcohol, my thoughts or eating.  Politicians mimicking me, actors and actresses sending coded messages in movies that predict my life and friends’ and family’s lives going back decades and I have voices in my head on and off for a decade or more. Pretty much the whole world sends me back feedback and makes me responsible for everything that goes on in the world based on totally arbitrary things I do. Wars are started to try and affect me in response to my thought or activity. I don’t experience the voices so much with the medication as now it comes in about 1 month bouts once or twice a year as opposed to the 6 year straight sequence I experienced during the 2010s. I think this is a coordinated racket and I've written this book about experiencing schizophrenia that I hope will contribute to research and historical documentation of how schizophrenia should not relegate the schizophrenic to social disregard and is actually explained by operations and systems utilizing modern technology or highly advanced technology. So I guess I wrote this book for history, research and self-soothing to some degree, perhaps even as a defense of my sanity and peace in my mind, my world and the world at large. It’s unclear to me that is the aim of the people conducting reality. Though sometimes I hope so.

Some of the narrative controllers of whatever is happening in society are TV Networks. In 2023, CNN ran a segment in which two reporters from CNN discussed how The New York Times published an article describing Havana Syndrome victims hearing voices in their heads. CNN reported that this likely was produced by a weapon. Yet CNN still promotes false narratives of "tinfoil hat" tropes without correcting the public record that technology and weapons to target people's brains is wide spread. Does one ignore the CNN story, dipping their toe in the water of technology induced voice hearing by insinuating weapons caused Havanah Syndrome Victims to hear voices in their heads? Or rather, does one ignore the reality CNN paints a false narrative about with “tin foil hat” tropes used over and over again in their other reporting? A real society with any sort of journalism would have segwayed to reports by Nils Melzer the former Special Rapporteur on Torture at the United Nations and his report that governments around the world were engaging in psychological torture using highly advanced Cybertechnologies.

In a real reckoning with their own reporting, CNN would have to admit that voice hearing is evidence of extra carricular activity or militant activity surrounding schizophrenics who hear voices. This ignorance of reality, even a reported reality that has no effective bearing on the rest of the year’s broadcasts according and narrative according to CNN’s actions, happens with an apparent hidden technological advancement being demonstrated in our skies as well. I don't know what is happening, but we are living in a society in which there are UFOs flying all over the sky, everyone sees them and everyone knows about them. They are even discussed on snippets on the news and even by congress and the Pentagon, but there is like no wider curiosity apparent or discussion about the greater implications of apparent high tech spacefaring or interdimensional travel, or possibly antigravity machines that dates back in eyewitness reported accounts to the 1940s and perhaps even thousands of years. It’s like something we aren't allowed to talk about and furthermore, in other respects, its completely ignored as a reality. Additionally, there are demonstrative ways to read our minds. Facebook is getting mind reading wristbands. Workplaces are implementing brain monitoring. And there also seems to be a lack of allowance for people to talk about it or demonstrate or practice curiosity in how that is trudging along or should trudge along in society. As far back as 1960 there was a vice presidential Candidate named Daniel Fry who said he was communicated with by a "mothership" above the earth telepathically and had his mind read. Now how much of that is a true story? And how much of that is a creative story based on some sort of reality?

In his book UFO: The Inside Story of the Us Government's Search for Alien Life Here--And Out There, author Garret M. Graff points out that Gorillas were thought to be a myth in the West until 1847. So it seems like the authority with which people speak about the "myths" of Aliens, UFOs or Time Travel and in my opinion, Schizophrenia as an inability to recognize reality and as a disease, could be in fact just ignorance to another aspect of reality. This type of ignorance is something which humans have demonstrated throughout time.

Humans are an organized, plan-centric species. The America Revolution was conducted by conspiracists and established a culture of conspiracists to dominate America and battle the British Empire and eventually would join with that country and others around the world in its own sort of Empire. You can call me an Organizational Theorist, I’m not a “conspiracy theorist.” I’m an experienced subject and witness of a conspiracy with appropriate cognition. I say that this conspiracy is just organized human behavior. This cognition, which I will share more at the end of the book, caused a mind reading agency within the global intelligence networks of the world to experiment with my brain. I submit some basics of my cognition below in this preface to give the reader an idea about why I was possibly subjected to brain experimentation research by this type of American Empire which may in fact function as a front for placement in a Galactic Federation for all I know:

Example of my thoughts generating experimental interest.

We need to maximize this Earth's lifespan and maintain equilibrium or ecological health and also we need to explore space and make relations with other planets and species for when Earth is no longer habitable, whether by our own mismanagement of the planet or by natural causes of the Universe’s time clock like the moon getting too far away, the death of the sun, colliding galaxies or the big freeze that is coming in this universe. Any of these or other scenarios, some inevitable, makes our escape to another planet, another galaxy or a parallel universe necessary for our survival. This likely means we need to enhance ourselves culturally and spiritually as a Civilization. And we need knowledge of what the termed “breakaway civilization” is doing and perhaps simultaneously or beforehand, we need to seriously abandon this violent competition-based order of the world where everybody in the world is atomized, competing with each other for their basic survival and needs to the point of nuclear annihilation or excessive expenditure of earth’s resources and the trashing of our habitat. Because humans are a very plan-centric and organized species, as of this writing I’m of the mind that it’s time we use our brain capacities to develop systems that are collaborative and take care of people’s mental and physical health and dignity while relying on our better motivations and helping us develop our better motivations, like desiring to be in harmony, to contribute, to create, to be free and to love. We can incorporate a confluence of these desires and others. We need to exercise these aspects of our species and develop civilization along these lines, rather than develop base competitive violence systems of deprivation while trashing the planet for our domination by a few thousand rich people. It's funny, yet tragic, to live in a militarized society which admires institutions who have the mantra "leave no man behind" and then see hundreds of thousands homeless or millions without health care.

It’s often said in the Capitalist American world that capitalism functions better than socialism for the masses. Yet the word socialism has different meanings to different people, like for some Social Security is socialism in the United States, its hard to argue against social security being better than 1920s American society. In some respects, it’s hard to argue that American capitalism functions better for the masses than Scandinavian social democracies, which also get called socialist because of their mixed economies, with life and death access to healthcare being universal in those countries versus 33 million plus humans without health care in the United States. I should iterate here that I am a social democrat in my personal idea about what seems to be most functional and a reasonable step to take with consensus probability between the two polarities of accellerationists on the left and right. I am most certainly not for dystopian civil war that seems to be where each polarity pushes us without compromise and consensus. One reason for socialist or more outright socialist countries not functioning in the global system on the same level as Capitalist countries is, in part, due to the fact that the world is run by greedy psychos who pit armies and whole economic systems and societies against the functioning of the socialist country that has tried to buck the world order. But even taking the functioning of Capitalist countries to be superior on its face, the fact that socialist societies have an objective or intention of taking care of everyone in the society makes it halfway there in the way of a functioning world order for humanity as the necessary modification can exist as a possibility with a societal intention to benefit everyone or take care of everyone. Capitalist societies, on the other hand, will likely never get to the point of taking care of everyone because the intention or objective of a capitalist society is to allow the opportunity for the masses to compete with each other for resources at the behest of a few thousand rich people who pull the strings and get to decide who ‘makes it' and who doesn’t. The capitalist world order is one in which the losers exist out of propagandized mind and it is intentional for some people to lose and some people to win.

Functionally, capitalism may in the current cultural, political and spiritual climate of earth perform better for some people or for more people than a rogue socialist country, but it will never be modified to the point of universality in taking care of all its inhabitants by people who believe in its intention to pit people in competition for opportunities to gain subsistence so basically a few thousand people can accumulate extreme vast wealth.   

I have my beliefs that we need to go to a new system or civilization that takes into account successes of old and does away with failures of old and develops better human motivations than fear of deprivation that is based on violence and competition and instead is one that protects equilibrium and earth’s environment. I also think the Breakaway civilization should be known about or that we need to as a whole humanity improve our lot so that the Universe won't retaliate against crazy free wheeling humanity in the future. However,  I'm under no illusions that it will happen. So I don’t fault anyone’s avenue for obtaining money which is the necessary token we need to live in this civilization so long as it doesn’t harm others and you can’t avoid it honestly. I just want to make a life under this system we have best I can. Its kind of like

"This is the song that never ends.

It just goes on and on my friends.

Some people started singing it not knowing what it was

 and they'll just keep on singing it forever just because"

Journalist Caitlin Johnstone writes that for the world to survive or humanity to survive,  we need to create a utopian civilization or perish. For centuries, the retort to people trying to create a better world and political or economic systems has always been “you are unrealistic” and that “you dream of Utopia.” And while Johnstone cites the hard to ignore reality that we either create a Utopian civilization or perish as a species, it makes me think that politicians and powerful people basically do live in little warped Utopias instead of creating universal actual utopias for us all to live in. The example I’d cite is Washington DC with its nearby historical slave plantations and its organized wealthy comfortable spaces compared to the rest of the country. Or take for instance an occasional public bathroom that’s been cleaned when you have to pee. Is it not utopian for me to piss in a cleaned bathroom when I am miles from my house in some random place? But there was a cost for that. Quite possibly an immigrant cleaned it and did so on minimal wage living in poverty, possibly traveling home to a slummy neighborhood without benefits or health insurance or maybe even without democratic or human rights. My little warped utopia of periodic or occasional relieved piss bliss. Nobody says this is unrealistic when we as bathroom users occasionally experience this rather than an actual utopia in which someone is appropriately benefitted for uncomfortable job or their hazardous labor or as a community, we share responsibility perhaps for this public benefit or public health contribution or many times a business courtesy.

Maybe in trying to appeal to Americana population we should draw attention to founding fathers’ brains were they transplanted to today and conditioned by modern knowledge that they’d want to revolutionize the world in practice or institutionally to deal with modern problems, reject old order and examine past mistakes. On the wall of the Memorial of an author of the Declaration of Independence is Thomas Jefferson’s writing, On the Northeast Portico it quotes Jefferson as saying:

"I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as a civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."

I think he may have seen 250 years as infrequent.

Jefferson also wrote of a pursuit of happiness and there is often a question asked in our society: Are we obsessed with being happy or with happiness? I don’t really think there is an obsession with it. I think there is an obsession with "being happy amidst psychopathy and dystopia" which is unhealthy, but we should be trying to keep ourselves and everyone happy. It should be a collective goal and individual goal or at least 1 of our collective goals as part of an effort to achieve utopia, but sometimes you need other emotions to burrow your way to fulfillment, which makes people happy in the end.

The right is very good at creating these things that are symbolic representations of freedom in people's minds, but don’t really mean freedom at all or really have any correlation to enhancing freedom in a life. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, for instance, likes to invoke Gas, Guns, Beef and Christianity or the flag. None of these things actually is freedom.

Guns kill and create dangerous unsafe anxiety for communities. People can’t walk down the street at night unless they are ready to get into a shootout. They are used to assassinate and threaten democratic governments. That’s not freedom.

Gas is a tax that chokes the world and contributes to death of the planet. It is solidified as a powerful industry tied into war and kept as a behemoth industry in charge by invention secrecy act of 1951 which confiscates any other ideas challenging status quo industries. This is not freedom and it is going to be be limiting freedom further as sustainability is challenge.

Beef throws cows into factory slaughter houses and resigns people to brutal work environments damaging and traumatizing them and ends life early with heart disease contributes to ecocide. This is not freedom.

Christianity convinces people to limit women's freedom and life stature creating controlling theocracies. This is not freedom.

The flag gets used to wrap tyrannical activity and whole sale wars which the founder of the country James Madison said was the biggest threat to freedom in existenc. This is not freedom.

These things and symbols they use, get used to limit discussion on how to best increase freedom in people’s lives. Is there room for these things in a freedom loving society? I think maybe in some cases yes and there are ways in which some things like Christianity can enhance freedom by valuing people as worthy and children of god or what not, but they are not emblematic and in some ways are contradictory to a free society Ted Cruz invokes beef for instance to point out an existential crisis threatening freedom that of beef restriction at the hands of a Kamala Harris Administration. Now I’m not for beef restriction at this time, but it and the rest of these things are not lines I would draw in the sand and say freedom ends and begins here. I actually eat beef and find carne asada or California burritos are my favorite thing to eat taste wise, but I question their environmental impact and my heart health as well as the morality of factory farms which are rather disgusting things, so there are reasons to regulate the industry and I don’t think it would be a big deal toward my freedom. It is like the freedom to smoke. People that want to make that the issue with which we talk about the idea of freedom likely don’t want the idea of freedom explored.

How about guarantee a house? or economic means to purchase experiences or free time? How’s about not starting at zero or debt for people who aren’t wealthy in a capitalist system and have a citizen’s wage or not make life so consequential with various punitive punishments for failing? What about editing our 40 hour work week system which is often greater for people and hasn’t been updated in a hundred years? Ted cruz and co like to talk graphically about a woman's decision to bear life, yet disregard war and the graphic nature of definitive mass murder and in fact wrap the flag around it as if that is harbinger for freedom. Its a weird freedom he cherishes. ANd I'm not sure how much of it can be determined to be freedom at all.

As far as creating a new system or civilization that takes into account successes and failures of old and current system, in some respects, this mixture of systems or wedding of systems does take place in the world. China for instance functions like a capitalist economy, yet under direction of a communist political party. I’m not experienced or educated enough to say they should be modeled upon, but I just point out that they have had some success wedding different systems and utilizing what works or successes of different systems. This just shows that hybrid ideas are already taking place. It is widely acknowledged that China raised incredible millions out of poverty operating this way.

One problem people have with China’s system is that of control. People have to know that you aren't coming from a place of manipulation, control and hostility to be open to developing rapport and interpersonal relationships or political relationships. Putting in effort to be respectful and going with the flow in case of interpersonal relationships or in the case of politics to find common ground and accepting people for who they are can contribute to that reality. There are currently University level studies which make the claim that the Conservative brain and liberal brain have different biological qualities. This perhaps can lead us down a path of questioning what this is all about civilization, intellect, politics, social structures. Perhaps America is an experiment created by experimentees.

For the sake of study I divided up the whole annual income in the United States and if you divided that equally among all adults over 18 years old it’d be 100 thousand dollars. So like conceivably just take one household, where between 3 people it is at about 200 thousand. If they were making 100k each and working or retired, they’d be at 300 thousand. So maybe individually one might lose, but they’d have retirement and  if they functioned collectively they’d be at 300 thousand as opposed to household income of 200 thousand. Now I think other thoughts like could you keep production creatively under a collective egalitarian system? I don’t know. Also, lets say you conceivably get people to buy into equality or egalitarianism (which they are in no manner there at the moment in the capitalist or liberal democratic world) in an egalitarian system, I don’t know how you synthesize equality among people in different towns and cities. Like towns and cities aren’t equal and different environments aren’t equal, people’s desires aren’t equal. People will want to all live next to the ocean so how do you decide who gets to do that? Maybe that’s besides the point and you just try to create as much equality as you can the best you can, but it would be undermining the tenets of the society just by being on an unequal earth.

While I’m not personally for egalitarianism because I don’t think you can gain consensus and it would create conflict at this time. I am for social democracy as opposed to socialism that takes over the means of production 1.The state is not currently capable of taking over the means of production. It hasn’t been done in the United States since World War 2 and even then it was a more a combination of fascism and socialism to combat fascism. 2. State rule of production does not have consensus possibility I don’t think. And 3. It seems to be less successful than social democracy and I like it more. Clearly there’s room for bridging the wealth gap in our civilization. Republicans were so embarrassed that Trickle down was seen as a giant scam and farce, one of the biggest failures in the country’s history, that they put up Trump a billionaire buffoon drawing attention to immigrants as scapegoats so they could continue the practice of pilfering wealth and siphoning it toward the top 1 percent. It was their only play and they have gone all in on it. They had to find a problem and paint the bottom of society as the real problem. It is sick and frankly people supporting Trump on immigration are either a calculated sick people with trump or they are being fooled.

Status quo in immigration and national boundaries runs the risk of a false flag terror attack where normal immigrants will be scapegoated and Nazi moves get exaggerated in this country. This is another reason why I am for international cooperation and plans to unify or build up western hemisphere which maybe if people get on board with it will result in political integration among Spanish and English speaking world.

I am for greater political integration in the world like was dreamt up in the United Nations or European Union and what was floated in North American Union idea for a while. I think the problems of war, climate calamities, transnational gangs, economic exploitation, borderless wealth reach and a hierarchy of nationalities could be alleviated by political integration. To be a refugee or migrant I think is the inevitability of all intelligent life and civilizations in the Universe including us humans, so we might as well be open to this behavior culturally as a civilization because we are going to need the favor in the future when we go off world.

 I was reminded of the black taxi tour I took in Belfast. I thought this tour was very educational. If the reader doesn’t know there was a time in Ireland during the 20^th century where there was a war fought and terrorism used by Irish Catholics to fight against oppression by the British in Northern Ireland. The black Taxi tour takes an educational tour of the current neighborhoods that were segregated and violently at odds with each other in the past. Our driver had a more Irish catholic tinge, but told both sides. I am someone who is not religious now, but was raised catholic and I am 29 percent Irish in my DNA as well as 6 percent British and 15 percent Scottish. As an American as well, I am sort of wondering if the residual division in Ireland is a bit like the civil war is here in the States and people never left. It seems like there are ancient divisions or something present in these conflicts. I know we are talking decades removed, but it was crazy to see the walls separating neighborhoods still today and the residual animosity present with the pictures of the British bonfire towers that take place every July burning Irish regalia and such. I enjoy visiting Ireland and Britain and I enjoy both peoples and it seems that what is present still to some degree in Belfast is not present in everyone. I don't have attached trauma to this history like others do minus stories of my ancestors that predate immigrating to America in the 19^th century. It seems though that division helps certain segments of the society including two different churches and people who would like antagonisms for manipulative purposes like hoarding wealth. As an American, I think wouldn’t it be great if the English speaking world were politically integrated? But I guess everyone likes to have their neighborhood preserved in character and such.

Like with the conflict of Capitalism vs socialism or what we can learn in generality with any political conflict such as the Troubles of Ireland,  you certainly can’t run any society with half the population in a death match against the other population or each other and undermining efforts to make any sort of system or civilization work. So, without compromise and consensus any civilization going forward will fail in large ways. All this being said, the tenets of American society are a real problem, not just Politicians or corporations, but the fact that we have all been made subjects competing with each other for resources and approval of uber rich people in effort to accumulate more wealth and power for rich people. I’m talking the uber rich who control capital in the hundreds of millions and definitely those controlling billions or more. They largely dictate the economy. I suppose there’s some democratic control through consumer choice, but in the scheme of things we are all pushed around by bigger fish.

For this reason, I find a compromise to some of the problems we face is to care about the dignity of all and provide basic necessities of people which allow them the freedom to accumulate more through ownership or  work for additional activities. I find there can be ample incentive to make a system work that way and balance some power between capital and labor.  But just take the concept of freedom and liberty, central to the American “experiment” or political project. How free is a population in poverty with the threat of deprivation or compelled labor, often with little choice in the matter even though choice is heralded as a supreme benefit of the system? Currently, politicians in the Republican Political party are supposing that Americans should retire at 70 years old. I personally think we should work 4-6 hour days like 4 days a week or 30 hrs a week or so and share responsibilities and work load to make a civilization function. I don't think we are supposed to be exhausted, stressed and unhealthy as humans from our contributions, whether it be to our bank account, or to society and civilization. It seems unnatural to me to continue such a system in such a way. I’m still at such an age where I can do it since I have to and I can still enjoy work and life, but it seems rather obvious that humans need to develop more of a balance to work of society and free time or healthy living.

One possible solution to this in America could be Universal Basic Income. I became aware sometime in my early 20s of the fact that certain countries in Scandinavia were either using or testing Universal Basic Income or citizen’s wage. This appealed to me because I thought that this with health care and housing development or building could alleviate conflict between businesses and Unions. If we take care of housing, health care and have a UBI as a society, it could afford people to work for small businesses who then in turn would have to be quality places instead of using deprivation and total poverty or homelessness as a coercive backdrop. People would be more free to pursue greater riches or live with basic necessities. It would also alleviate extreme poverty. Possibly, unions would be less necessary with that bargaining position. I think businesses would have to make concessions even without unionization in such a scenario. You wouldn't necessarily need to have so high a minimum wage either which would help small businesses and businesses wouldn't need to pay the health insurance.

But this problem is representative of a greater problem. There needs to be acknowledgement in our politics of the way our current political and economic system pits us all into different camps with different interests or that it is just basically incohesive. For instance, its not in a homeowner's interest for property values to fall and many rely on their house ownership to bankroll their retirement. Meanwhile, it is in the interest of the other half of the population for property values to fall so that they can get into the ownership realm. A question should be asked is this division an accidental oversight to the world created long ago or is it an ancient systematic deliberate mechanism to keep us divided? If I am correct in my suspicion, I think that high end Industrial capitalists or political organizations control crime and violence and deteriorate neighborhoods so that people or workers are even more desperate and cutthroat trying to get money to move to nicer safer neighborhoods. Not building housing is done for the same basic reason.

Crime may lower property or cost in small ways or in small geographical locations relative to elsewhere, but across the whole and its ultimate effect is that it makes everyone more desperate and in competition for jobs, security and community or niceties. So it raises property and rent on a macroscale. It creates disunion which makes the masses less unified in demanding privileges and rights like housing healthcare jobs income or recreation and luxuries.

 Individual liberty happens on a spectrum or to particular degrees. A dead planet is also pretty limiting in the degree to which humanity will experience liberty and freedom in the future or now with ill health affects or climate calamities. The degree to which individual liberty needs to be curtailed in order to take care of the planet is negligible for most people in the future if we act in sound judgment. Infrastructure that uses renewables? Limiting a billionaires share of the economic and political power over others? Cultural and political laws to regulate for Regenerative farming versus corporate farming? Organic versus cancer causing Pesticides? What is the liberty of a corporation or person being curtailed verses the liberty of humanity on the whole in these regards? Electric cars or hidden technology by the secret 1950s Invention Secrecy National Security act? Individual liberty is curtailed by poverty or lack of opportunity or market or profit over people behavior as well as by ideas of communism and green dictatorships. There are forces limiting the degree of liberty that get wrapped up in a Freedom USA Flag as well.

The anarchist line of thought is that we don't need a state and that people can freely associate and have open access to resources to build a house or form trade partnership or community I guess. But who's going to educate everyone in the world or any people into valuing land, environment and others to share the resources responsibly if not a State? Seems one is necessary at this time and to me the lack of or availing oneself to start respecting the idea of a State having a role in aiding humanity needs to happen if the state can ever function better. The free market puts people in the street and the state houses them so in that instance I like the state. The retort will be the state aids the idea of private property and bars people from accessing and associating to meet their needs. But then I ask well should we all just be allowed to cut down forests on the whim of individuals or groups with no control over that process? How will you determine how to use best practices and sustainable practices if there is no state educating people to value that idea or practice?

The state is needed because we don't in fact live in a Utopia now nor is one possible right now. Now could humanity make a utopia, and do we need to? Sure. But paying a tax to a state is not utopian. It's Utopian to think corporations or everyone will magically learn how to be an unselfish person or organization or that people will organize into an anarchist society that is peaceful upon one state hierarchy leaving in one generation. So while you could call wealthy spaces little warped Utopias they are not real utopias…The Utopia of the future may include anarchical society at the forefront, but I think to get there, there needs to be a State that is pushing toward that Utopian unselfish life affirming culture. Humanity has a long way to go and it will take a unified structure on earth to push us there I believe. I guess one of the mysteries of humanity is hierarchy, it’s messiness and our messy rebellion against it quite often. What does it mean? Where does it come from? Is it in our DNA? Is it the Demiurge?  I won’t answer that in the book but I am someone who asks the question which leads to the response in the government that I write about here.

It's funny that competition is the name of the game for all of us to the point that losing means dying in our own filth on the street, but cooperation is the name of the game and is good enough among wealthy corporations price gouging and merging and consolidating monopolies all across the market and buying politicians who forgo democratic competition in elections and get selected by and large by very wealthy people with cooperating interests.

Because of this basic cognition that I share in this preface and other examples of my cognition that I share later in this book, I have been singled out in a grandiose thought experiment. In this book, I will discuss my observations of what is called “The Targeted Individual Program.” Those claiming to be subject to the program are often ridiculed in the press, when they are even acknowledged at all, as “tin foil hat” kooks.  This has been the line to dismiss people experiencing schizophrenia for nearly a century who complain of exotic or covert experimentation by the government, private organizations or intelligence agencies. The whole “tin foil hat” defense and incredulity play doesn’t really work when the former Chairman of India’s Joint Intelligence Committee is writing articles declaring that China has far advanced cognitive control weapons and “neurostrike" weapons in which he states that “common people” are the primary targets. For journalists to promote "tin foil hat," I mean It’s like saying 2+2 = 7. It is a blatant lie that cannot stand up to any sort of minimal intelligent examination of reality. Also, it’s quite clear that America is being duplicitous and manipulative. While I was writing this book, FBI Director Christopher Ray appeared on 60 Minutes and discussed China’s running a program called “Fox Hunt” in which Chinese dissidents around the world and in America are stalked, harassed and threatened with violence for opposing or being critical of the Chinese Communist Party or government officials.  I personally think China plays along because the technology, weaponry and tactics have been used in America with schizophrenics for a hundred years likely.

 In his speech before the Republican National Convention, Vice Presidential candidate and Senator, JD Vance joked about his grandma threatening to run over a drug dealer ( a child friend of her grandson) and Vance also joked about the idea of getting away with it as his grandma declared she no body would know. One thing that is happening is that there's covert warfare using vehicles as weapons. I experienced this first hand and experienced threats trying to terrorize me. It is in fact like a form of terrorism. I'm all for just using surveillance tools to respond in the sense of monitoring and tracking the culprits down and pressing charges. I may not press charges in my case were I able to track down culprits, but I think there should be a system in place to monitor this tactic.  Surveillance is the way of the world. It is done in the shadows and under the table regardless of whether we all want to pretend we are against the practice. There's shadowy groups utilizing these dirty tactics. Roadways should be monitored by satellite. We don't balk at monitoring stores so people can't steal Hello Kitty dolls, yet when lives are threatened on the highway, deliberately to terrorize, we just let it continue without bringing it into the light and responding. The tactic is a political surveillance connected tactic called "Vehicular Stallking" or Floating Box. More people die due to reckless and calculated crashes than by conventional terrorism. There needs to be public extensive surveillance by satellite of the roadways and people need to be prosecuted for threatening and reckless driving.

As I will discuss additionally later in the book people should be weary of possible false flags on micro and macro scale. as well as false flag fronts within false flag fronts. Fifth Columns are examples of this, but also could be representative of bigger Macro scale operations. Where there’s duplicity and manipulation, one should ask how deep the duplicity and manipulation goes. The flag or cause one espouses when murdering people is significant. It could evidently represent the driver of their actions or it could be the intent to paint those causes or the who or what the symbols represent in a negative light and set them up for retaliation. They could also be chess pieces.

I want to characterize myself as "Experiencing Schizophrenia" rather than "experiencing targeted individual program" because I feel there's a propaganda effort built into information or into the actual Targeted Individual program which dismisses schizophrenic experience as something not worth examining even given technological revelations as well as acknowledged widespread political or social behaviors. I also feel much of what happens in the Targeted Individual world is designed to harass people subject to the schizophrenic experience. I feel like a pawn otherwise, though I fully acknowledge it in this book that the Targeted Individual program does explain to some degree some sort of reality. We are told that to form solutions to problems one must address the problem to begin with. And solutions to Schizophrenia takes 1 percent of the population and determines that they have a chemical imbalance in their brain to be drugged rather than that they are people forming a front or in fact experiencing social behavior of political or other societies and technology intrusions upon their brain and body.

I experience the schizophrenic reality. I happen to know that some organization that is very powerful is reading my mind and interested and is in fact inside my brain and can even make my brain operate thought wise beyond my total control. They can send harassment voiced messages in other people's voices, which they do to disable me either for months but back in the day for 6 years or they can make me think thoughts in my own voice. They operate a paramilitary force of famous people and street level people, doctors, lawyers, businessman, customer service representatives, deliverymen, it is basically totally encompassing of society and people themselves can be remote controlled. This organization can be hostile and play with your sense of reality or they can be kind and jovial stroking your ego or conduct themselves in a way that they position themselves as spiritual teachers. They are basically running the government this way and may in fact be officially deployed by the government. Today this organization likes to lecture me on how to live my life, this being after they disabled and destroyed my life for over a decade. It is koo koo. Also, either this organization or another controls the weather and earth's geophysical systems. They will create natural disasters based on my daily activities and thought processes. They also will start wars, which I am uncertain of the veracity of destruction of life. I don't know at this point how much is psychological operations and how much dummies and fake explosions or controlled demolitions of countries are being conducted and how much of it is controlled violent chaos and destruction of life.

As I was writing this book I was reading the sequel to Clanlands. The first book was my favorite book I’ve read in a while. It is written by two actors, Graham MacTavish and Sam Heughan, who with Scottish buddy banter travel Scotland. Early in the Second book, MacTavish discusses the journey our ancestors might have made to send us where we are today.  In his particular case New Zealand and he discusses what would they think about people complaining about their movie selection on an airplane? I find that funny. I don’t often think about it in those terms. I usually think in terms of other humans living hardships today and I don’t like to complain about things that are just silly to complain about, but with the hostile life takeover of my life in experiencing schizophrenia and whatever the targeted individual program is, I do a fair bit of complaining about the way it ruined my life in its own unique way. I think a lot of times injustice stands because people are dismissed as complainers. I’m not meaning to complain about my life with this book, but to examine some absurdity and reality. I’m reminded of the Catholic teaching about how there’s always someone worse off than you. Or the pointing to terrible condition somebody endures to make you happy with your existence and blessings and its true I do have what are traditionally known as “blessings.” And there’s a temperance with that in both directions I think. For example, I think it can be used to condition us to accept barbarism or just minuscule unfairness or even gross unfairness. I’m struck by some of MacTavish’s sentiment, if even it was just a joke in passing writing, because I think it is a widely used cudgel by others. For instance, he makes a point to say our ancestors wouldn’t have much to think about veganism. And well I don’t know the totality of his attitude, but its possible or he seems to be holding onto an attitude of brutality makes a better world or people or at least lending some credence for people who clutch onto archaic ways to our detriment, if even there’s benefits to the ancient world emulation on some occasions.

I suppose there is a temperament we can call upon by remembering, either in art or print form, descriptions of the brutality of the past. Yet we are an evolving species and I am reminded of the idea which the Journalist Kaitlin Johnstone writes about that there is a development taking place with humanity where our brutality nearly wiped us all out, so we had to look inwards and try not to blow ourselves up and ascend to greater heights as a species. I think I am a fat monkey when I eat my farm raised fish which probably suffered in its pond. There’s something speaking this to me when I eat it. There’s a reminder of brutality and I’m not sure I’m meant to continue it. How important is it? I don’t know. Following this innate voice has been a little difficult with Schizophrenia. I don’t know when I am being led by an Artificial Intelligence and whether that intelligence should even be discarded. For instance, I often hear the sound of rain on my roof or outside while I am warm inside. I enjoy this sound as most people do and I actually think this sound and how we get joy out of the feeling is indicative of an innate knowing of purpose for us to build housing or shelter from the elements for us and others. I’ve had this thought ever since I was a child in school and knew of homeless people I think. I was disregarded perhaps at a young age as naïve, but this feeling and thought was a gnosis and is knowledge for humanity from the universe. Everybody has access to this type of knowledge. I hope my musing here in this book is an example for us to just use it.

What I think is that the schizophrenic is just relaying an abusive system. Even if at times the system is entertaining or there are periods where it is amusing, it is part of a greater abuse of someone's life and it often turns nasty. In my case, it is done to move chess pieces against me for being a humanist or liberal or socialist or a dissident or whistleblower or knowledge purveyor or for having a spiritual creativity. I don't like to use the terms because they are loaded but that’s the crux of the motive others have in manipulating the schizophrenic's life and abusing their existence.

Many people who are subjects or targets of counter intelligence operations discuss how they are slandered amongst the intelligence agencies and then in society by fusion center operations designed to turn associates, friends and family away from the target, so that they will become isolated. I have no way of knowing if any of this happened in my case, but I do know that the controllers in my case did try to paint me with certain characteristics to justify their abuse of me by security personnel and then would let me know they were doing so. At one point in my counter intelligence targeting it became clear that controllers were painting me as a racist who had to be stopped. It is unclear how serious of an accusation they were making. But they were policing me as if I was racist who wanted to stoke white supremacist groups.

 I believe that they were combatting political speech I made during the Libyan Bombings. I posted on social media during the Libyan Bombings, which resulted in intense gang-stalking harassment, that War Keeps Order for Cannibal System. I clearly had white general/officer on the picture to indicate that white people are cannibals to remind that slave masters used to tell stories about themselves as cannibals to terrorize slaves, but they pass propaganda to characterize others that way as well. I was referencing the Rolling Stone article, which practically showcased a story of U.S soldiers cutting up an Afghan casualty, chopping off his fingers among other gruesome mutilations.  Meanwhile the psyops managers sit back and also play to another audience and show radical Muslims as cannibals when they commit atrocities. Both sides keep committing atrocities, and then the other side sees the age old cannibal people that they have to civilize with their civilization or religion and other cultural behaviors as with old propaganda. It is the same colonial system. And then I was alluding to a system which produces homeless veterans as well and to a system in which we profit off misery and eat eachother up in competitive economy with opposing interests for the public good and individual good. But this was utilized to provide feedback as if I was promoting white Supremacy, which is the opposite of what I was saying. It was also about myself as a writer etc and about surveillance, but it was interpretive. Finally, it was to make reference to the way propaganda has different meanings to different audiences by design. It was done to make commentary on violence perpetuated amongst opposing races of people. But I clearly made it acknowledging it was analyzing a perspective of Americans as a Caucasian or European American

While the system may be a cannibal system and we eat each other up, propagandists have been also characterizing us all as rather useless deadweight unless we create some value for rich people. So while I think there can be some scope in which this is an element to an economy. This is a bizarre ultimate measuring of human beings and their value. My family and I used to want to start the We Party, but since politics are run by wealthy elitist interests in both political parties or the uber talented and system is what it is like in theory it rewards talented hard workers, which is not necessarily a bad thing because it incentivizes quality and beauty in production and art for one thing, yet incentivizes over expenditure of energy and life in worklife on the other hand.  I think but maybe the rest of us need a Party of the Worthless for what Henry Kissinger used to call the Useless Eaters. Our interests deserve representation in this thing we call democracy. I guess if the worthless have any amount of success, maybe we can rebrand as the "Party of the Worthy." In reality it should start at worthy. Perhaps this populist idea can take on a life of its own or get infiltrated and undermined or redirected to disparate ends or cause disdainful ignorant backlash or unnecessary conflict. I’m basically half joking here. However I seriously do think that often, what our system of hoards of wealth among the richest tiny fraction does is brainwash and reward the talented among us to value work above all else, then provide little support in a job training or environment or monetary expenditure to everyone on the whole and even will actively try to undermine us and drive us crazy. Then it will pass off the dysfunction of the system as just due to the lack of healthy work ethic and idiocy of the rest of us. Schizophrenia is one manifestation of this practice.

One aspect of schizophrenia is a determination by a psychiatrist that the schizophrenic cannot determine what is real versus what is fake. It is a devaluing of their ability to discern reality and thus the residency of their opinion or analysis socially or the schizophrenic’s value socially or politically. What I contend in this book or what I reveal as thoughts I have is that I believe war has a hidden multifacetation to it and that it is done for multiple objectives, with a main objective being that it is a big Cultural Production. The war planners conducting various wars are trying to build some sort of cultural edifice in global society. I believe that when the entity that runs the world plans a war, that they consider how various populations of the world will respond to the atrocity and how they will digest the violence or intellectual fodder or the media and relationships of those connected to the war. Of course, there is terror involved in threatening a people or attacking a people that is instructional for other peoples as bombastic punishment to terrorize those resisting a particular political order. Yet of course human nature is to fight back and organize in response, which I believe is a factored into phased operations of wars. Now once one takes Big Brother into account the question becomes what is the veracity of the destruction and what is the way the destruction and violence is used as chess pieces? Part of this inlcudes duplicity and manipulation including in that the knowledge that most political people understand that duplicity and manipulation is the name of the game and that any organized operation will include some amount of conspiracy. For instance, when The New York Times ran a story in the middle of Israeli war on Palestinians that Israeli Intelligence knew of an attack like October 7th could take place a year in advance, my question becomes.. well hmm here is demonstrative duplicity and manipulation, so how deep does it go? Why is an entity like the NY Times granted sanction for or running a story like this for me to digest?

One thing that is seemingly happening is that wars and protests are phased operations blurring lines and muddying the waters on what is an acceptable idea or thought or economic or political action. Like for instance, after the breakdown of encampments on college campuses in protest to Israeli war on Palestine for Hamas Hostage taking and October 7^th attack, on the news I heard a lady who was a CEO for some company that helps people find jobs in Southern California. The CEO said that it may be difficult for protestors to find jobs because they were part of an illegal operation and that they "crossed the line" and the news segment reiterated that opportunities for protestors may be limited. To me it seems the biggest obvious crimes committed as I witnessed the encampments on tv was the defacing of property and building an encampment, then there were ‘clashes” in which thugs were sent in to have a big fight. To me this is all an operation to normalize repercussions and limited opportunities or penalties or controlling speech and political activity. Perhaps that is one cultural edifice of or the product of the war and the factored in or orchestrated ‘reaction’ to it.

Caitlin Johnstone writes "that what is happening in Gaza should be radicalizing you" and my question here is what if what is happening in Gaza or in other wars around the world is "meant" to radicalize people in reaction to atrocity. What if the game is to put people in radicalized camps muddying the political waters of acceptable behavior so that the government or various political factions have triggered excuse to pass draconian laws or revolutionize military affairs? What if the people in wars are being sacrificed for unstated political objectives? What if the purpose is to normalize sacrificing lives for political objectives?

I wouldn't be surprised if the whole Hamas attack was an Israeli false flag for division and elimination of progressives in U.S congress. It certainly seems to have awoken medieval religious kooks and has divided college campuses and made college less attractive to those who don't want to get into medieval battles or join either side of religious kooks. Protestors for Palestine are going around submitting statements to the media that "college is a small privilege" simultaneous to media or organized effort to dismiss college as unlucrative waste of money or time and push the idea that everyone should become a plumber. I don’t think that America will be immune from more normalization of divestment and sanctions on the world stage, which would affect students even affording college in the future. Also. Divestment and sanctions are brutal and hypocritical for any person who has witnessed America's behavior for a century.

I guess I find it curious or always have that there are different factions in Israel and Judaism, and I’ve read in passing that some Zionists who were very powerful in Europe aided Nazis politically because it achieved an envisioned objective, then there are different factions in Palestinian society with radical Islamists, another Abrahamic religion that shares the same god as Christians and Jews and these drastically religious Islamists were actually supported in Palestine by Israel which took a hard line and then these two religions who share the same god as non secular Christianity have seemingly divided students at American intellectual institutions and have shut down intellectual institutions at a time where there is organized effort to make higher education or university too expensive and push country’s youth into trades. What do kids think when they see college students being reduced to medieval combatants with clubs while police back away? I think they may say I’m becoming a hair dresser or a plumber. Not that someone can’t be an intellectual or learned person or intelligent plumber or hair dresser and they are good jobs that I readily admit could be better options financially or socially. What does limiting trust or interest in college do to the intellectual growth of the country? Abrahamic religions have long had an anti-intellectual and anti-free spirit bent to them, which college largely combats traditionally in America. So I question radicalization as part of this organized violence and war process. To what objective exactly are we being radicalized for? Is it not the least bit curious that college campuses are being reduced to medieval combat zones like happened at UCLA? That certainly would help religious violent males rule the day as has been the case for thousands of years.

If wars are somewhat stunt operations masquerading some sort of other operation or creating a type of culture, the question is, what is the aim? Why hide a form of rule or reality? Are there humans residing in the starry sky? On other planets? Or humanoids? Are we the only monkey mutants? Is the technology such as torsion field or antigravity ancient on earth? Are we part of a big front operation or a veil over humanity's advanced breakaway civilization? The more energy people feed a conflict with, the less other issues get addressed or have time to enter into problem solving capacities of all our brains. Perhaps this is the purpose of war. To create general confusion in all our brains. What role did these possible intergalactic fairing civilizations have in World War II?

As reiterated again and again by this author, where there's demonstrative duplictity and manipulation, one should ask how deep does the duplicity and manipulation go? Religiona and State is a demonstrative conspiracy. It is a culture of conspiracy, duplicity and manipulation.

With regards to the specter of nuclear annihilation I find that competition based world leads inevitably to this outcome. One thing I have found is that I agree with John Wooden’s contention that the best person to compete with is yourself. Competition has a place to achieve a bit of fun, but I find that people competing and trying to outperform each other is a sickness in humanity aided by economic and political systems that ultimately ends in disgusting behavior by humans and annihilation. I say this as someone who enjoyed sports much of my life and as a kid felt fair play of sport was a refuge, ( I still enjoy sports and competition as a game) but it's more than just a pastime in scheme of nation building for people in charge. While its also a distraction, which could be good and bad, Sports is used to mold the masses in respective Nations. It conditions you at a young age to compete with your peers and join groups competing with each other. Coaches all say they are teaching you about life and condition you to see life as a game while revering elite rich people and it sorts obedient brainwashed people into a system which is based on individuals and groups atomized and separated, competing for approval by Oligarchs and elite societies and each other, all of whom judge who is worthy of a quality life and subsistence and power. Oligarchs fund and control sports and athletes, who condition the public to revere production machines and act as ambassadors for capitalism as multimillionaires. They also condition the public to ridicule humans like production machines and brands etc.

What I like about the idea of capitalism is that you can conceivably have some choice or autonomy and a piece of property, but what I don’t like is that we all become production machines competing with each other for essential resources guided by accumulating wealth for rich people. Society takes work. There's some crossover appeal of successful hard work paying off into meritocracy as controllers of capital in society, but that's not necessarily descriptive of how system works, and it ignores people as human beings deserving of basic dignity. Also, people who produce a lot shouldn't necessarily dictate economy, which is an obvious problem. I personally would probably prefer it if we split everything like duties, resources and income equally in society, but not everybody is like me, so i don't want to make everybody do that. Also, duties would be difficult to parse out equally, but that's another issue. So, I'm for socialism as a medium between greed and equality. Something that ensures dignity and sustenance for everyone where we realize we are individuals but also responsible for the condition of humanity and earth and the life on it. I think we need to cement human rights like housing, food, clean water, medical care, living wage for disabled and living wage jobs for the abled as amendments to constitution. Why can't we be working 3-4 days a week 5-6 hours a day? We consume many unnecessary bad for you things because we are conditioned in survive mass produce mass consume system. Everyone who’s able could be employed and trained to share workload on necessary or worthwhile endeavors. Why do we require such big salaries or long hours to pay for necessities? Work should be for extra goods services. I think we need to make paycheck necessary for less necessities and guarantee food. I suggest we either have a Universal Basic Income or guarantee housing as a right, lower rent and guarantee healthcare.

 Upon finishing this book I was reminded of the belief I have which I'm sure has been monitored and registered somewhere by a Supercomputer. I saw a lady chastise people who are socialists and she cited a professor who failed his class after they gave the average grade for all grades on tests. The professor was upset that the class thought socialism could work so he took individual grades away and gave collective grades and the class lost motivation. The lady used this example of how people stopped being motivated to learn as a reflection on the feasibility of socialism. 

But I believe that humans can be motivated by more than just starvation, deprivation and riches. You can develop a culture that functions highly outside this paradigm. Will it develop with a professor trying to prove it can't and undermining motives outside individual achievement amongst a lose group of college students? No.

Currently civilization runs off the motivation to not starve, be homeless or other deprivations and gives privileges through riches. I don't think that these are even the best motivating agents for human beings. Certainly not the best to build an entire civilization off of. To some extent the reason our system doesn't crumble now is because people actually, individually, are motivated by more and provide cultural value to our species because of other motivations besides individual achievement. I think humans can develop to be motivated in other ways.

This leads to some of my thoughts on Money and business, which I believe are also monitored by various organizations. What should the role be of money and business ideally on earth? It would seem that a global economy is needed to pull all resources and cooperate to solve the world’s problems. But I don't think money can be king to the point of being the object at the pinnacle dictatorship of economy. Like We shouldn't have an economy in which market forces supersede the survival of life on earth and the greater ecosystems. It is useful to provide some unifying mode valuing labor and goods that everybody buys into. Businesses provide avenues for subsistence and creativity which people democratically vote for with their patronage. I think there should be some commonwealth which meets the basic needs of people and that this should be the general point of the economy. Everyone's well being and happiness should be the aim of our culture and politics within the bounds of earths living survival and sustainability. I also don't want to live in a world where Social Sciences or Arts, Liberal Arts or Humanities get replaced by economic factors like job plugging or universities geared solely toward getting students a job. Like there's more to civilization than that. Social or human development, history and arts are all necessary.

I’ve heard it declared that revolting doesn’t have to be a coup. I find that may be possibly true. Also, I don't think that people who only value you for your revolutionary capacity and not as a human being living a life have your best interest at heart, just like people who only value you for your mental or physical productive capacity or productive capacity in the economy don’t. So, let this book be my contribution to consciousness and search for truth be it part of a revolution or not. On some level it is my revolt.

While necessary types of revolution may take shape via various avenues besides coups, I look forward to election day because I think that democracy is the best way forward to affect change in America in the future. As I will re-iterate later, I think that Trump and Biden have totally tanked or tarnished the presidency and by virtue of destabilizing the highest democratic office have undermined democracy. Biden often says that he is trying to save democracy and campaigns on saving democracy. If you were powerful political organizations interested in saving democracy or the idea of it, I think the last person you’d have as your messenger is Joe Biden. This makes me think Joe Biden is a shill. I think that due to the two-party system, there aren't very many, if any, quality candidates to choose from. In fact, it seems like the powers that be are deliberately placing sorry to say, but schmucky candidates for office or politicians in order to entice a revolt of some kind. But the question I have is to what end? Do they have some other non-democratic solution to the world's or the country's problems. Is this going to be an ugly controlling thing with the rule of violence? I'm a little weary of the culture in America having a violent revolution, as the only revolution of that sort occurred 250 years ago and protected slavery. There is the Chaos theory of the world, that the leaders like to create chaos and then amidst the chaos they can bring about order or thrive in chaos. As far as voting vs nonvoting goes, I don't think it makes much of a difference if I vote vs not voting. I'm not likely to bring along everybody in either scenario. I didn't vote in 2012. I didn't vote for president in 2016. I voted in 2020. I voted in 2022. I do think there is a difference in which party gets control, however there are overlapping oppressions that they doll out on respective populations almost like they are holding people hostage and trying to divide people.

So perhaps we can take these conflicts and find synthesis where we have it and acknowledge where our ideologies fail and we can create some political economic system that is new drawing on what has worked in the past with and what wasn't tried as humans, but without inward peace of mind and freedom how do we do this?

"To have inward solitude and space is very important because it implies freedom to be, to go, to function, to fly. After all, goodness can only flower in space just as virtue can flower only when there is freedom. We may have political freedom but inwardly we are not free and therefore there is no space. No virtue, no quality that is worthwhile, can function or grow without this vast space within oneself. And space and silence are necessary because it is only when the mind is alone, uninfluenced, untrained, not held by infinite varieties of experience, that it can come upon something totally new." Krishnamurti